33 points

bare in mind? Didn’t they like, invent English?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

We invented football too but it doesn’t seem to have helped

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re the ones that decided to call it soccer to confuse Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

There is a good chance this is just a fake letter.
This guy was making them for fun a while back, and they surface from time to time.
I’m pretty sure the dashcam submission system is called Operation Snap, not Capture, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Operation Captured is Nottinghamshire police’s system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Invented English? Nah, mate, nothing homegrown there. We imported it - a strong base if Anglo-Saxon and a dollop of Norman French making it a bit more posh, with shoots of Brythonic, Latin and Old Norse poking through the cracks. All that before we went nicking words from all over the world that took our fancy.

By this pont we barely know how it all works - we’re like monkeys driving a monster truck frankensteined together from an ice cream van, a golf cart, a tank and a Postman Pat toy; just mashing the controls hoping to make it go in vaguely the right direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Anglo-Saxon isn’t a language beyond meaning Old English or Degenerated German, but otherwise sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

By your definition, every language is like that then. The only “pure” languages are spoken in countries with small populations. And even then they still get external influences, and I doubt it would be spoken as it was 1000/2000/3000 years ago…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Many believe so, but the Nottingham Police merely perfected English.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unfortunately, the original Englic has been lost, and replaced with the less precise English

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Wonder what would happen if 20 simultaneous complaints were submitted about the chief constables and councilmembers, say, roughly every week?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

‘If you were not the twat shouting at other people for using the road, please bring this telling-off to their attention.’

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Appear to take up more road space? It does take up more road space.

permalink
report
reply
59 points
*

In the UK, you’re not meant to get within 6ft of a bike when you’re overtaking it (although it’s pretty common for drivers to get muddled and think that rule’s talking about inches). That means it’s not safe to overtake if there are oncoming vehicles in the opposite lane or solid white lines in the middle of the road. Another bike a metre or so from the first one doesn’t change that if you’ve got to cross into the opposite lane anyway, and it’s better if they’re two abrest as you don’t need to be in the opposite lane for as long.

There are plenty of idiot cyclists who endanger themselves, but there are also plenty of drivers who accuse people of being idiot cyclists when they’re following The Highway Code to the letter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

When I’m cycling on dual carriageways, it’s interesting to realise that some drivers overtake me by moving to straddle the line between lanes (‘fine’), some drivers move into the other lane (‘great’), and some don’t move at all, demonstrating that even when there’s a whole other lane to use, they’re happy to skim past me. And by ‘interesting’, I mean ‘often terrifying’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I cycle. I can’t fathom the risk some cyclists will take. Cycling on a dual carriageway? Absolutely no chance. Cycling on a busy A-road? No way.

Having the right to be there doesn’t mean it’s any less risky when you have great big lorries hurtling by at > 50mph.

Graveyards are full of people who had the right of way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Same problem in Canada. On some narrower roads the cyclist has to take up more road to force the drivers to wait until there is no incoming traffic in the other lane before overtaking. Otherwise some of them will try to squeeze through with zero consideration for the cyclist’s safety.

I’ve learned that in motorcycle riding lessons. You have to constantly defend your safety bubble. If you let drivers see a gap that looks big enough they will try to squeeze through it and will push you off the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’ve learned that in motorcycle riding lessons. You have to constantly defend your safety bubble. If you let drivers see a gap that looks big enough they will try to squeeze through it and will push you off the road.

Yep, it’s the same here in the UK. Years ago, when I did my bike test, the examiner would test the gaps I was leaving, so if I indicated to turn right, he would attempt to gently push his way into the gap on my right to make sure that I wasn’t leaving room for someone to try to squeeze past.

Obviously he did it in a safe way to make sure that I would be safe on the road on my own :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

That’s right, as a cyclist I have to watch out for myself and the person trying to pass me, to make sure they don’t try a dangerous move when oncoming traffic is approaching (I have an ebike so drivers are a little less pissed at me on the uphills). On backroads I give hand signals, pump my left palm downward to tell them to wait a sec if I see traffic ahead or blind curves, then when clear, I wave forward in a similar motion as to summoning a dog, and I move to the side to tell them to pass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just the other day, a driver passed a group of cyclists while on a quiet road. He honked the entire way past while driving down the wrong side of the road and failed to notice the oncoming cars while the bikes and other cars were trying to get his attention. Luckily, the other cars slammed on their brakes and horns and nobody was hurt or killed.

…The road was about four blocks long and isn’t even a major road because it runs into a city park. He didn’t make it past the cyclists because the road was so short, and there were other cars coming the other way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

In the UK

6ft of a bike

think that rule’s talking about inches

What

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They pass 6in away from you instead of 6ft

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Cyclists are entitled to basically the same amount of space as you would give a car. If it’s not safe to pass a cyclist unless they are riding single file, it’s not safe to pass the cyclist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

I’d say they’re cunts for taking what they’re entitled to, instead of what works for everybody.

Your second sentence is obviously false as it excludes those situations where the threshold safe passing width is between the remainder of single file and double abreast formations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Billions of people driving their cars definitely doesn’t “work for everybody”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d say they’re cunts for taking what they’re entitled to

Get fucked

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What a narrow-minded way of thinking about transport.

I bet you fucking drive alone in a 5-seater all the time.

You’re an absolute asshole mate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Britons not queuing?! My whole worldview just went upside down.

permalink
report
reply

okmatewanker

!okmatewanker@feddit.uk

Create post

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 207

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments