94 points

Gen Z grew up on social media. The same that spreads the propaganda, the fake information and the toxic masculinity bullshit.

They also grew up with an impossible social economic context where they barely have any hope. Trump’s making promises to make the country great again. What have they got to lose?

Why is anyone surprised?

permalink
report
reply
46 points

What have they got to lose?

Gay marriage, contraception, porn, legal divorce? Just off the top of my head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Their POV is that the earth is going to burn to a crisp before they’re out of paying back their college debt whether the tie is blue or red.

Play an online game and hang with some teenagers every now and again and just listen in. I hear some straight depressing shit. They have zero hope for anything.

Kamala might keep the lights on. Trump might accidentally trip over a good idea. Worth a shot if you’re fucked either way, right?

They were wrong, granted… but justified? Sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They have zero hope for anything.

And they’re right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

Porn isn’t going anywhere. LoL

Divorce either.

Gay marriage? It’s already dangerous to just come out, let alone get married.

And contraception? They’ren already losing that one too in many states thanks to local governments anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

“divorce either”

Just like abortion, right? You realize it hasn’t been that long that you had to prove one party was at fault in order to be allowed to divorce? You hate each other? Denied!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Porn isn’t going anywhere. LoL

Give Project 2025 a read. Wild things in there.

Gay marriage? It’s already dangerous to just come out, let alone get married.

Thanks to who?

And contraception? They’ren already losing that one too in many states thanks to local governments anyway.

Literally a direct cause of the last Trump administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

https://www.npr.org/2024/07/07/nx-s1-5026948/conservatives-in-red-states-turn-their-attention-to-ending-no-fault-divorce-laws

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rcna161562

There’s a massive difference between the social stigma attached to coming out, and the revocation of the legal rights associated with marriage.
It’s not even that long ago that people couldn’t visit their life partner in the hospital following an accident, because they weren’t married.

Limited access to certain types of contraception in certain areas is a very different beast than overturning the case that ruled that contraception isn’t criminally indecent.

If you don’t know how far civil rights have come even in the past 20 years, or how much further back than that they openly want to push things back, I don’t think you’re paying attention.
Abortion had just as much legal protection as porn or gay marriage, and it “wasn’t going anywhere” until it was suddenly gone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Man it’s like you’ve never even met any of the dumb crackheads that are cucking for these evangelicals

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Gay marriage?

The real solution here is to abolish marriage as a state sponsored privilege. It’s a religious ceremony that should have no place in government. It’s pretty gross how there’s so much pressure and so many benefits (eg. tax breaks) from participating in this ceremony. If people want to perform this ritual, it should be like a baptism without any state involvement. Nobody cares about gay baptism, but marriage is a hot button issue because it confers so much privilege. As a non-religious person, it’s super oppressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

They also grew up during the pandemic so they might actually be less educated than Boomers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

As a Gen-X I will never blame the later generations. Especially Gen Z and younger, if I was in their shoes I’d be livid. You bring me into this mess and then tell me it’s on me to fix it? F U

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

As a Gen-Xer, we got the benefit of the boomers taking almost all the air out of the room, and their parents thinking our generation was even worse than the boomers. The boomers mostly ignored us, called us slackers, etc…some time goes by and we are getting lumped in with the boomers and the “greatest generation” and getting blamed for all the problems, so that’s been fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Gen X had no future, it was all boomers until…oh, it’s still boomers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But it is nice sometimes to finally get remembered, even if it’s for blame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They also grew up in a time where the education budget was slashed over and over, even some states like Florida getting rid of history and sciences during trumps last presidency. No surprise there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well I guess their plan worked

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Beyond their wildest dreams. The bad guys have been getting win after win after win the past few decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

People are surprised that they grew up with tech and are more susceptible to the propaganda than previous generations. People are also surprised at how vile and uncaring young men have turned into, they want to “own the libs” no matter the cost. They like seeing the pain they cause

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

they want to “own the libs” no matter the cost. They like seeing the pain they cause

I have a hard time believing this.

When you actually talk to the kind of young, Gen Z men that regularly spout right-leaning propaganda, generally speaking, you don’t see people who enjoy suffering.

You see young men who are suffering themselves, but are given no outlet by society to express or fix it, and are heavily propagandized to by fascists who know that by creating arbitrary divides, (the most common one you’ll see with these young men being “men vs women,” think Andrew Tate type rhetoric) they can redirect the anger of these young men from systems to other individuals and groups that aren’t the actual cause of their problems.

