Chief justice reportedly took unusually active role in three recent supreme court decisions centering on Trump

John Roberts Jr used his position as the US supreme court’s chief justice to urge his colleagues to rule quickly – and in favor – of Donald Trump ahead of the decision that granted him and other presidents immunity for official acts, according to a New York Times investigation published on Sunday.

The new report provides details about what was happening behind the scenes in the country’s highest court during the three recent supreme court decisions centering on – and generally favoring – the Republican former president.

Based on leaked memos, documentation of the proceedings, and interviews with court insiders, the Times report suggests that Roberts – who was appointed to the supreme court during Republican George W Bush’s presidency – took an unusually active role in the three cases in question. And he wrote the majority opinions on all three.

14 points

Wonder what the kompromat on Roberts is.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

10M rubles probably

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Isn’t that only like $20? :one quick google search later: It’s like $110k.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s not even quality RV money…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

10M rubles is $109,646.47

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

Seems like maybe we don’t pay these judges nearly enough if they can be bought so easily. Why don’t we just give them an unlimited spending account. Basically make them never want for anything so they can be immune to bribery. It’s a lifelong appointment to serve the country why should they be bound by a paycheck?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Sometimes bribery isn’t about the money, but the prestige.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Like elon musk is not bought out.

Do the inverse, elected for 5 or 7 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

He’s a fool and not a natural born citizen, also his brain is broken.

I feel we would win a fight to pay the justices more, more easily than it would to change their appointments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Pay them unlimited, yeah that wouldn’t attract the wrong people, like at all, no no not the slightest, only incorruptible well meaning people for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And instead of paying them, pay 500 toddlers $2 each to kick them in the shins their entire career

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Which makes them incapable of being bought? Look at any senator you care to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At least when they’re bought then it won’t be for the rest of my fucking life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Maybe we start with an enforceable code of conduct instead of…you know… a blank check?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But, they’d choke on that!

In any case, I’m not sure Robert’s did this for a bribe. I think he might be a True Believer™️, maybe not in trump but in all the conservative bullshit trump enabo

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Get out

permalink
report
reply
20 points

So what you’re saying is that Roberts is the orange idiot’s little butt boy?

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments