Kamala Harris had a terse reply to Trump’s plan: “No.”

Donald Trump said Thursday that vaccine conspiracy theorist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would be in charge of “women’s health” if the former president is reelected to the White House.

The comments reflect Kennedy’s growing role in a potential administration and his rising standing in the Trump orbit after he dropped his independent bid for the presidency and endorsed his onetime competitor. But calls for a senior position have troubled health advocates, who point to Kennedy’s long history as a skeptic of widely accepted science surrounding vaccines. Those concerns grew this week after the co-chair of the team planning Trump’s potential transition said Kennedy had persuaded him in a 2.5-hour meeting that vaccines caused autisma widely debunked stance.

The Harris campaign was quick to share footage of Trump’s plans for Kennedy on Thursday, and Harris herself tweeted a short response to her opponent’s pledge: “No.”

77 points

MAGA just really does not give a crap about women’s health.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Or anyone, at all. They care about their own power, wealth, and status, nothing and no one else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Oh, they do. They care because they want women to suffer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It makes sense when you realize they take “women’s health” to mean literally one thing only: access to abortions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Being maga means just being a Karen. That’s all it really is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It is far more than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Try to stay with me here because I have this crazy idea. It’s out there. So far out there I’m pretty sure it’s never been done. How about we have a woman with medical training in charge of women’s health?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Be careful what you wish for, or they will find the one woman trained in medicine who wants to sterilize people using logic derived from eugenics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s one here in Houston who believes in all kinds of crazy shit. Look up Stella Immanuel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dr. Demon Semen! Yeah, she’s perfect for a Donald appointee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Great idea. Also, only gay people get to vote on gay rights.

Not joking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The training makes her an expert and you can’t trust those. Can’t trust a woman either, so that’s double untrustworthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh right. Vance’s debate argument that you can’t go with what economists say about the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Ngl it’s kind of a hilarious and baffling self-own with regards to the women’s vote. Like, genuinely, how is this in any way supposed to convince more women to vote for him? An antivax nut job with a literal worm in his brain…? Like… wut.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Vance is a bigger problem, he’s a billionaire sponsored corporate entity and he’s going to end up President.

Thiel replaced Epstein on the board of Carbyne, Mossad’s research and development company.

Vance is a dubious corporate character. Beware.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

This is exactly it. I keep waking up expecting to read that Trump died in his sleep, that’s how unhealthy he looks.

This is the Vance for President campaign, trump is just the fuel in the car that drives him there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I figure they need Trump to also do a bunch of crimes when he’s in office before they pull the plug on him… That way he can blamed whilst they keep all the power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I’m not sure RFK, Jr should be in charge of his own health.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

What do you mean? He’s a very healthy looking zombie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What makes you say that? The brain-worm, or his history of eating rotten flesh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments