-51 points

Funny how the people who claim to oppose racism are up in arms that race isn’t the driving factor in districting. Almost like they’re not opposed to racism at all, they just want to use it for their own ends.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Opposing districting that is explicitly designed to lessen the voting power of black people isn’t opposing racism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Racism already is a driving factor in how Republicans draw district maps. There is no other plausible explanation for why there has never been more than one Black representative in a state in which over a quarter of voters are Black.

It’s not racist to be capable of identifying the effects of racism. It’s not racist to try to eliminate the effects of racism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you block this user your browsing experience will improve

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Have you read about a decade before the 1960s?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They fully recognize race is a factor. They are only recognizing two distant areas with a high population of black people shouldn’t be one district. If you look at the map it’s grouping two random areas together that’s are not even close and it just happens to be areas with more black people. Democrats recognize race and that it plays a factor in this country, republicans deny race exists and that it plays a factor while designing a system that systematically targets people of color.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

And yet, they’re 10th in line holding their hands out for federal funding. Seems like it’s time to shut off the tap and see how strong their disgusting ass convictions are.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

And new instance is created … Alabama’s Disgusting Ass Convictions.

jk lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Never go full ADAC

permalink
report
parent
reply
-75 points

why do the Democrats want to redistrict? is it because they’re losing? some other reason?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

If you block this user your browsing experience will improve

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Do sea lions like fish?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Why wouldn’t you want to redistrict when it’s been gamed for minority rule?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Why do Republicans want to disobey a court order? Is it because they are lawbreakers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

1/7 districts (14%) were majority black, but the population is 27% black. The argument was that the black voters were unfairly concentrated into one district and diluted into the other 6 so as to limit their effective representation in the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-64 points

who forced them to live in that district? couldnt they just move? presumably they’d move somewhere else, not stay in Alabama

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Why should they move?it’s their homes, their lives. Should we just make a state for black people? Or instead represent the people fairly. If you look at the maps it’s pretty obvious they cut the districts to give black people less representation

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Ribbit

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If you suddenly got notified that the place you live has been redistricted to put you in a district which reduces your voting power, would you be ok with your “solution” of uprooting your entire life, changing jobs, finding a new place to stay, and re-registering to vote? Or would you maybe pursue a less completely-insane solution to the problem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Couldn’t you just move to Florida and live with DuhSantis?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the point of having elections is to represent the people who live in a place, not changing the demographics of a place to reflect the government a political party wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

If there are no consequences here…that means states can just keep enforcing gun bans SCOTUS deemed unconstitutional and that all rulings from the Supreme Court have no merit.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

As there are no real consequences for the corruption in the supreme court, there will be none for those who ignore their decisions.

“Now let them enforce it” -Some racist dickhead president the Orange One idolizes-

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 483K

    Comments