84 points

That smoking is bad for them. You’d just be banging your head against their socially-acceptable-at-the-time drug addiction.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Person from 2020 magically appearing in 2090 and being told caffeine/excessive sugar is now regulated and ID checked

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How would you regulare excessive sugar? Have a weekly quota of sugar that can be contained in food you purchase? Are they going to ban growing fruits?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Taxes on sugar beets and standards for manufactured foodstuffs, I’d assume. Chopping down the apple tree in your front yard is clearly absurd (or is it? I’m not sure what’s too absurd to happen anymore…), but saying that any loaf of bread with more than 20g of sugar must be labeled “cake” and taxed as such? That type of thing has already been happening for years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ration books. If they’re from the 50s they’ll probably understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’d be okay without excess sugar, but I’m a firm believer that it is virtually impossible (for me) to function in modern society without caffeine. Our bodies want to sleep when we’re tired, but I have never had a job where I could say “I’m tired. I’m going to nap and come back in 8 hours.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You know you can sleep at night and work during the day right?

Also napping isn’t sleeping for 8 hours.

You (and a lot of people tbf) need caffeine to stay awake mostly because your body gets used to it and then can’t function without it. Plenty of people do just fine without caffeine or other substances. It’s not magic and we’re not super humans or anything. We just don’t drink caffeine multiple times a day every day

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Grew up in the 50s and 60s. Had a pediatrician who chain-smoked, and had ashtrays all over her office literally overflowing with butts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Seems like this was already know in '47

https://inv.in.projectsegfau.lt/watch?v=65_-vNtWLLs

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I read your response and immediately thought of homosexuality. That would be hard to explain, why now we have a big pride parade celebrating it. (Im gay, dont com at me!)

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The Internet, social media and how we can access absolutely everything from this tiny device

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Plenty of SF writers lived in that era and they predicted the Internet.

For example: I can name the writer and his novel where he predicted AI writing engines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Can you really though?

I mean, no jokes though, why don’t you just name him instead of saying you could? Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Found it and translated the relevant section:

So it is necessary to write something. It’s seemingly very simple - to write something. You stand in front of the conceptor, press a few keys at random and after ten seconds a slate pops up with a ready-made scheme, let’s say a novella, with developed plots, psychological character, the duration of the plot, an attractive point… Then the slate is thrown into a dialogoscript, which, having filled in the empty framework of the scheme with a record of the “verbal meat”, feeds it further, to the visionary and phonocombi… Then it is only necessary to teach the actors personalities, roles and twist it all with a copiosynchronization camera. Novelvision is ready.

Do remember that it comes from OLD times. Certain words are archaic now, certain were invented to sound futuristic and have no good equivalent.

…and I’d really prefer for people to come out with their own findings of similar predictions. The more the merrier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For real “so and so wrote about this” instead of whatever ambiguous nonsense that was lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Too broad a question.

Select a specific person.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Does the person need to have died in the 50s or do we just take the 50s version of them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m fine with either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Alright who wants to take a stab at explaining to Joseph Stalin, Russia’s struggle with taking Ukraine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Elvis Presley.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Brainfuck syntax and its application.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d prefer Whitespace

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

His name is Steve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Alan Turing

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Interesting question. Given how intelligent he was, I don’t think that modern tech would be very hard for him to grasp.

I think that he’d find it difficult to understand how people the likes of Musk waste so much time and money on bullshit like Twitter instead of changing the world for better, with a snap of their fingers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, he would be hard to explain technology stuff to just because I’m pretty sure he’d understand it better than I did within a few minutes and start asking questions that would put me totally out of my depth

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He’d probably have some good things that would be hard to grasp for him. He could easily move somewhere where he won’t be shunned for his sexual preferences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, imagine all the trauma and internalized homophobia to unpack, it would be a lot

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The internet. Youd first have to explain computers, and thats not easy. Going further just compounds the issue.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

This thing does math really really fast.

Cause it does math fast, we can use math to have it draw pictures like how you plot a graph.

These picture drawing math machines also talk to each other like a really fast phone call, all the time. So we can transfer pictures and words between them.

Also it makes phone calls but it doesn’t need a cable.

Also the pictures it can send are slowly eroding the foundations of our society like tides against a cliff, and we all feel the ground getting thinner beneath our feet, but if we turn off the water, like 5 people will be marginally less rich. And having 5 slightly less obscenely rich people is deemed unacceptable in our increasingly surreal society.

I think that’s a pretty good explanation for a person from the 50s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

🤯

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’ve got funny words, magic man

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Mobile phones and the internet.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

mobile phones are easy, in 50s some of people would be familiar with (ww2 era) military radios that could transmit voice, just explain that you don’t need to carry entire backpack of radio equipment, everything fits in this small device

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There was also Dick Tracy and his 2-way wrist radio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It […] used an aerial wire that ran up the inside of the wearer’s sleeve

oof ouchie

have you ever seen a RF burn?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

and also we managed to reduce power use few thousand times, and we use frequencies some 1000x higher than these old radios, up to 15000x if we insist

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mobile phones as phones—yes, maybe that’s easy. But that we don’t actually use them to TALK to people would be weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

explain that as portable fax machines. google search or any social media would be a complete mystery however

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ask Lemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.world

Create post

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for ‘how do I?’, type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.

Please don’t post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 322K

    Comments