95 points

He spent months/years going on and on and on about how Biden is too old, he can’t see, he gets confused. Meanwhile trumps only outcomes of this situation are either

A) He finds men attractive. I personally don’t care if he does, but I know his base would be mad at that, and his butt-buddy putin would be furious.

B) He legitimately can’t tell the difference between men and women in his old age. In which case he’s every bit of the exact same problems he was accusing Biden of for years. I guess he forgot that he’s only 3 years younger than Biden, and time is always moving forward, which means that 3 years after trump accuses Biden of being too old, trump will be equally as too old.

Oh, who am I kidding? These people don’t care about hypocrosy! Well…they do…but only when the other side does it, so they can benefit.

permalink
report
reply
80 points

Honestly, he probably had no idea who he was, got told some prolific person (who?) was endorsing him by his campaign managers and just went with female pronouns from the name ‘Nicky’ and called them hot to hype them up in some fucked up way?

Because he doesn’t give a shit about anyone, he isn’t going to put a second to learn about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

This is the most likely answer imo

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I could absolutely see that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly, his endorsements are so shallow, he sees their name for the first time on stage

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I mean if I had to choose between this dude and Laura Loomer . . .

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thankfully, we don’t have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Nicky Jam does have kids, so he isn’t a faux pa after all.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I fucking love you

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Well, now he’s obligated to get a sex change, isn’t that how things work in Trumpland now?

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Yup. He just needs to go to school, and come home with an operation. That’s exactly how it works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

that’s so funny, imagine how disappointed trans people would be if this were even close to true after years of jumping through hoops. “this could’ve taken one afternoon‽”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Or jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I find it hilarious that anybody would go on stage and endorse political candidate who has never met them.

Might as well have just said “I’m hoping to sell my music to racists and establish myself as ‘one of the good ones’”.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Why would meeting a political candidate be necessary to understand their policy positions and ability, advance then, and relative merits of the alternative? Democracy wouldn’t work if that were needed.

Who’d have thought the profit motive would lead to outcomes that aren’t always for the benefit of society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Go fuck yourself, Nicky Jam.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments