3 points
*

If someone comes to seek asylum in a country foreign to that one or wants to build a life there, but so willingly disregards its laws, they have overstayed their welcome.

However, that does not mean that deporting them back to where they came from is necessarily better in case torture, death or similar things await them there. In that case they could be killed, tortured, whatever right on the spot as the outcome will be the same. No need to fly them out then. There is blood on one’s hand either way and therefore not a solution I would deem meaningful.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

It’s the correct call

permalink
report
reply
18 points

It’s not. Human rights are only human rights if they are universal and even criminals deserve to be protected from abuse and torture.

Plus, it doesn’t actually solve anything. It just moves the problem elsewhere and will most likely have involved the German government directly giving money to the Taliban regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

True, but the world isn’t an idealist paradise, nor is it all black and white; compromises are a necessity, starting with the ones that least deserve leniency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

That does not justify sending people some place where theft is punished with amputation and nonconformity to extreme religious doctrine with death.

Doing so anyway is causing unnecessary harm on behalf of bigoted xenophobes

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Imagine what that has cost the tax paying citizens of Germany. All for guilt from 80 years ago.

Remember your past sure. Don’t make the same mistakes again. Absolutely.

But to hold those people for that long, for “their own safety” is just bizarre.

Imagine any other country doing that?

Honesty, I’m all ears to hear why Germany should have spent all that money for all those years. Maybe I’m ignorant on certain facts. It’s just so surreal to read though.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

You realize organizing a charter flight and bribes for Qatar are a lot more expensive than keeping 20-odd people in jail, right?

Saving money, not giving money to autocracies, and also saving human lives seems like a win-win-win to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Where are you getting 20 years from? Most likely, most of these convictions are either already past or sub-1-year convictions for stealing, drug offences, refugee-specific offences (like leaving town) or random other small shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t think it’s guilt from 80 years ago, I think most countries would do the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Keep them safe, or send them away?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This has nothing to do with guilt from 80 years ago. What are you even on about?

This is being done because Scholz is a spineless wimp, trying to appease the far-right in an attempt to steal back votes from the AfD (which will not work and will only further alienate the SPDs voter base). It’s a political move and the people being deported are being used as pawns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

One of the learnings from WWII was that a working asylum system is important. But yeah, terming this “guilt” is bs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Imagine any other country doing that?

Many other countries do in fact do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 624

    Posts

  • 4.8K

    Comments