Currently downvotes are enabled on a trial basis, this was done by me to see if they can be enabled to prevent spam from rising to the top of communities, along with the fact that is another form of interaction/feedback.

However I’ve gotten some pushback for this and so I’d like to see the general consensus of this decision. Please put any comments/concerns in this thread, and please vote here: (Link gone poll is done)

the results of this poll and the comments will determine if we keep or remove downvotes again

75 points
*

Yes I like having downvotes. I use downvotes to notice trends of spam so I can better identify who to report/block.

That site sabotages the back button, fyi.

ALSO the downvote disabling feature never worked as intended. It only blocks lemmynsfw accounts from downvoting anything, lemmynsfw or otherwise. THIS account could already downvote anything federated.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

the downvote disabling feature never worked as intended. It only blocks lemmynsfw accounts from downvoting anything, lemmynsfw or otherwise. THIS account could already downvote anything federated

Sure but those of us on lemmynsfw can’t see them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ok. I generally like being able to see things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You could downvote from another account but it wouldn’t be federated and tallied for anything but your home instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Downvotes have some advantages over blocking. They:

  • Indicate trends of spam (as @morphballganon@mtgzone.com pointed out).
  • Allows minimizing exposure to unwanted content from a given account without blocking out exposure to all that account’s content. (Accounts may post a mix of content I do and don’t like. Blocking throws out the baby with the bathwater.)
  • Help disambiguate the popularity of content vs. reach of content. (Relatively few upvotes compared to other posts could be due to community obscurity, or posting at a poor time of day. It doesn’t indicate whether the community likes the post, or how you should adjust your posting habits to increase appeal. Counting downvotes helps you understand how many total people viewed a post, and the percentage of those who appreciated it.)
  • Are lower friction. (They take fewer clicks.)
permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

No downvotes. People use it as a “this isn’t my fetish” button and everything even slightly niche gets sent to oblivion. Especially bad for gonewild posts where people’s self image gets involved.

Also using a Google doc for this poll seems like a bad idea since people who aren’t from this instance can vote

permalink
report
reply
20 points

You are using “some people misuse a thing” as a rationale to get rid of the thing.

If someone posts fetish x on a vanilla community, they should get downvoted. If they post that same thing in a community about fetish x, then the community can simply be blocked by those so inclined.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

If they post that same thing in a community about fetish x, then the community can simply be blocked by those so inclined.

The problem is the majority of people don’t actually do that. They just downvote it to oblivion. That’s a significant part of why they were turned off in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Believing that fetishes should be separated in their own corners and downvoted otherwise is an excellent reason to not have downvotes - or to just not post content in this instance anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Separating things into their own corner is literally the point of subs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

by that same logic a use that sees content they don’t like on a community they do can block that user.

is there a problem with content being posted that doesn’t match communities right now? i haven’t noticed one. the biggest problem on this platform right now is lack of content. downvotes, or any tool for creating explicit negative social interaction or feedback can make a community more hostile and less inviting. right now i generally see almost no posts on any nsfw communities that should get downvotes that don’t just get taken care of by a moderator. right now we need to draw people in to posting content way way more than we need better tools to organize it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

the biggest problem on this platform right now is lack of content. downvotes, or any tool for creating explicit negative social interaction or feedback can make a community more hostile and less inviting.

Exactly this. We don’t have enough content to give users the tools to discourage posting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is the important part:

Especially bad for gonewild posts where people’s self image gets involved.

We don’t need a “go away, you’re ugly” button. That’s what blocking is for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Hm… what if downvoting was weighted only 1/10th as much as upvoting? So a few downvotes here and there from people doing it wrong wouldn’t amount to anything in others’ view, but if a post is heavily downvoted due to being in the wrong community or low effort, that’s visible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If they post that same thing in a community about fetish x, then the community can simply be blocked by those so inclined.

Yes, they could. But that’s not what’s going to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t like downvotes. I post stuff here, if it gets downvoted it can fail and go below the level of visibility that garners it more votes. People will downvote for any reason that comes into their heads. It’s almost like random noise but it messes with my post’s path to its intended audience.

I don’t see what possible motivation I would have to keep posting when that is happening.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

You aren’t entitled to exposure. Voting the good up and the less good down is the fundamental basis of sites like Lemmy and Reddit. As a content creator/poster it of course hurts when your stuff isnt enjoyed by the community, but its the decision of the users what gets big and what doesnt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, it’s you who aren’t entitled to content.

If I have to make an effort to do something it has to be rewarded. Else why do it?

You don’t wake up in the morning and whack yourself in the face with a teaspoon, do you? It wouldn’t happen because there would be no reward in it. Except for that one person in 100,000.

So without me, and people like me*, you ain’t up or downvoting anything because no on is posting.

*Unless you want to leave the posting to the bots…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Lol I’m sorry but you’re are entitled to nothing when posting. If people like it, great you get upvotes. No one is entitled to those votes though. If you were, then they’d be meaningless (or at least more meaningless haha)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We can’t afford to shit on the few posters we have.

Radovic is prolific - they post a tonne of content. If they are saying they don’t like the change, listen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Posters need viewers and vise versa. One cannot function without the other. So no I reject your appeal to authority fallacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I am also being shat upon in the past few days by anonymous blanket-downvoter(s) and it’s not a pleasant feeling. Rather discouraging, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I don’t see much reason to have them. Others have spoken of helping with spam. I haven’t noticed any spam on this instance.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

You haven’t seen the new posters that suddenly show up, drop the same 2 pics in about 40 different places, then never post again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Oh sure but I wouldn’t have considered that spam I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I see a handful that have upvotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply