57 points

TBF, he still got some preferential treatment, which he said himself. What if he wasn’t Tyreek Hill?

permalink
report
reply
44 points

The preferential treatment was that the body cams were just muted during the cover up and not all accidentally turned off for the entire encounter, not getting beaten up, tased or shot.

I mean as far as preferential treatment goes I’d take that deal, but the fact remains he was pulled out of his car, roughed up, taken to the floor and handcuffed for 18minutes for no reason when the cop should have been writing him a (dubious) ticket.

There are at least 2 cops here who should not be cops and the rest need to be retrained to ensure they step in if they see mistreatment like this again, for face being fired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

The window being all the way down was not a safety issue, but i have zero faith that a court would determine the cops to have used excessive force. I’ll see you all at the next post where nothing changes!

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

I remember a video of a white woman closing the window into a policeman’s fingers, driving off (over his foot?) getting forced off the road again, screaming insults at the police, hitting them with the car door, before they resort to, iirc, a taser or dragging her out (might be more than one such video)

So in my mind, that’s kind of the ‘gold standard’ for behaviour which only leads to slow incremental steps in the use of force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

It was the fully tinted window being all the way up that created the safety issue in the officer’s eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

I find it interesting how some folks feel this is entirely an issue of policing gone wrong. There can be no fault for Tyreek here, apparently.

In Florida, the traffic code states that not following an officer’s lawful order or direction is a misdemeanor offense. It allows the police officer to remove Tyreek from his car and cuff him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s not illegal to roll a window up

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Try doing it the next time you are at a traffic stop and the officer asks you not too. See how it works out for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

when everyone and their mother has a gun in the U.S., and you’re hiding behind heavily tinted windows, then yes, it is a safety issue. It’s not an unreasonable request to keep your window rolled down during a traffic stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Don’t take the job if you ain’t willing to take a bullet over a traffic stop. That’s the job. You don’t get to violate rights for your own safety. Your safety is secondary as a cop. If you can’t handle that fact of the position then you would be a shit cop.

Pizza delivery drivers have a higher chance to get shot than a fucking cop and yet you don’t hear pizza drivers capping people left and right for their own safety. So I don’t wanna hear your bullshit.

Die for that traffic stop pig. You wanted the badge without the risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You don’t get to violate rights for your own safety.

Are we still talking about the window? How did telling him to roll his opaque window down violate his rights?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As we saw, it’s actually a bigger safety issue if the cops can order you to lower your window. Fortunately, you and I don’t get to decide what’s “reasonable” in this context. It would go to the appeals courts, and who knows what would happen.

I think it’s likely that the appeals courts would say that Pennsylvania v. Mimms already let cops order people out of the car, which solves the safety problem, so there’s no need to give cops extra authority to order you around willy-nilly. The ordinary person has a clear interest in knowing what exactly cops can and can’t order, and you’re proposing increasing the ambiguity of it all, which (as we just saw) is dangerous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

it’s actually a bigger safety issue if the cops can order you to lower your window

most inane take I’ve read about this interaction

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not relevant

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And why not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I’ll be honest, I’ve seen plenty of these types of stops on YouTube, I know guilty pleasure, and once he rolled up that window, Black, White, Chinese, Indian, you were going to get pulled out and arrested for contempt of cop.

Don’t get me wrong, police do racially profile and harass Black people disproportionally and are racists assholes but the traffic stop? I don’t think race played as much of a factor than just good ol’ fragile cop ego where a white guy showing the same behavior would have been mostly the same thing happen, just that the white guy would have been in no danger of being killed but gun or suffocation.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

It also wouldn’t have made the news. We wouldn’t be talking about a white cop violating a white persons rights either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think Tyreek is a piece of shit, but these officers didn’t handle this very well either.

permalink
report
reply
-15 points

I’ll get downvoted, but the body cam footage I saw showed Tyreek talking back to the officer, refusing instructions by rolling up his window, and telling them not to knock on his car window. It’s not exactly surprising he got yanked out of his car. Go ahead and argue it wouldn’t happen to a white person. I’m not getting into that discussion. Perhaps the cops should have attempted to deescalate, but Tyreek did himself 0 favors. Was not surprised that he found out after fucking around with the cop.

permalink
report
reply
37 points
*

At this point, what you’re saying is like telling a woman she shouldn’t have been there or wearing that, and ignoring the real issue with power here.

Cops largely are pathetic power-abusing shitheads who escalate at every possible opportunity. You should not have to cower to every whim and demand of a cop if you are not doing anything dangerous. Cops have lost any credibility to suggest that we should have to give a shit about every stupid fucking tiny thing they have an issue with.

