A new Nintendo Switch 2 rumor has surfaced claiming that the next-generation hybrid console could actually arrive with more memory than a powerful rival like the Microsoft Xbox Series S. The same source has also offered an update in regard to the Switch 2’s potential DLSS support and ray-tracing capabilities.

58 points

Nintendo having hardware with some oomph? Bullshit. Their thing is making cheap consoles that appeal to anyone who isn’t an edgy teenager. Dlss, Ray tracing, etc is still too new for them.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Stable internet servers, to me, is probably the single most important thing.

The lack of those is the primary reason all of their online league attempts are failing, despite the games themselves being perfect for leagues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

More importantly too battery draining. I can’t imagine them making a much bulkier switch but it could be that DLSS and Raytracing is docked only or optional with battery warnings if used undocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nintendo never really did complicated. Can’t imagine them doing a battery warning with features you can turn on/off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Why not? The N64 and GameCube were both more powerful than their era’s PlayStation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

While that is true, the Wii, Wii U, and Switch have all been less powerful than their Microsoft and Sony counterparts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Good hardware sold bad, bad hardware sold good. Easy choice really

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I mean the Xbox Series S will be a 4 year old non-high-end console by the time the Switch 2 will be released. I can definitely see them go in that direction.

Maybe it will have more RAM, but it will most likely have slower/cheaper RAM. LPDDR5 or LPDDR5X instead of GDDR6. Should also be more power efficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Ram is easy to believe, but imo raytracing and dlss are still too new. That said, something I hadn’t thought about is that with the OG Switch using Nvidia’s tegra, it’s entirely possible that Nvidia pushed them to adopt a next-gen version that includes dlss and rtx support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Neither are too new. Both features are technically available for volta gpus or newer. The switch was maxwell, and unless you fully believe the switch 2 will use pascal (2016), then it is at the very minimum, using volta, which means it can use rtx/dlss (but i dont expwct it to ACTUALLY use rtx)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Raytracing, no chance just from a performance standpoint even if it “supports” it, but DLSS is a given. If anything, I’m worried they’ll end up relying on DLSS to get games “playable”, just like what’s happening on PC.

It’ll definitely be DLSS 2, though. No chance they get DLSS 3.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I bet the Switch 2’s SoC will include a GPU based on Ampere or newer, which means RTX 3000 series capabilities which. Nvidia Tegra Orin from 2019 already included that much.

Of course it will be very likely more limited than even a 3060 mobile chip, but it could include both RT and DLSS 3.5 if they wanted to. I doubt they use RT but DLSS would make a lot of sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It just needs to be a Steam Deck w/nVidia hardware instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Performance wise they may get there, but that’s not what makes the steam deck stand out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I mean ram means fairly little in terms of raw power

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

DLSS or the AMD knock-off would actually be pretty good for them.

RT is kind of pointless in low end hardware though.

Be interesting to see if they support VRR since they control what screen goes into it. A lot more PC users accepting 40fps since Steam Deck. Forcing everything into 30 or 60 is kind of limiting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It should be DLSS if they stay with Nvidia, which they seem to be based on the rumors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Having more RAM than the series S doesn’t translate to “having hardware with some oomph”. The series S is memory starved. 10GB was a small amount even when it launched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The Steam Deck already has +6GB more RAM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This got a hearty chuckle out of me. Thank You

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

in typical nintendo fashion the bar for hardware is on the floor

permalink
report
reply
14 points

More RAM doesn’t really mean anything in gaming performance. It helps, but a faster CPU and GPU with a good whack of VRAM is gonna help more.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

arguably RAM matters the most

gpu and cpu you can just downgrade the quality, but at a certain point everything has to fit into memory

e.g., baldur’s gate 3 literally couldn’t be properly ported to the S because of a RAM limitation

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh shit, really? Wasn’t even aware of that lol, I always had the generally recommended amount of RAM in my gaming rig so I never thought that would be a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

There is a point where more ram doesnt help and maybe that’s what you are thinking of. It’s more “must be this tall to ride” from my understanding

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Also, textures, usually they don’t really cost performance and absolutely change the visuals of a game, but can be massively limited by a lack of ram

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Consoles have shared RAM between CPU and GPU, more RAM is more VRAM

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You are thinking from pc pov. PS3 is perhaps the last major home console that have dedicated ram and vram, maybe 3ds had it on the handheld front

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not sure about 3DS, but the PlayStation Vita had 128 MB of VRAM in addition to the 512 MB of system RAM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

One thing about the 12GB of RAM: it may be costly now, but it will become cheaper after three, four years into the cycle.

Second, there is also the bandwidth. The Steam Deck has 32x4GB LPDDR5. I believe they wanted 8GB but DLSS and ML (if they add them to the next SoC) require at least 4GB plus. Hence, 32x4GB (96 bits). If the Steam Deck can get away with slightly more, then why not slightly less.

So yes, I can see this device with 12GB of RAM to ensure DLSS and ML work without hitches.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

It really should, the Series S is already looking dead and we are only at the beginning of the console lifecycle.

permalink
report
reply

Gaming

!gaming@beehaw.org

Create post

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it’s gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming’s sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.4K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments