9 points

Hopfield is enormously influential, I don’t mind him getting a major prize at all. Physics seems weird tho.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

The “everything is physics” crowd is awfully silent right now 🤔

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Lucky 10000: this integration started decades ago. You may have heard of “computational trinitarianism” or read Baez & Stay 2009. The current big listing of correspondences is called the computational trilogy. Don’t let the Nobel committee’s foolishness blind you to the genuine connections between computer science and physics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

AI is poisoning science development. It is not necessary that everything uses AI ffs!!

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Nobel prize in Physics for attempting to use physics in AI but it didn’t really work very well and then one of the guys working on a better more pure mathematics approach that actually worked and got the Turing Award for the latter, but that’s not what the prize is for, while the other guy did some other work, but that is not what the prize is for. AI will solve all physics!!!111

permalink
report
reply
22 points

ah yes, the dynamite guy award show, a fine institution of the ages

permalink
report
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 502

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators