U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has repeatedly claimed that she worked at McDonald’s while getting her undergraduate degree in the 1980s. This claim has been reported by multiple reputable news outlets, but aside from Harris’ own testimony, there is no independent evidence such as a photo, employment record, or confirmation from a friend or family member to verify the story. Harris has invoked the alleged McDonald’s work experience throughout her political career, including in a 2024 presidential campaign ad and during a 2024 appearance on “The Drew Barrymore Show.” Other prominent Democrats, such as former President Bill Clinton, have also repeated the anecdote. However, some internet users have challenged the claim, with unverified reports that “McDonald’s Corporate sources” have no record of Harris working at their locations. Snopes reached out to Harris’ campaign and McDonald’s headquarters seeking evidence to corroborate the claim, but as of the report’s publication, no such proof has been uncovered. Without tangible evidence to independently confirm or debunk the story, Snopes has rated the claim “Research In Progress” as they continue to investigate.

79 points
*

What the fuck kind of hilarious nonsense is this

Is she planning to deploy the military against protestors and have them seize the voting machines? Or destroy the departments of Education and Labor? No? Okay, cool, she’s got my vote. Now let’s move on to talking about either (a) how to make sure she wins, or (b) how we can get better behavior out of the Democrats on Gaza and climate policy.

Get this Fox News horseshit out of here, pls and thank you

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Fox ENTERTAINMENT needs to be banned

permalink
report
parent
reply
-49 points
*

did you read the article?

came from snopes.com not foxnews.com

do fact checkers not matter to Democrats either?

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Did YOU read the article.

It basically says, there is no proof she worked at McD, but there also isn’t any proof she didn’t. It was 40 years ago.

So actually it says NOTHING. Why did you post it? To stir shit up out of hot air.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Is this your deciding factor in whether or not you vote for her? Because if it is, it’s extremely pathetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

bOtH sIdEs

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Still waiting for verdantbanana to break down more about the US voting system to me

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

So you’re recommending we vote for Trump?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Can they actually prove anyone worked at McDonalds that long ago? Aside from saving a pay stub for 40 years I don’t see how one could prove or disprove such a thing, I doubt the company keeps records of every employee that far back.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

She could have worked for a franchisee, too. If that was the case, a SMB owner is definitely not going to have those records after all this time

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Assuming that franchise is still even open. How long does the US gov hold onto tax returns? The IRS says there’s usually no need to keep them after 6 years. The best evidence they could find would probably be a coworker that corroborates the story or a photograph of Harris behind the counter working. The photo seems unlikely, and how many coworkers from 30 years ago do you remember?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The Social Security Administration has a record of every employer that’s ever paid you and how much they paid you each year.

They have to for paying out social security.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I can’t think of any way how I could proof the first job I had during school in the late 90’s. I was working in a restaurant kitchen, peeling potatoes and stuff. You don’t take photos there or keep name tags or other keepsakes. It was a shitty job, you want to forget about it, as soon as you left the premises.

Kamala Harris’ job is even longer ago. 40 years is a long time to keep paystubs or something. There were no camera phones back then, no digital footprint you could recreate. That she can’t produce any proof, doesn’t proof anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Social security records.

90s is nothing, a normal person could get it in a month, one of her aids could probably get it in an hour.

Does it matter tho?

Eh, it would be fucked up if she just flat out lied, but it’s hard to imagine she would lie about that.

If she proves it tho, they’ll make a new stupid claim and if she doesn’t prove it they’ll use this as evidence that she would prove it if it wasn’t true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

How to know when OP is unhinged and divisive:

People are agreeing with givesomefucks, who often gets down voted for unpopular views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Truly, today is some interesting times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Damn, you aren’t wrong!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s like when people think that them walking by causing street lights to go out.

We’re pattern recognition machines, and we have certain biases. People don’t notice all the streetlights that are working, just the ones that flicker. Either it happens right next to you, or you don’t notice.

Chances are you’re only looking at usernames when it’s really down voted. With the rare exception this time.

I bet if your scrolled thru my post history, you’ve up voted me more than youve down voted me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Seems pretty ridiculous to judge the validity of an argument based on whether people agree with a particular commenter or not.

Ideas should be evaluated on their own merit, not dismissed because of who supports or opposes them.

This kind of thinking only stifles discussion and perpetuates division, which is exactly what we should be avoiding if we’re serious about finding solutions. Let’s focus on the content of the conversation, not the personalities involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Social security records. 90s is nothing, a normal person could get it in a month

I tried this and it takes ages. I applied back on July 1st and haven’t heard a peep yet - apparently this can take many months or sometimes even years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Man, you know what?

I was wrong.

I’m used to having to get other people’s records, to look up my own back to my first highschool job, took literally less than five minutes.

Coincidentally, it was also a McDonald’s.

Try it yourself. Ssa.gov

I applied

Well, that’s not what anyone was talking about about…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Also, and possibly more importantly…

…WHo FuKinG CArES?!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

60 comments in this thread. And snopes looking it up. So seems some people do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Shit!

She coulda had @UniversalMonk@lemmy.world’s vote if only she [had|hadn’t] worked at McDonald’s

😞😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

… who cares?

Sometimes people bounce from one job to another. College jobs don’t have to be her identity.

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

She’s not a sex offender or a convicted felon.

permalink
report
reply
-21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Unlike Trump who totally didn’t tell Isreal to “finish up” and to get it over with “fast” because they were “losing the PR war” and then, when Biden didn’t supply weapons to Israel, claimed Biden “abandoned” them.

Oh, and who, just a month ago pledged to help save Israel while also saying that Harris hates them? Who also failed to cut military aid to Israel during his presidency? Oh, right, also Trump.

Neither of our primary parties are going to back down on Israeli support any time soon. While I don’t approve of what’s happening. It’s foolish to think that this is a dividing factor in this election. It’s not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are ya stupid or astroturfing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’re a bad faith actor here to say words.

That’s it.

They have no substance, they are not going to engage in good faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

When someone tells me they worked a specific job in college, I have never once doubted the truth of that statement. Why would anyone have reason to lie about such a thing? If it was a complete lie, you’d constantly be at risk of being exposed by a close friend who knew the truth, which is WAY WORSE for a presidential candidate. To even explore this as Snopes is pro-Trump.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments