1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
15 points

Living is easy with eyes closed/misunderstanding all you see

permalink
report
reply
29 points

When you don’t have anything new, use brute force. Just as GPT-4 was eight instances of GPT-3 in a trenchcoat, o1 is GPT-4o, but running each query multiple times and evaluating the results. o1 even says “Thought for [number] seconds” so you can be impressed how hard it’s “thinking.”.

This “thinking” costs money. o1 increases accuracy by taking much longer for everything, so it costs developers three to four times as much per token as GPT-4o.

Because the industry wasn’t doing enough climate damage already… Let’s quadruple the carbon we shit into the air!

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

They say it uses roughly the same amount of computing resources.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

they say a lot of things, yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Are you saying thats not true? Anything to substaniate your claim?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

and hot young singles in your area have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell

on the blockchain

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Happy to hear about anything that supports the idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m sure it being so much better is why they charge 100x more for the use of this than they did for 4ahegao, and that it’s got nothing to do with the well-reported gigantic hole in their cashflow, the extreme costs of training, the likely-looking case of this being yet more stacked GPT3s (implying more compute in aggregate for usage), the need to become profitable, or anything else like that. nah, gotta be how much better the new model is

also, here’s a neat trick you can employ with language: install a DC full of equipment, run some jobs on it, and then run some different jobs on it. same amount of computing resources! amazing! but note how this says absolutely nothing about the quality of the job outcomes, the durations, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

also discussed over here

permalink
report
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 502

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators