This bot is spreading misinformation.

This bot is spreading rightwing propaganda.

This bot is spamming every post.

This bot is consistently downvoted.

This bot degrades the user experience.

Please ban it.

33 points

Totally agree.

As a temporary measure, I have blocked that bot from my feed.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Same, it does wonders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Is that thing still around? I thought it had been removed based on the feedback

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

It has been removed from some communities, but still in some.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

still around, the negative feedback is baseless so far

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Only one I saw removing it was news, even then it sounded more like removed until blows over

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What bot?

permalink
report
reply
29 points

media bias fact check bot, super annoying

permalink
report
parent
reply
-38 points

It’s a bot that inadvertently reminded Lemmy’s that they’re far left

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Far right people (MAGA) are so distant from the actual center that they see every leftist as far left. Yes, there are actual far-left communities (especially on Lemmygrad.ml) but the bulk of Lemmy leans mildly left-wing, especially by European standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-43 points

Western Europe is left wing, globally. That’s a very west-euro-centrist attitude you have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Just block it if you don’t like it?

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*

Why did you comment? If you followed your own logic then you would have just blocked me instead.

To be serious, I think it’s much better for the community if we do not allow misinformation bots to spam every post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Because this is the first thing I think I’ve seen you post and blocking everything you disagree with seems sort of stupid?

I think the bot has issues, but I hardly agree that it’s posting misinformation. Incomplete? Imperfect? You bet. But that’s not “misinformation” in any commonly understood meaning. I think the intent of providing additional context on information sources is laudable.

As someone with such a distaste for misinformation, how would you suggest fixing it? That’s a much more useful discussion than “BAN THE THING I PERSONALLY AND SUBJECTIVELY THINK IS BAD!!!” You obviously think misinformation is a problem, so why not suggest a solution?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Currently the bot’s media ratings come from just some guy, who is unaccountable and has an obvious rightwing bias.

If I were to suggest a fix, as you so rudely demanded, I would suggest making the ratings instead come from an open sourced and crowdsourced system. A system where everyone could give their inputs and have transparency, similar to an upvote/downvote system.

Such a system would take many hours to design and maintain, it is not something I personally am willing to contribute, nor would I ask it of any volunteers. This is why I believe the cleanest, easiest, and best solution is to simply ban the bot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

mbfc has been independently shown to be accurate.

what are you referring to?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Something so universally destructive to understanding is not an opt-out feature of any competent system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

“universally destructive to understanding”

So what you’re saying is that no one derives any use from the bot? Wow, with that kind of omniscience, I’d expect we could just ask you to judge every news source. Win-win for everyone I suppose if you’re up for it.

Now “generally destructive” would probably be better wording for us mere mortals, but stills seems to be a wildly generalized statement. Or maybe “inadequately precise” would be more realistic, but then that really takes the wind out of the sails to ban it, doesn’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

what are you basing that critique off of?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

His opinion as he can not provide any source than “trust me bro”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

So “rightwing” information is “propaganda” and “misinformation”? Is that what youre saying?

permalink
report
reply
25 points

I’m saying that if you take “rightwing” information and intentionally mislabel it as “leftwing”, yes that is misinformation.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy.world Support

!support@lemmy.world

Create post

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world



Community stats

  • 263

    Monthly active users

  • 837

    Posts

  • 6.1K

    Comments