After a month of updating Floridians on hurricanes, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is now focusing his official office on fighting an abortion rights amendment, holding a campaign-like rally at state expense two weeks before the election.

DeSantis’ event Monday, which was capped with a prayer from the archbishop of Miami and the lieutenant governor asking people to not vote like atheists, came after the Department of Health’s top lawyer resigned over a letter he said the governor’s office forced him to send to television stations in an effort to stop a pro-Amendment 4 ad.

56 points

Joke’s on him. I already voted YES on #4. Because abortion is healthcare.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Nicely done — I voted today too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I look forward to pissing into the wind as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This HAS to be all kinds of illegal…

With the rampant voter suppression, the human trafficking, and now this, he would probably be looking at several decades of jail time if the law applied to rich and powerful Republicans.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Wasn’t the US Constitution’s 4th amendment the basis for Roe vs Wade? It would be fitting for the Florida 4th amendment to enshrine abortion access in their state.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

It’s not the 4th amendment to the Florida constitution. It’s in slot #4 on the ballot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

I will never understand how a doctor is against abortion rights.

A doctor is in a prime position to understand that many times symptoms of one patient can be disease /problem /ailment X and in the next patient it can be disease /problem /ailment y.

A doctor has the training to understand that many times what they are doing is just educated guess work. So how are they going to have a definitive line of when a pregnant lady is at risk during pregnancy and know exactly when an abortion is needed?

It’s like they actually failed in college at understanding how their job even works, but somehow passed because they got enough points in other areas.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

As someone managing some chronic illness who has interacted with many doctors and specialists in the last several years… it’s a mistake to put Drs on some kind of “smart person” pedestal. They’re just a profession like any other - some are amazing, some good, most are idiots without much knowledge outside their narrowly defined practice.

If you think of the way you progressed through your tertiary studies, you just do it one exam or assessment at a time. None are particularly “hard” or require amazing IQ or reasoning skills, it’s just time and effort.

The main difference between a pharmacist and a GP is that the former is done in 3 years while a GP takes 9. The extra 6 years doesn’t make them smarter or better thinkers, they just broaden the things that they know.

Another aspect is that most people can’t afford to spend a decade studying or doing placements etcetera.

So yeah, the opinion of a Dr is only helpful in their specific field. Your GP will be great at prescribing antibiotics, but doesn’t know anything about diet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m going to catch flak for this, but my opinion of general doctors is basically the welcome to Walmart greeters.

Doctor - what’s your complaint?

Patient - my heart hurts (or whatever hurts)

Doctor - down the hall to the left, take the elevator up to 4th. There’s a specialist that can see you there. Don’t go down, or you’ll be in urology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah that’s pretty much my view.

My point though, is that most people conflate “doctor” with “smart person”, but that’s a false association.

Doctors are just people who studied a lot longer, and that doesn’t make them smart, nor more credible in any meaningful way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can understand that a doctor might personally be against termination of a pregnancy when it isn’t medically necessary. I don’t agree, but I can understand being against it.

But even if you’re a doctor that feels that way, do you really want the state second guessing your decision if you performed an emergency abortion that was medically necessary?

Even a pro-life doctor should be 100% against the state getting involved in a patient’s medical decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe a doctor in theology?

\s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I want to believe that you are wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Same way the physician governor of Hawaii declared Joe Biden mentally fit. They lie for reasons that benefit themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

When will fools like this realize the fundanentals of american beliefs doesn’t favor one religion over another, even if you don’t practice at all? Using religion as a base is just so disengenuous to the people.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 509K

    Comments