7 points

So there’s this conspiracy theory about the bourgeois being lizard people and climate change is actually them terraforming earth to be more to their liking.

I’ve never seriously considered such an absurd idea, but considering that we are at a critical time for climate change and their response is to accelerate it makes me think there may be something to this…

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Step 1: Come up with our own conspiracy theories

Step 2: in a concentrated effort for the right to tell us how corporations would never hurt us, they inadvertently debunk all of their antisemitic conspiracies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Destroying civilization because I can’t be bothered to copy and paste from stack overflow

permalink
report
reply

The tech bro response is to say that you can’t stop innovation or pivot to fossil fuels and say “well what about them?”

permalink
report
reply

or pivot to fossil fuels and say “well what about them?”

Boy I wonder where all the energy powering these data-centers is coming from. how that energy is being generated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sometimes I noticed they get super emotional over it and start pining nostalgia for something that still exists.

: “Hey! Fossil fuels are great they started the Industrial Revolution so we owe them big time, that’s why we must keep using them! This does not apply to trains though.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

They’d also be kind of wrong factually, because barring coal, yet still critical alongside it, what greased and fueled the industrial revolution and its commodity production was the mass-murdering of whales to the point of almost extincting every single species of whale on the planet (and properly extincting uncountable intermediate species that relied on whalefall or nutrient cycling because whales are keystone species) extracting and using their bodily compounds to make things like ‘whale oil;’ and we owe them more than we could ever give them, but least of all to not keep destroying the planet, fucking up the oceans (and making them so painfully loud it disrupts their ability to communicate and hunt and contributes to beachings), killing them with fishing bycatch and with commercial boat strikes, and non-arctic-indigenous industrial peoples who still hunt them. Which is all economics as always.

We only stopped (at least, to that level) industrial-murdering them after discovering the modern fossil fuels (petroleum et al) and realizing that it was easier to pull millions-year-dead plankton and peat and trees that got their energy condensed and liquefied because fungus hadn’t evolved to break them down and utilize it yet — than it was to find the previously-numerous-but-now-scant beings (of incredible intelligence, complex capability, compassion, and culture [even among different speices], much of which was lost to their communities forever); who also sometimes escaped or fought back and killed people and made crews have to eat each other (“Whale attack” they say. Whale self-defense).

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Now we know why Kamala spent so much time at the debate talking about natural gas.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

The worst thing about this is we’re going to destroy the earth to make shitty pictures and stupid nonsense articles.

I can at least understand cars and industry as they’re kinda necessary for the vast improvements to quality of life but AI is just making things more shit.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

I can at least understand cars and industry as they’re kinda necessary for the vast improvements to quality of life but AI is just making things more shit.

A few credulous rubes might beg to differ if the treat printer says “I love you senpai” just convincingly enough (gotta burn that many more acres of forest!).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’re not the problem really. I empathize with those lonely enough to seek companionship in AI.

AI wouldn’t be getting 1/10th of the support if business owners weren’t planning on using it to replace entry-level jobs, that’s why we’re burning the forests down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Definitely, and take this from someone trying to escape the reserve army of labor.

You’d think America, where work is sacred, it would be an act of blasphemy for an employer to abolish work in certain levels. But no, it’s “innovation” and no one cares that entry-level jobs are a thing of a past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

They’re not the problem really. I empathize with those lonely enough to seek companionship in AI.

I would be more sympathetic for that desire if it wasn’t so often presented in a contempt-for-living-beings format, as is often the case, including on this site sometimes. That misanthropic sentiment isnt new, but the treat printers have galvanized it.

permalink
report
parent
reply