I think this has the quote wrong?
Pretty sure it’s “suck my tongue”
Didn’t this guy own slaves or some shit?
I doubt it, the pla stopped all that shit in the fifties. He’s old but not that old. Afaik he’s spent most of his life being trotted around as a mascot for anti-chinese propaganda. I don’t think he’s ever had much, if any, agency.
Tenzin was born after the fall of the Tibetan feudal system so no he didn’t personally.
What? Serfdom was abolished in 1959 and he was born in 1935, and became Dalai Lama in 1940.
I’ve seen his kindness and it shouldn’t be around kids
The other day, after I claimed that china isn’t a historically expansionist or militarist country, I was told “what does the dalai lama have to say about that?”. Holy shit people are dumb. Like, ask the pope what he thinks about the genocide in Palestine instead, genius.
The idea of China invading the country at the request of the Tibetan Communist Party, crushing the Lamas, freeing the slaves, and iirc they had to do it twice because the Lamas tried to start shit again, would never penetrate, would it?
I remember a Chinese person slapping down some of this bullshit saying that 98% of Tibetans speak Tibetan and asking the American how many native americans spoke an indigenous language.
and asking the American how many native americans spoke an indigenous language
And this is why libs invented ‘that’s just whataboutism’
There’s also just the fact that Tibet diplomatically rejoined with China right after the end of the Civil War and only decided to split a decade later, after much work had been done to improve conditions for the serfs and this lead to an outraged aristocratic class trying to breakaway to maintain power. It’s very roughly like calling the US expansionist for invading the Confederacy.
A question for them would be “what does the Dalai Lama have to say about Nepal having peasant slaves into the 20th century and why do all the Bhuddist Temples have to be gilded in gold?”
Isn’t Nepal governed by a communist party? Why would they allow that?
Sorry I know basically nothing about Nepal I am a little baby.
The Maoist uprising only occurred within the last 20 years, starting around 1996 and the monarchy was abolished in 2006. There were a lot of concessions made for this to happen and restrictions put on the most militant Maoists to re-integrate them into society and work with them through political processes instead of further violence. They’ve been ruled by a Democratic coalition government for a while that includes a few different communist groups. But they aren’t a wholly socialist country and there’s still elements of monarchism and things like that.
As other posters have said yeah the communist uprising and now coalition state have outlawed slavery and sought restitution from the Monastery system for it, outlawed the monarchy, and additionally the quality of life significantly went up especially child and maternal health. Also don’t feel bad about asking questions leftists love answering questions
“The evil colonialism of the US North preventing slavery without the consent of the South” - probably something an Amerikkkan has said before
Back when I used to make the mistake of browsing through quora, this was absolutely the kind of cope that was popular amongst americans.
“Your own mind, your own heart, and your child sex slaves are the temple. Your philosophy is simple kindness and millions of dollars.”
