I’ve been using Consent-O-Matic which works pretty well but built into the browser? Wow.

-3 points

Firefox bringing an actual useful feature? Not removing one? Not bringing in more telemetry and reporting? Not doing more restrictions? Not copying Chrome?

Am I dead?

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

It’s so unfortunate that Firefox on Android, for some reason, never worked well with password managers (as I understand it, it doesn’t support the APIs that Android has for them). Sometimes it’ll trigger the manager, more often, it won’t. Infuriating and a deal breaker for me.

I’ll give it another go, maybe this has been improved recently.

Edit gave it another crack, gosh, it actually works now!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I use the firefox password manager personally. Not sure if that makes me an idiot or not but it works well and I trust mozilla.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It doesn’t make you an idiot. It is a free service that offers every service a premium password manager does. The real idiots are the people paying mothly for the same thing…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Works great here with KeePass2Android on Android 12. If for some reason automatic filling doesn’t work switching to the KP2A Keyboard and filling the username and password takes about 5 seconds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Works fine with 1Password also, although the experience can somewhat clunky (I use Mull, not Firefox). Planning to migrate to KeePassDX soon, so I’m glad to hear that it should still work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Same than others, I just use Firefox in dekstop and mobile with Bitwarden and it works fantastic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How do you mean?

I click into a password field, I get a “Fill with KeepassDX”-button above the keyboard, I press that, unlock the database, I’m done and it autofills. You just need to select the Keepass-app of your choice as the password-autofill app in the Android settings, but that’s independent of your browser choice anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I use bitwarden and it works quite well there, the most annoying part are websites that split login and password prompts so that you have to use fill-in feature twice

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I had to use the accessibility features of bitwarden to get it to run, but they improved and on many web pages you can now auto fill passwords from the keyboard integration

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I use Firefox both on mobile and on desktop with Bitwarden for myself and LastPass for work, both work with very little problems

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

i rarely have any issues with bitwarden. give it another crack!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have to agree. Works better than on Chrome, IMHO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Been using “I still don’t care about cookies”, but native support would be legendary

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Wait, I thought that just accepted everything? Because if you don’t care about cookies, you’d be fine with anything, no? But “rejecting” cookie banners to me implies rejecting cookies which is different if I’m not mistaken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The name is confusing but it works very well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not just the name, from the description I’d also assume that it accepts cookies or at least most of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It accepts all or minimal depending on the website.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“In most cases, the add-on just blocks or hides cookie related pop-ups. When it’s needed for the website to work properly, it will automatically accept the cookie policy for you (sometimes it will accept all and sometimes only necessary cookie categories, depending on what’s easier to do).”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That extension is just hiding the banner, same as if you blocked it with ublock cosmetic filtering

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Not 100% true according to the description on that page. It just hides the banner if possible but it will automatically accept some or even all cookies and tracking if it is required for the site to function. And their choice if they accept some or all depends on “whichever is easier to do”.

And functionality of the website could be social media or video embedding which might be “required for the site to function” in the eyes of the extension maintainers. But which will send data to Facebook, Google, and the likes. That could be okay depending on what your stance but a good thing to be aware of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just be careful, those kind of features can sometimes break sites.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I use firefox clear and it doesn’t even haven cocky support.(longer than one session)

permalink
report
reply
-7 points
*
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s not how cookies work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

cocky

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 936

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments

Community moderators