Based on your argument, you could say you’ll only speak to a lawyer and you’re giving the cops an out to beat the shit out of you for not complying. Cops don’t understand non-violent approaches to solving any problem, and THAT is the problem to focus on.

Fuck the police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure, fuck the police but I argue a white person or a black person is heading for a bad time if they act the way that he acted. I can’t speculate on this any more than anybody else on “what if” scenarios should Tyreek have been white, but if you create a situation where the cop does not feel safe (e.g. rolling up your 100% tinted windows against their instructions) then you are going to get an escalation from the police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

if you create a situation where the cop does not feel safe

You reach for your license ‘too fast’ - cop does not feel safe Acorn falls on car - cop doesn’t feel safe You are boiling water at home - cop does not feel safe You are writhing in pain underneath their boot - cop does not feel safe

US cops are literally brainwashed into feeling like the public is a threat to them. They are wired to look for a reason to escalate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I don’t have any studies to hand, but isn’t the disparity between police responses to non-white vs white suspects a given at this point, in the US at least?

But lets look at your argument both ways.

On the one hand you’d be arguing that race disparity in police responses doesn’t exist at all and so wouldn’t apply here.

Or

Race disparity exists, but in this specific situation it doesn’t apply for some reason.

If that’s the case , id be interested in hearing why you think it doesn’t apply in this specific circumstance?

Neither of those sound plausible to me but i could be missing what your actual argument is entirely, in which case, would you mind explaining why it doesn’t fall in to the above categories?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Yeah nah. I thought your comment was probably the reasonable middle ground until I watched the footage too.

The police has 100% needlessly escalated to violence and fully on a power trip. They have not provided any reason for asking the window to be rolled down - nor did they have any. You can see into the car even though there’s a lot of glare on the camera, most likely even better vision for a person. They made no attempt to explain any reasoning for the request to persuade him. Once on the ground and being cuffed, they proceeded to shout at him “when we tell you to do something you do it, not what you want”. That’s not how it works.

He didn’t even try to resist the arrest but they treated him with quite a bit of force. They didn’t listen at all when he called out he had an injury and needs more time to comply with the order of sitting down.

Yes, Tyreek did himself no favours with his attitude but he has also done absolutely nothing to deserve this treatment. He wasn’t even particularly rude to the cops, his mistake seemed to be not to act fully deferential to a cop on a power trip, which is absolutely no reason to treat anyone like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

So you think that we owe abject obedience to authority figures because they might hurt you otherwise but it would still be your fault if they did?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Sounds a lot like an abusive husband claiming that he wouldn’t have to beat his wife if she hadn’t burned their dinner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

How does this relate to domestic abuse and what did I say to imply that I am one who would do such a thing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

No, I don’t. I don’t believe I stated that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

I’ve been Tyreek and have been picked up on disorderly conduct charges for mocking a police officer to his face. They did not treat me like that. It was all bullshit too, they just wanted to search me thinking I was an easy target.

What you’re are saying is the police get your complete obedience no matter what. Frankly, that is just not how humans work. I don’t care if you’re an authority. If you target me I will feel a way about it.

Edit: BTW charges dropped because being rude is not illegal. Cops don’t just get your complete obedience. That is not the law. It may be a norm but we have the power to change norms. To change laws. Don’t perpetuate your own oppression.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Disrespecting a police officer is not an invitation for police brutality. You are a bootlicker for having this mentality.

Police officers should be professionals and try to use the least violent means necessary, and if there is even a hint of excess, they should be deemed unfit to hold the power of authority over others. Police should be reactive on the escalation ladder, only using violence when they receive violence. However, police are given a carte blanche to do violence by claiming in any interaction that they felt threatened, giving them impunity and why we’re here today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It was Tyreek not following directions and making the inside of his car not clearly visible to the officer (despite his requests). That creates a safety problem for the officer. This was the main issue IMO. If words don’t work and the citizen is not cooperating then I’m curious what is the next step besides pulling the guy from his car?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

He lowered his window, handed his license over, and put his windows back up. The officer felt safe enough to stand by the widow for half a minute, knocking on the glass. The argument that the situation was threatening holds zero water and is just bootlicker cope.

The officer can make all kinds of demands, but if they don’t fall under the procedures they are required to follow, then it’s on the officer. The lack of following procedures is likely why the officer is suspended and will hopefully no longer be on the force. The excessive use of force is also going to result in tax payers paying millions to the recipient of the assault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Requests are optional, my friend. And the visibility no concern. We know that’s a blatant lie. You want to know how we know? Easy.

What if the cop doesn’t force him out of the car? What would the cop do? I got it! He’d go back to his police car, far from Tyreek, perfectly safe, and then he’d write up the ticket. Then he’d walk back to Tyreek and give him the ticket. The end. Almost no contact, and all of that with backup officers on hand ready to assist. No violence, no handcuffs, no nothing.

