1 point

yoo this works with resist fingerprinting

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

Don’t use dark mode as it is bad for privacy

permalink
report
reply
1 point

What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It makes you unique from a fingerprinting perspective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Websites can look at their own structure, and they can see the changes addons make to them, for example of a CSS property was changed or added.

Maybe there are ways around that, like with the use of a shadow DOM, but I’m not a web developer

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That’s not true for all sites. If the page is static then it’ll have no clue. If it’s dynamic and running a client-side script to report this info back, and if that information is collected, then I can see how that might be a useful supplement for fingerprinting if the server owner is so inclined. At that point though I’m wondering why a security-conscious user is raw dogging the internet and allowing scripts to run in their browser without consent (NoScript saves browsers).

Even then it’s unclear when/how altering the page to render it differently is commonly communicated back to the server, how much identifying information that talk-back is capable of conveying, and how we might mitigate those collections (wholesale abstinence and/or script control aside). What are the specific mechanisms of action we’re concerned about? This isn’t a faux challenge for the sake of hollow rhetoric. I’m ignorant, find the dialogue interesting, and am asking for help being less dumb. :)

I found some brief and useful discussion in this Privacy Guides thread. Seems like the concern is valid but minimal for all but the most strict/defensive postures.

Trying to validate this myself for Dark Reader without breaking out Wireshark and monitoring some big tech site while I toggle color modes (which I might do later if I think of it and find the time) I see Dark Reader is open source, an Open Collective member, and seems to engender little hand-wringing. The only public gripe I can find is this misguided Orion Browser feedback thread.

Thanks for the interesting diversion!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Pro tip: Firefox can do dark mode natively, if you’re ready to accept some ugly websites.

Settings > Manage colors > then set your preferred hues and Override to Always.

It’s blazing fast with zero white flash, and most sites are perfectly legible.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

While I’m glad they’re trying this, it has the same problem as Brave, no configuration. Dark Reader lets you configure individual site profiles via a toggle of static/dynamic/etc to fix ones that don’t work well. Without that, nothing will compare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Is there a way for the same on Firefox on Android, Fenix?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Dark Reader has been in development since 2014 and is much more polished

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Although it works well, this is so experimental, it makes lab rats look like seasoned professionals.

Looks good, but I wait until its proven and stable.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

It’s been in development for 4 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because of the fact that UltimaDark is going the hardest route, using a totally different API, unlike Dark Reader

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

That doesn’t mean it’s stable. From his own description:

This is still highly experimental so it can also ruin your internet experience

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yea, I mean it will take eternity(not really) to become stable. xD

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 887

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators