A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on book bans took a racy turn Tuesday, as Republican senators and a witness read scenes of various sexual content into the congressional record to defend the banning of multiple titles from U.S. schools.

The hearing on book bans was called as multiple Republican-led states have made it easier for books to be challenged in classrooms and as school board meetings have been flooded with arguments on what is appropriate for children to read.

The American Library Association said the number of book challenges in the United States doubled between 2021 and 2022.

Republicans and Democrats found common ground in agreeing there are books that are inappropriate for some children, but Democrats said the argument that all the books under discussion are sexually explicit is a scapegoat for the issue.

“No one is advocating for sexually explicit content to be available in an elementary school library or in [the] children’s section of the library,” Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said. “That’s a distraction from the real challenge. I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home. Every student deserves access to books that reflect their experiences and help them better understand who they are.”

33 points

These people are wild. American first and freedom of speach, then something says something they don’t like and its ban this, make this illegal.

permalink
report
reply
-84 points

So you want elementary schools to have sexually explicit books in their libraries? Do you have kids of your own?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

“No one is advocating for sexually explicit content to be available in an elementary school library or in [the] children’s section of the library,” Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said. “That’s a distraction from the real challenge. I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home. Every student deserves access to books that reflect their experiences and help them better understand who they are.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

So whats going on is these idiots aren’t aware of what a “book ban” actually is, and are wasting everyones time.

Now Ive wasted my time, simple case of dumb govt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

This is Lemmy. Of course they don’t have kids. Most of these people are severely emotionally stunted teenagers going through a Che Guevara phase.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Not you though, right? You’re special.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I have a now 6th grader and it’s called parenting. I decide what is appropriate and not appropriate for my child. Not someone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Dude’s a troll (or just can’t read) and it isn’t worth engaging with him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

You didn’t argue against him. You shamed him.

You shamed him for arguing an objective truth. Your children will grow in a land without freedom because you shamed people who tried to defend it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I WANT MORAL OUTRAGE ABOUT TOPICS THAT DON’T MATTER!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I find it impressive how you managed to quote the article while clearly not having read it

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yes and yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I have a kid of my own. I want her to have access to all kinds of book content, sexual or not.

Sexual content in books is not going to ruin children. The vast majority are mature enough to handle it and it will more often than not help teach them to navigate the real world with more nuance than they would otherwise.

It can give words to the actions and feelings they come across, say for example, when a child is sexually assaulted and isn’t aware that it’s wrong, so they don’t speak up about it.

The books are not the problem. Books are never the problem and banning them is a huge infringement of the government on people’s freedom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

They are suspiciously silent about violence and gore.

Apparently understanding procreation exists is more dangerous than a heaping helping of the ol’ ultraviolence.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Yes, sadly there’s more money to be made from violence. Politicians can rake in political donations from fear, get lobbyist support (bribery) from arms manufacturers and watch your stock portfolio swell from voting for gun ownership and war. How do we stop this madness?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The Walking Dead TV series didn’t show much of the sexual assault/rape from the comic series but all the zombie gore was fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

That’s something us Europeans find weird all the time. Splatterfest 9000 Ultra Bloody Gore edition is fine, but God forbid there is a literal mm of female areola in screen for a fraction of a second!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I like the glib answer that the USA was founded by religious nut jobs so uptight and conservative that they got kicked out of Europe for being so annoying - the puritans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s amusing to me is that one of the stated reasons the religious nut jobs were persecuted was for their anti-war beliefs. Somehow that script got flipped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Several times from several places.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Wait until they find out about fan fiction. Hope they get hard reading it to each other on the house floor.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

How many senators popped viagra in anticipation of this hearing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wait until they find out about apples airdrop and androids nearby share. By which one kid can spread porn to an entire lunchroom.
But sure, let’s worry about sex scenes in books.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-57 points

Parents have a right to decide which materials are taught to their kids. I know parental rights make some of you uncomfortable, but you’ll just have to find a way to get over it. I won’t allow my young kids to be given literal child porn.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Lol, let me guess hetro teen romance with heavy sexual innuendos is fine for your child?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Romeo and Juliet is a classic!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Parents have a right to decide which materials are taught to their kids

  • So if my family is a holocaust denying family I can get books about holocaust banned?
  • Or if I’m a young earth creationist I can get books on history and evolution banned?
  • Perhaps if I’m a flat earther then I can get books on geology banned? Especially the ones about vulcanos which I liked so much when I was a kid?
  • If I don’t want my children to read about incest I can get the bible banned?

Is there any limit to that or will every book be banned on the future?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Is there any limit to that or will every book be banned on the future?

Yes. Because books make you literate. And literate folks don’t vote against their interests nearly as much as illiterate ones

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

People like you screaming about parental rights always forget that parents who don’t want their children taught theocracy or white supremacy are in the majority.

If you actually believe that your child is being handed books with literal child porn, you ought to be contacting the police and FBI immediately, not posting links to it on the fediverse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I won’t allow my young kids to be given

That’s a page from Gender Queer. Which is a book for 18 and up. Nobody is trying to give it to young kids you absolute spanner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

And your rights end with you and your child. Imposing your puritanical beliefs on society is the antithesis to a freedom and violates everyone else’s rights. Perhaps you’d be more comfortable living in Iran or some other religious state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Nobody is being forced to read any of the books you reactionaries are worried about. If you don’t want your crotch goblin reading Genderqueer you’re perfectly within your rights to forbid that but you don’t and shouldn’t have the right to deny someone else’s kid from actually developing their own healthy sexuality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’re allowed to not let your kid go to public schools if they’re teaching things you find offensive. You’re welcome to be that weirdo homeschooling kids; or paying to send them to private schools that do all the brainwashing for you.

There’s your parental rights. What you should not be allowed to do is decide what books are available to children-not-your-own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You’re not allowing any kids to be given materials you don’t approve of. Do your own damn job and don’t press it on others who may disagree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Kids have a right to be taught what they need to know as adults even if it is something their parents don’t want them to learn.

Kids need to be protected from those who want them to be ignorant, whether it is a parent or a politician.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Wish I could set a remindme! Bot for a decade from now when your kids experiment and hunt down this shit on their own and the fallout from that. Have fun with that one

Also, have you read the Bible? Kid fucking, beastiality and genocide abound. I assume you’re cool with that tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Don’t forget the incest committed by the kids of Noah after the flood, and the killing of kids by bears for being kids and making fun of travelers clothes, or sacrificing children to prove devotion… nothing more comforting for bedtime stories, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Parents have a right to decide which materials are taught to their kids

So why give that right wholesale to the government? Isn’t it the right of the parents?

Oh wait, I’ve used logic here and apparently you only have the ‘appeal to emotion’ chat style unlocked. Sad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not only is nobody forcing your kids to do anything, you’re the one trying to force everyone else to not be allowed to do what they want. Extremely unamerican.

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

Would you look at, the Bible is missing from their evidence of sexually explicit books read to children. All the prof you need that this has nothing to do with child safety

permalink
report
reply
23 points
2 points

Oh how I miss the old Cracked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Ezekiel 23:20 ftw

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 469K

    Comments