29 points

A Chrome extension titled “Hide YouTube Shorts,” used by 100,000 people, was recently discovered to secretly collect users’ browser activity, raising serious concerns about user privacy on Google Chrome Web Store.

permalink
report
reply
93 points

“BuT mAnIfEsT v3 wIlL pRoTeCt UsErS fRoM mAlIcIoUs ExTeNsIoNs.”

permalink
report
reply
75 points

MV3 is clearly an adblocker sabotage op by Google, it shouldn’t even be disputed at this point. The sooner people understand this the better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Everything google does at this point is to squeeze pennies from their revenue streams. They have become destiny manifested for enshittification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Similar for Facebook, Microsoft etc. It will be interesting to see how long before they start to lose market dominance, or how anti trust laws work worldwide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

phew it’s not unhook

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I like how the recommended remediation to this malicious extension is to install an extension for monitoring extensions.

Serious question though: is “can connect to network” a permission on Chrome apps? What about Mozilla? It seems like this, more than anything, is what needs to be locked down for all apps (beyond just browser extensions). Like on my MacBook for example, I have to give apps explicit permission to access folders like Documents. But I’m pretty sure they can all access the Internet without restriction, right? That seems crazy to me.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Get Little Snitch.

Although yeah it’s wild that’s not built in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

You can just uBlock the thing on the front page.

If your browser recently tried killing uBlock - switch.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’ve been able to nix so many intrusive web elements with the ublock picker tool, often without leaving a trace due to modern web design practices. The YouTube shorts shelf is one such case, and it’s shocking how well it worked!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, uBlock mostly just adds CSS rules as display:none, and Google still pretends that’s some kind of security nightmare.

Because they’re an abusive monopoly that must be shattered.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Cybersecurity

!cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

Create post

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Community Rules

  • Idk, keep it semi-professional?
  • Nothing illegal. We’re all ethical here.
  • Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your “friends” socials you’re just going to get banned so don’t do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 3.1K

    Comments