3 points

9,14 Meter

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

The question states “how fast”, not “how far”, thus you need to give the acceleration at that moment.

At t=0, the boy and girl both haven’t moved, so their positions are 0. The distance between them is also 0, as is their acceleration.

The boy’s distance in meters is t*1.524, the girl’s distance is t*0.3048. The distance between them is sqrt( b^2 * g^2 ). The velocity is the current distance minus the previous distance.

At t=1, b=1.524m, g=0.305, d=sqrt( g^2 * g^2 )=0.465, v=d-d^(t-1)=0.465m/s.

At t=5, b=7.62, g=1.524, d=11.613, and v=4.181m/s.

Edit: fixed markdown

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Velocity is not the difference between distances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s the difference of distances apart over time. Aka how fast bf is moving away from gf, aka what the question is asking for.

Yes, if you want to be pedantic, velocity a vector with direction, so I guess you’d have to frame the question relative to either the boyfriend or girlfriend, but I don’t think the difference between speed and velocity is part of the question.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It doesn’t matter what the actual answer is; to both the boy and the girl it feels like C.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Differential calculus? That looks more like algebra. Their speed is constant.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Each of their speeds is constant, but different, and they’re walking in different directions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Their distance is the hypotenuse of a triangle with sides 5t and t which will be root((5t)2 + t2). So the distance at time t of the ex lovers will be root(26) × t. You can basically grasp intuitively that the speed is indeed constant and equals to the root(26)=5.1 ft/sec. Technically you’d use the derivative power rule to drop the t and get the speed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I agree, it is not calculus, it’s trigonometry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

It’s been a while, but I think it’s quite trivial.

After one second, they span a right angled triangle, therefore (using a² + b² = c²) their distance is √(5²+1²) = ~5.1 ft

They move at constant speed, therefore they seperate at 5.1 ft/s. That means at 5s it’s just 5.1 × 5 = 25.5 ft for the distance and their speed is still the same.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

They each move at a constant speed, but the distance between them doesn’t increase at a constant pace. See my other comment.

Edit: I am dumb, and looked at the wrong number.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I’m trying to apply the most simple math possible and it seems to add up.

After one second, their distance is √(5² + 1²) = ~5.1 ft

After two seconds, their distance is √(10² + 2²) = ~10.2 ft

After three seconds, it’s √(15² + 3²) = ~15.3 ft

As speed is the rate of change of distance over time, you can see it’s a constant 5.1 ft/s. You’re free to point out any error, but I don’t think you need anything more than Pythagoras’ theorem.

The question specifically asks for their seperation speed at 5s to ignore any initial change in their speed as they first need to accelerate at the beginning, I’d assume.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ah sorry, I’m tired and made a mistake. I quickly made a spreadsheet (because keeping track of numbers is hard), and I was looking at the wrong column in the sheet. My bad!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t see why the distance between them isn’t growing at a constant speed.

At any given time t seconds after separation, the boy is 5t north, and the girl is 1t east. The distance between them is defined by the square root of ((5t)^2 + (t)^2 ), or about 5.099t.

In other words, the distance between them is simply a function defined as 5.099t, whose first derivative with respect to time is just 5.099.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points
*

They’re traveling away from their origin at constant velocities, so they’re traveling relative to each other at constant velocities as well.

The magnitude of the resulting vector (i.e., speed) can be calculated trivially since their movement is perpendicular on a plane, as the root of sum of squares, which many could recognize as the Pythagorean theorem:

√((5 ft/s)² + (1 ft/s)²) = √26 ft/s ≈ 5.1 ft/s

You can verify this by finding that their average speed apart is the same at all times (for all t > 0):

Vavg = √((t * 5 ft/s)² + (t * 1 ft/s)²) / t = √(t² * ((5 ft/s)² + (1 ft/s)²)) / t = √26 ft/s

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_geometry

I couldn’t find ‘potatoy geometry’ for a better approximation of earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’ll note that I already assumed that they were on a plane, not the surface of a sphere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m also noting the stick up your ass. 🙄

If the potato remark and subreddit don’t tip you off that I was being flippant, I don’t know what will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Don’t forget to calculate the location where everything about them began and then include the curvature of Earth considering the latitude of said location into your speed calculation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

No, they’re spherical children in a vacuum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

for approximation we can assume that the boy is a point mass and the girl is a lie

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Augustus! Save some room for later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh, so we have to calculate the gravitational attraction pulling them back. Fucking hell

permalink
report
parent
reply