South Korean intelligence officials have adopted a skeptical stance when it comes to reports from Ukraine. It’s gotten to the point where Korean intelligence officials are telling reporters to hold off on relaying reports about North Korean troops from Ukrainian officials until they receive third-party confirmation, because Ukraine makes “fake news” at the state level. This means we have to carefully consider the source of the information and the intentions behind it.

Archive link

22 points

Thought this was pretty funny lol

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Information is one of the biggest fronts of this war, you can be damn sure that both sides will release information that is favourable to them and not the enemy.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Does NK have free press?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

That would be irrelevant because it’s not SK’s “free press,” it’s their government agents issuing this warning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lol wut?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Na, not right now

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, they haven’t been allowed to develop that yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Friggin’ downvotes on a serious question? I hope it brought some relief, you gentle egos.

I thought the article mentioned North Korean press but apparently it’s about South Korean press.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Seoul is right in the headline.

And in the article (right at the top, repeatedly) it’s not SK press, it’s SK intelligence agents saying this. The headline wouldn’t say “Seoul” and then have it be a private entity; “Seoul” is a metonym for the SK government. People only conflate individual institutions with the government when it’s China and some Chinese business does something stupid but not illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hankyoreh

In line with the newspaper’s nationalism and aspirations for reunification, its reporting of inter-Korean and East Asian affairs is based on its editorial policy seeking reconciliation, stability and peaceful co-prosperity through dialogue rather than pressure on the government of North Korea.

This newspaper has a hard on for downplaying north Korean aggression. They want to all be friends.

I read OPs article twice, and i can’t find any mention of any south Korean intelligence agents specifically. Are these anonymous sources? Is the whole thing made up? Where’s the direct quotes? There’s a whole lot of hand waving and nothing really of substance in this article.

The authors position really starts to be apparent when you start looking at the rest of their reporting on the same website. You can also see how the author IS fully capable of providing quotes and sources, just I guess not on this latest article.

https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1163962.html

https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1162683.html

There’s just a few examples. This author makes every possible attempt to downplay North Korean aggression, blaming it on SK or the US every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

How come they don’t get downvoted like I do when I call out Ukrainian propaganda !?!?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Here if it helps, take my downvote! You’ve earned it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m doing my part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

.world

stop! parody can’t keep up!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because downvotes don’t exist in real life so Nazi supporting world users don’t have a way to show disapproval at pointing out their favourite Nazis are basically lying about the state of the entire war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 119K

    Comments