Incase anyone tells you that lemmy.ml is not a tankie instance.

39 points

Only 30 days?

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

I’m shocked it wasn’t a permaban, honestly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They’re being reasonable 😏

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

What happened in Libya according to them?

permalink
report
reply
117 points

Poor Gaddafi was attacked by the corrupt NATO, to the disgust of the rest of the world (except that it was resolution by the UN security council).

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Thanks for the reminder, happy cake day

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

All the happy cake days to you! What will you do with your time without them? ;) EDIT: i.e., without lemmy.ml

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

except that it was resolution by the UN security council

You mean the Security Council over which Russia has veto power? That UN Security Council?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Russia’s decision to abstain in that vote happened under the notoriously “liberal” Medvedev and was a point of heated disagreement between him and Putin. It was arguably the breaking point for Putin deciding he needed to hold onto power indefinitely or else (in his view) a liberal president would let NATO do whatever they want, with Russia presumably being next on the chopping block

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points
*

Except there is strong evidence that Western powers (predominantly France, the UK and US) created the fiction of Gaddafi being a global supervillain and then used NATO forces to enact regime change in Libya, under the pretext of “preventing civilian casualties”. In fact, the real objective was to secure Libyan oil reserves and open the country up to western markets.

NATO is often used an extension of Western foreign policy. To pretend it is solely a benevolent peace keeper is just as simplistic and naïve as saying that everything the West does is pure evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Interesting, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

Gaddafi was a supervillian. Almost literally:

.

It also wasn’t NATO who directly killed him. His own citizens did, and they weren’t kind about how they did it.

NATO also wants stable oil reserves. Both these things can be true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

During Arab Spring, the West was (naively) hoping that Libyans would rise against Gaddafi and create a democraty. When he saw what was happening, he threatened to a) flood Europe with migrants and b) expose Sarkozy’s illegal campaign funds.

a) made him a political adversary, b) made them launch a military campaign to topple him

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

there is strong evidence propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You people seriously hate history and facts, don’t you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

One air campaign in Libya (permitted by UNSCR 1973) > fourteen Russian invasions

Checkmate, Westoids

permalink
report
parent
reply
237 points

Look, NATO is bad, that’s why it’s absolutely necessary for anti-imperialism purposes that Russia invades its neighbors before they can get into NATO!

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Which works about as good as rhe war on terror

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

“Bro just one more invasion bro I swear this time it’ll really solve terrorism Western Imperialism™ for good!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Problem is, Russia is technically in the west.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I am still amazed at the 12 dimensional chess thought process of invading a country that didn’t join NATO to discourage joining NATO. All that socialized vodka in the maternity ward must be getting out of hand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is logic amped up to 11 right here, folks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

MeanwhileOnGrad

!meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

Create post

“Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he’s on the floor!”

Welcome to MoG!

Meanwhile On Grad

Documenting hate-speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse


What is a Tankie?

Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of bias)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don’t be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism or any variation of Tankie Ideology. There is no justifying Genocide.

Revisionism — Downplaying or denying atrocities past and present will result in an immediate ban.

If you’re violating instance rules, you’ll typically be warned. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last seven days, but repeat infractions will have longer sentences. You may ask to be unbanned.


Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 196

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments