.

8 points
*

Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition

  • very stable - I haven’t managed to break it yet
  • lets me focus on getting shit done.
  • very little system maintenance required, just applying updated
  • feels like there’s a gui for everything
permalink
report
reply
-9 points
*

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

incapable of instructing.

you’re running around insulting people for doing exactly what you asked in exactly the format you provided

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Arch Linux

permalink
report
reply
5 points
  • Great Wiki
  • It just works comparing to other distros like Ubuntu
  • My home PC for programming, I just love it
  • I’m not a heavy gamer but games are much better on Arch Linux, including Steam Deck
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sometimes, I feel sick of such simplistic questions. They look like they’re just for triggering people to response.

Alpine Linux Hyperbola OpenBSD

Last is not linux based though.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points
*

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

If you want people to help you, it would be good if you weren’t so condescending…

Edit: Grammar.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Arch

permalink
report
reply

It’s lightweight and efficient

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Arch is also not more lightweight than other distributions.

With Arch, unlike other distributions, there are no extra dev packages. Thus, everything is present in a single package, so they require more storage space.

Arch’s packages also have fixed dependencies on other packages, which in turn have other dependencies. So you can’t only install what you actually want, which is often claimed. For example, I would like to uninstall various Bluetooth packages, but I can’t because they are dependencies for packages I use.

The basic installation including base-devel requires more than 1 GB of storage space without the GUI. Some distributions need less including the GUI.

permalink
report
parent
reply

There are indeed more lightweight distros. But if you want something that “works out of the box”, contrary to, say, PuppyLinux or Gentoo, then Arch is interesting.

It is however harder to configure than Fedora, Manjaro, SuSE, etc. It’s a great inbetween.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Thanks to Pacman and the AUR there is an extensive list of apps to install very easily.

And you don’t have to keep the build dependencies on your system, so you have more disk space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Personally, I currently prefer Arch for the following reasons.

  • AUR
  • The Wiki
  • The many vanilla packages
  • Because you can easily create your own packages with the PKBGUILD files.
  • Because, based on my own experience, Arch is quite usable despite the current packages.

If I had to choose another distribution, it would definitely be OpenSuse. Their rolling version, Tumbleweed, is also highly recommended.

permalink
report
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 6.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 176K

    Comments