After all, most people driving expensive cars aren’t gonna stress about a speeding ticket. So give them the ticket already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yeah man, being rude to a public servant justifies being torn out of your car, slammed into the pavement and placed in handcuffs. Fuck right off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Please don’t resort to those words. I am entitled to my opinion in this community without being told to fuck off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No you ain’t. Open your mouth and get a mouth back. Telling people to obey or be beaten like that’s a reasonable thing to say. Go fuck yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I am entitled to my opinion in this community

As is everyone else!

And just like everyone else, your feelings of entitlement don’t protect you from having your shit opinion criticised, nor you, for having it!

So fuck off, racist bootlicker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You must be new on the internet. But for real, I feel you. Internet is very polarized and people resort to rudeness way too quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

My dad once rolled his window up on a cop. He told officer to wait because he was on a cell call with my step mom.

He didn’t get dragged out of vehicle, the state tropper waited and then gave my dad a huge fine.

Two things this was the 90’s in Texas and my dad is white.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Being rude is protected by the Constitution, as you learned in high school civics class. You did a perfect job of blaming the victim.

On the other hand, maybe what you were trying to say is something like, “We gotta be practically-minded because the cops are dirty racist bastards who will beat the hell out of us.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

as you learned in high school civics class

As you learned in what now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I took AP US Government in highschool, but I don’t remember what the non-AP alternative was. I think civics classes were the same idea but got removed at some point because I don’t remember hearing about them while I was in school. The same way reading class got merged into language arts class I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know. I slept through a bunch of high school classes, but I heard that people studied that kind of stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Being rude is protected, but holeing yourself in the car after committing a crime is not.

The police have to identify, notify, serve and if required detain. Preventing this is obstruction.

Still they handled this in one of the worst possible ways. Obstruction doesn’t mean force is required, and specially not before extensive attempts to deescalate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Speeding isn’t a crime, it’s an infraction. If speeding is a crime then everyone is a criminal. It’s not like he held up a gas station.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He was waiting to receive his ticket. All they had to do was wrote the ticket. What was obstructed, other than their egos? … This is contempt of cop, nothing more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you don’t do anything immoral, you shouldn’t be arrested. Refusing to submit to cops is not enough reason alone for them to physically harass you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

He wasn’t arrested. He was temporarily detained so that the police officers could safely issue a speeding ticket to an uncooperative citizen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Detain and arrest are the same thing. If you aren’t under arrest, then you’re free to leave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What if I told you none of this should matter in how people in positions of authority treat you. The cops were wrong here. End of story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You’ve got plenty of replies already, but I don’t see one saying this. You do not have a requirement to be nice to the cops. You have to identify yourself in most states, and you have to provide license and registration. You do no have to (nor should you) answer questions or be polite. The reason they ask questions is to get you to contradict other statements or to otherwise incriminate yourself. Their job is not to protect people. It’s to arrest people. It’s shitty, but that’s the world we’re in. We should not defend the state agents who are given this much power over us. It is wrong and indefensible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Okay, I will argue that. Because it wouldn’t have happened to a white person. I’ve seen white people get away with doing a lot more than that to cops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve seen plenty of sovcit videos where white people get their windows smashed and dragged out of the car

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Yes. After doing a lot more than he did first.

Also, cops leave SovCits alone all the time because they don’t want to deal with that shit. Black people, not so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

On occasion, racist cops will violate white folks too. They’re never perfectly racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Like dodging charges for assaulting his girlfriend in college? Or how about when he beat his kid and told his wife, “Bitch, you should be too” after she said to him, “your son is terrified of you” the proceeded to threaten his wife to lie to the authorities so the charges would be dropped.

He acted like the fucking scum bag he is to the cops and he fuckin got what he deserved. Mother fucker has been dodging charges that any non-athletic white person would never get away with. This piece of shit deserves to get hog tied and strung up like s pinata for his son to break open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sorry, the cops did that to him because of things he did in the past and not at the time of arrest and he was not charged with those things at the time of arrest?

This sounds sort of like people excusing Kyle Rittenhouse because he killed a sex offender, as if he could have known that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

disgusting take

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have no problem with rich assholes getting knocked down a peg or two or three.

Keeping your window rolled down during a traffic stop is not an unreasonable demand, especially when it’s heavily tinted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He already provided his license. The officers job was to go back to his vehicle and prepare a citation. Instead they decided to go on a power trip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Yes it is

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I’ve seen videos of it happening to white people. They are all over youtube. I don’t think k he was wrong for first pulling him out, if the police just let you ignore them they couldn’t do their jobs, but after that he started power tripping.

Fuck the cops anyways though

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 510K

    Comments