242 points

“Your running mate, J.D. Vance, has said that you would veto [an abortion ban] if it did come to your desk,” said ABC News anchor Linsey Davis, referring to Vance’s statement last month that Trump “explicitly” told him that he would veto a federal abortion ban.

“Well I didn’t discuss it with J.D., in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me,” Trump said on the debate stage, before stumbling through the rest of his words. “We don’t have to discuss it.”

When JD Vance says that Trump “‘explicitly’ told him that he [Trump] would veto a federal abortion ban”, I believe JD Vance. Whatever was happening in the room at the time, Trump thought that that statement would be most beneficial to him personally in that moment. When Trump said the opposite thing in the debate, it’s because he thought that would be most beneficial to him personally in that moment.

The only thing that matters to Trump is what he thinks is best for him personally right now. Ethics are irrelevant. Legality is irrelevant. Continuity is irrelevant. Reality is irrelevant. He does not remember the past and he cannot conceive of the future. “Me, now” is the only thing that matters to him. There is no big picture. His entire universe is a singularity of “me, now.”

permalink
report
reply
77 points

The only thing that matters to Trump is what he thinks is best for him personally right now. Ethics are irrelevant. Legality is irrelevant. Continuity is irrelevant. Reality is irrelevant. He does not remember the past and he cannot conceive of the future. “Me, now” is the only thing that matters to him. There is no big picture. His entire universe is a singularity of “me, now.”

Best summary of Trump I’ve read yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

This is how he has always operated. People tend to forget.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I believe Trump when he said that he never discussed that with Vance.

It was actually John Barron!

That’s right, baby! The Barron is back and more senile than ever and he’s speaking exclusively to J.D. Vance.

^Good God, I fucking hate that this joke could be real^

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’re different people and totally don’t have two 2 other family members’ names, including his alter ego, Donnie “Johnny” Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“So, Mr. Barron-”

“No, I’ve told you so many times, Baron is my son.”

“Wait, are you saying that you’re actually Donald Trump?”

“No, no, of course not. I’m John Miller. Definitely not Trump. Never even met Trump.”

“Okaaaayyyy… Mr. Miller-”

“You don’t have to be so formal. Please, just call me President Trump.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In other words, this is classic strong narcissism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

I can explain it. Everyone is expendable to Donald Trump. This includes our country.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

And his kids! Especially his kids!

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Cause Trump is incapable of admitting fault. He wanted his supporters to kill his last VP because Pence recognized that America didn’t want Trump.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Let’s not give Pence more credit than he deserves. Pence didn’t decline to support Trump out of a sense of duty or because he cares about Americans, but because Dan Quayle (!) told him he had no choice in the matter:

Over and over, Pence asked if there was anything he could do.

‘Mike, you have no flexibility on this. None. Zero. Forget it. Put it away,’ Quayle told him.

Pence pressed again.

‘You don’t know the position I’m in,’ he said, according to the authors.

‘I do know the position you’re in,’ Quayle responded. ‘I also know what the law is. You listen to the parliamentarian. That’s all you do. You have no power.’

source: How Dan Quayle saved democracy. Yes, really.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Donald Trump’s response if asked:

"I’ve never met J.D. Vance. I don’t know who he is. People tell me he’s a fan, but I’ve never met him.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

You mean J P Mandel?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Funny, did you catch the part where he projected that on Harris? He accused her of claiming to have never met Biden 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s just a volunteer coffee boy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

JD knew what he signed up for. It’s being Trump’s bitch and not certifying the election results.

He’s the cushion for pushin in this election.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Well, when you couch it in those terms…

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Best comment I’ve read in this thread, sofa

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He’s n’ottoman to be trifled with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Seriously. How did he not understand that he’s the gimp in this relationship? Trump is going to dominate and abuse him. How does he not understand that’s what he signed up for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He understands…he’s a power bottom…he’s ok with the role.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

he would just lovea seat in the room where it happens

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments