Shitendo strikes again

25 points

In case anyone was wondering, Pocketpair has already announced they’re going to fight Nintendo.

Unlike a certain other company that folded like a coward in 2 days after a simple C&D letter, took their money and ran.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Lol this is hilarious. “Coward”. Have you ever looked down the barrel of an enterprise legal team, and seen just the opening bill to defend team? I haven’t, but I’m aware that it is a huge and expensive endeavor and “bravery” has nothing to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You mean what Pocketpair is doing right now? They’re both businesses who should have known they would come up against Nintendo at some point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Pocket pair has money. Pal world was a smash hit and sold millions of copies and they could still be buried under legal fees by a behemoth like Nintendo via bullshit like repeated appeals

Edit: in the us at least, not sure if this is suit is in Japan only, seems it was filed in tokyo. See the downfall of gawker for a US example

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The claims are very different. I’m not moving the goalposts here, it’s critical to the situation and was always available information.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s not cowardice to refuse to fight a completely unwinnable battle. You only fight if you can win something. Otherwise, take the inevitable loss and spend the resources elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It wasn’t completely unwinnable, it was legally untested waters and could have gone either way, had they fought and won they would have even set a precedent for future emulation projects.

This wasn’t some 2 person team project. It was a company with real money that could have fought and laid the foundation for the future safety of emulation. And because they were a company all liability laid with the company with no personal liability risk to the founders. But they didn’t, they settled in less than 2 days, tucked tail and ran with the remaining money.

Cowards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Who did that? I forgot

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yuzu, and before any of their apologists come on here, they were a company that reportedly had millions in the bank and could have fought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Yuzu were scuzzy as fuck. There’s a thread in /r/emulation where one of their members admits to the project stealing code from Ryujinx and then whines like a little baby over getting called out on it, claiming that it’s okay to steal open-source code without attribution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

What’s millions to Nintendo? Yuzu’s a business at it’s core. they are designed to make money

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh yeaaaa they had a whole patreon pulling in like 50k a month right? Wild

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

nintendo and friends are out of line. Undisclosed patents being infringed sounds bullshit, and game patents are even more bullshit. tony hawk isn’t the only skating game. cod isn’t the only shooting game. Pokémon and palworld certainly aren’t the only creature capture and exploit for human benefit games.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point

Which one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just checking haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Either strike right after release or don’t strike at all. Palworld was already starting to lose steam. Nintendo is doing a Streisand effect.

permalink
report
reply
-45 points

Fuck Nintendo but they do have a point here. You can only get so far with artistic inspiration until it becomes straight up plagiarism.

permalink
report
reply
46 points
*

They are suing over a patent though (ie, a technology). What you are talking about is a copyright suit.

Unfortunately we don’t know what patents Nintendo is suing over. And I struggle to think of a patent issue that would generate a good faith claim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, from I’ve read they haven’t quoted any specific patent to anyone. They don’t have good grounds, they just want it shut down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Looks like it’s over the game mechanics of ‘releasing a creature into a 3d environment and having it perform a contextual task’ & ‘having a rideable mount switch to a different rideable mount depending on terrain’

I don’t think either of these would work in the US, because you can’t protect game mechanics here, but I’m not sure about Japan’s take.

Edit: I missed that this was still under speculation at the time of the post:

https://bulbagarden.net/threads/nintendo-and-the-pokemon-company-jointly-file-lawsuit-for-patent-infringement-against-palworld-creator-pocketpair-inc-in-the-tokyo-district-court.303354/

Based on searching of Japanese patent databases, initial speculation is that these may include (but is not necessarily limited to) patents relating to game mechanics and gameplay features from Pokémon: Legends Arceus, and may include patents such as one for throwing and using Poké Balls in a 3D space (JP,2023-092953,A); and one for automatically switching between ride Pokémon as a player transitions between different terrain, such as between air and the ground (JP,2023-092954,A).

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

They haven’t actually said what the alleged infringement is yet, so we can’t know for sure what excuse they’re going to come up with. They haven’t even told Pocketpair!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Kinda wild that you could patent a super basic mechanic that pretty much anyone could come up with

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Okay they need to lose that first one wtf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Presumably, since Nintendo isn’t claiming copyright infringement, Palworld hasn’t crossed the line of plagiarism. They are all legally distinct designs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It doesn’t resemble plagiarism in any way.

They are fully entitled to imitate the art style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t agree with that at all - that’s how art works. You take ideas and techniques and copy them, adding your own twist in the process. Art is about more than the aesthetic - the backstory is what gives it value. Stealing that is plagiarism, everything else is artistic inspiration… If you add nothing new you’ve made a cheap knockoff, which is very different from plagiarism

Palworld has its own lore, its own type system, its own battle mechanics, and as far as gameplay it’s nothing like Pokemon. All it has in common is many creatures you capture in a ball, with designs largely based on IRL animals and Japanese folklore. They’ve made something new no matter how you slice it

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 79K

    Comments

Community moderators