44 points

Also fuck greedy investor urbanism. Valencia spent an enormous amount of time and money to redirect a river prone to flooding outside of the city. And then promptly urbanized the risky flood plain with housing and commerce.

permalink
report
reply
-33 points

Fuck investors in general. The DPRK had it right, as did Mao. Off with their heads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

They killed people they felt threatened by, and that they couldnt use. Teachers, doctors, authors, scientists, philosophers, social critics, journalists, midwives, artists, performers. Those are the people that died at the hands of Mao and Kim, not the capitalists whose wealth they both needed. Mao was all about investment into collectivist systems, one of the biggest factors driving The Great Leap Forward was the need to quickly develop new sources of domestic investment. And the DPRK is just a corrupt Juche system, they love foreign investors (and holding them for ransom!). Just because a few people you don’t like incidentally died in the purges too doesn’t mean they had “the right idea”, and it’s sickening to see you spout that revisionist BS here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Tankies gonna tankie

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah we desperately need another uprising, “investors” will not guilliotine themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Jesus fucking Christ. I get advocating for less car reliance but cheering the deaths of people just for owning cars is beyond fucked.

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

Valencia registers about 50 deaths by car accident per year, 1/3 of the deaths that the floods caused in the city. If you look at Spain as a whole, car deaths per year are much, much higher. Depending on how long it takes roads to unblock and cars to be replaced, this may in total be a win for human lives…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Who are cheering the death? The post had no mention of dead people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The comment was removed but it was there and it had a depressing number of up votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

This one?

Wow, 2 opvotes vs 52 downvotes. Soo depressing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

It absolutely does. Fucking look at it. You can’t take the dead people out of this photo, you can’t pretend they’re not there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I see no corpses in the photo. There is nothing to suggest those cars are occupied.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

But the people might not own the cars, they’re entirely separate

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t see any people in the pic other than the ones walking at the top of the frame.

Are there dead bodies there that I’m not seeing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Its black humor, not cheering the deaths of people. It’s pointing out that we’ve been warning the world for years that exactly this will happen, and now it has in a way that resembles a system correcting itself. There’s no joy in hilighting this, just ironic tragedy and the laughter of the gallows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

"I will shed no tears for any car owner killed in this disaster. They got what they deserved. For everyone else, I wish I knew where to donate toward any relief funds.” – SatouKazuma@lemmy.world

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

The comment is likely gone now but there was someone cheering in the comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And had they replied to that comment they would have had a point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

People can hate cars AND help humans in need, even car users.

Flooding wouldn’t be so bad without global car dependency.

I’m sorry for all the losses the people have to endure, but after this is over, there needs to be a discussion how to prevent disaster like these or minimise their impact on human and general environment.

permalink
report
reply

Flooding wouldn’t be so bad without global car dependency.

because of climate change or…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Reduced inpacts of climate change but more importantly better urban design. Long, straight, impermeable roads guide water wherever it wants to go with little resistance or slow downs. Cities can be built to be more permeable to handle water better, they can also implement stomwater retention and detention ponds.

Many cities currently waste lots of space on asphalt for cars. We could build transit with permeable surfaces (such as grassy tram lines or cycle lanes designed from permeable materials). We could build less parking lots and save that space for stormwater ponds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The financial, spatial and carbon economy of motorised private transport is inefficient, including its infrastructure. Opportunity costs of missing climate action due to economical reliance on private transport, spatial constraints of land use for traffic and inefficient housing (private transport induced sprawl) are just two examples for that.

Climate change fuels flooding frequency and severity, so fueling climate change with fossil fuelled private transport is irresponsible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What happened to basic human decency .

They are mourning 200 dead in a disaster zone.

Can’t you shut your fucking mouth for one week ?

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

I’ll shut up when we mourn the death and maiming caused by the use of cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well, that’s vile and also a clinically psychopathic lack of empathy.

I hope that when you grow up, you manage to reconnect with your humanity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I hope that when you grow up, you manage to reconnect with your humanity.

The same to you then.

You remind me of the people who complain about talk of gun regulations after mass shootings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The thing is, you’re both right. It’s a vile and cynical lack of empathy on both your parts. He’s exactly right, far more people die daily who get none of your empathy. If people dying on the road is supposed to change our behaviour, then what about you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Devastation shocks the brain full of thoughts and feelings, navigating around the rocks takes courage

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Name checks out

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’ve seen a lot of terrible things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

So basically, a submission that places fuck cars users at the level of this guy. Makes sense, fits all my expectations for them.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

The responses to this on the other post were the same, punitive and wrathful with no space left for critical thinking.

How many people shop online then consume media showing the impacts of climate change or reports of warehouse working conditions within the delivery window? How many “fuck cars” users also subscribe to gentle parenting content? How many were raised in Christian homes and currently hold negative views on religion generally?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 898

    Posts

  • 25K

    Comments