Appears to be Hetzner for now, wouldn’t be surprised if all VPS get affected eventually.

21 points

Im very curious about what was the actual violation

permalink
report
reply
42 points

It’s about the server access sellers, but to block a whole major VPS instead of accounts that commit the violation is kinda absurd.

It looks like another step towards further restricting what users can do with their servers, local or virtual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Yeah I got sick of feeling like it wasn’t my plex server even though I have plex lifetime pass. Have stopped using it in favour of jellyfin

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I tried out Plex when I was first setting up my media server and having to do a bunch of stuff through Plex servers was one of the main reasons I jumped ship immediately. The hardware is in my house, the files are in my house, I never want it to leave my house, I kept thinking why the hell do I need to mess around with Plex accounts and online connections??

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You know it’s kind of funny and damn near every piece of surprise him software is getting into controversies like this but you’ve never heard of a free and open source software ever having these problems

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

More reasons I’m glad we switched to Jellyfin

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sever access sellers are kinda shitty and not what Plex should be about. IMO.

I’m not saying this action is good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, you’re paying for PaaS (Piracy as a Service).

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

So these are people that sell access to (presumably media-filled) existing Plex installations?

That does seem like a problematic thing to do and I understand why Plex wants to shut that down.

But surely their tons of online-integrations and user-account-requirements gives them other tools at their disposal than outright blocking a major VPS provider, that seems insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So they should block only those accounts, not everyone.

Easy to see, no? A filter like "VPS+tons of users+tons of media+tons of concurrent visits from all over the world "

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If the vast majority of people on they host were selling access it makes sense. Users don’t want to hear it but Plex has to shield themselves from lawsuits. If you willfully let people break the law with your product as a feature you have no argument in court. Same goes for why they add all these features they core users don’t want. They need a reason to argue that they don’t just make money on piracy. FOSS doesn’t usually get sued though, but nothing is preventing it. Everyone needs to be careful and if your going to illegally download movies don’t be greedy and sell access to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

I never understood this, it’s your selfhosted server but you kind of don’t own it and depend on them, so you just have an application which depends on a their service which means plex isn’t 100% selfhostable, correct?

permalink
report
reply
48 points

The problem is that they want to route control through their own servers for making sure you can’t use some of the extra features without paying.

A few years back they dropped some clients (including the one for my old TV) because they were dropping support for legacy SSL ciphers on their servers - and those devices didn’t have support for the new ciphers. This is a pretty stupid dependency due to the way they want to do things - so I moved to jellyfin back then, and have been encouraging people to drop plex ever since.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

To be fair, old ssl isn’t really ssl at all & considered to be a vulnerability by a lot of libraries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But also on the other side, we’re talking about just media consumption, not banking or other sensitive data

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Without them forcing you to go through their server for user authentication it’d be a thing local to your network - where it wouldn’t really matter. Without that stupid requirement you also could just keep unsupported clients running by yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

A few years back they dropped some clients (including the one for my old TV) because they were dropping support for legacy SSL ciphers on their servers

TLS 1.0/1.1? Those were deprecated and dropped by the IETF with RFC 8996. You can’t even get a certificate using 1.0/1.1 anymore unless you are self-signing.

You can also allow unauthenticated users on certain networks, usually limited to your local nets. But I do agree that doesn’t solve the problem. I’d love to allow users to optionally use local authentication with, eg, Authelia, something built in, or an LDAP backend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

Plex has been hostile towards self-hosting since the very beginning. They have been asked to add local authentication for more than 10 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Yup, as soon as they started the mandatory login bullshit, I bounced. Companies keep adding this “feature” as a way to control your stuff: Doom on Switch, Halo Master Chief edition, nvidia, my fucking mouse(!?); all need a login for no other reason than to add a point of failure/killswitch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Same here. When my Internet is out, my household needs to still be able to watch shows from my NAS locally without having to jump through hoops. Plex wouldn’t let me just do that anymore.

Moving to Emby has had its own small issues, but with the internet out the family can still just load the TV app and watch a show like normal. They don’t need to know how to do any troubleshooting, alternate login options, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
NAS Network-Attached Storage
PIA Private Internet Access brand of VPN
Plex Brand of media server package
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
TLS Transport Layer Security, supersedes SSL
VPN Virtual Private Network
VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)
nginx Popular HTTP server

8 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 12 acronyms.

[Thread #138 for this sub, first seen 15th Sep 2023, 05:35] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

permalink
report
reply
99 points

as always for profit orgs are proven to be abusive on their customers… so happy that I’m using Jellyfin

permalink
report
reply
62 points

lol “Selfhosted” my ass - that’s why FOSS is superior regardless of features.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This ^

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Exactly, open source is always worth the extra effort, if any, to get things working. Contribute!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Not really. I bought Plex for $100 13 years ago.

Do you know how much time that saved vs fucking around with xbmc trying to get plugin to work and the media scanner to be consistent?

It was worth every penny and saved me hundreds of hours fucking around with libraries to scan in anime because it doesn’t follow the proper s01e01 format.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

If i could get HW accelleration to work with Jellyfin, like it does in Plex, I would switch yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Works fine for me! (DS920+)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

The fact that this comment - offering nothing - got the upvotes, while the three comments trying troubleshoot are not tells me everything I need to know about this community

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What’s the problem? I gave it GPU access and it just worked. Given Jellyfin is a fork, it shouldn’t be too different

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Works better for me, I do av1 which I don’t remember plex even supporting

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Works fine for me via VAAPI on Linux using /dev/dri/renderD128. What OS are you using?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hmm appears that I got it working by trying again. It was something about adding group to my docker compose file that did the trick. Thank you for motivation. 4K HDR is working now!

Next issue, Swiftfin for Apple TV needs quite a bit of polish, for instance I can’t change the subtitles within the player. But perhaps I should pay for Infuse until I feel it’s there.

I’d be quite satisfactory to not support Plex anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Am not even surprised, Plex went to the gutter long ago when someone gave them the brilliant idea to start a media company on software used by pirates.

permalink
report
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 75K

    Comments