When young men are the specific, designated target of right-wing propaganda, which explicitly tries to tell them that “men used to have it better,” and actively tries to make them believe that they’re not strong enough, not good looking enough, and not rich enough, then of course you’ll get young men that feel, in some ways justifiably, shunned.

To put it how Jason Stanley put it in his book, aptly named How Fascism Works, “Misogyny is what faces women when patriarchal expectations are left unfulfilled.”

Those expectations never need to have actually been reality, but just the very expectation that they should have those things can make them feel slighted.

But remember, while these young men are angry, sad, and scared, they still don’t enjoy causing pain. (I’m talking broadly of course, you’ll always be able to find some crazy dudes if you look enough) They just feel like they haven’t been given what they deserve.

Just like the rest of Gen Z.

The only thing that makes them different is the fact they believe the source of their suffering is a different group of people.

I’m not excusing any of their behavior or beliefs, far from it. But claiming that young men enjoy inflicting pain on others because they hold beliefs that make them feel slighted by society is just plain wrong in the vast majority of cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

You see young men who are suffering themselves, but are given no outlet by society to express or fix it, and are heavily propagandized to by fascists who know that by creating arbitrary divides …

Man I cannot take another four years of “won’t you think of the poor lowly Trump voters?” (this time Gen Z style). The original was cringeworthy and I doubt I’ll like the sequel any better.

People have bigger problems than Gen Z white males, as I’m sure they’re accustomed to telling others online and in real life when they complain between call of duty n-word tyraids and discourse chats about shit coins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think that’s what they meant. What they meant is that those who adhere to the virilist ideologies found online are the ones who do. Because apparently violence and aggressive behaviour is viril.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They grew up with tech without understanding it, which is a big difference from millennials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Millenials appear to have been peak liberal.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Watching TNG reruns nightly as an 8 year old really gave me some hope for humanity’s potential.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Same. Le sigh 😕

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just remember that according to the cannon timeline, the United States was rounding up people and putting them in “sanctuary districts” and in 2027 it’s the start of World War 3. Who knows, we may be right on track for that brighter future!

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

We were teenagers under dubya and the iraq war. Depending on how much the country swings into actual fascism this time, gen alpha might wind up standing for general anarchism

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think the ones that elected FDR 4 times have us beat

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hell I’d vote for him a fifth time, but he’s mysteriously not running.

Although I suppose he wasn’t running the first four times either…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Took me far longer than it should have to get this joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

First generation seen moving left as it ages and a reverse tendency might be happening with the Z men while the Z women are much more left leaning. It might also be part of why Z men seem so much farther right, the women of their generation are much farther left than women of previous generations so the division is much more clear. In truth the men might not be much further right than men of previous generations were when it comes to the policies they agree with, we just didn’t pay as much attention to it back then…

Just some stuff they were talking about on the radio a few weeks ago…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That’s generally the consensus, that young men are roughly as conservative as they were historically, but women are more left-wing (although maybe a bit less than expected, given recent election results).

Results from Reagan’s 1980 election win look fairly similar: https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-1980, excepting that women and men were voting in similar ways for each age group, and bigger margins to Reagan in the older groups.

EDIT: Nevermind this doesn’t actually show age by gender data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Idk what that means though. Are you saying men always felt women’s place was in the kitchen and now women are saying it isn’t so they’ve moved more liberal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If this is true, it might explain so much of why they were so angry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Sure…

“Liberal.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I have been saying for the past 6 - 8 years that Gen Z is the future, they are different, they are compassionate, etc. My opinion changed on that Tuesday in a bad way.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Turns out that growing up with a phone in their hand made a lot of them particularly susceptible to right-wing propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ten Z didn’t vote Trump in. They simply voted for Kamala less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which helped Trump win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree that this is the lesson, but it’s bolstered by decades of bad behavior by the previous generations who chose not to leave a livable world for their children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

They’ve been raised to believe their thoughts are valid and they should speak up, instead of shutting the fuck up and listening until they have enough experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sorry, but that was a “kids these days” moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Why hasn’t there been a push to counter the propaganda on social media with social media?

Use short form, humorous posts that integrate facts and ideas that give a different more positive take on others. I would guess there are great writers and actors that have a progressive-ish mindset that could put something like this together.

But honestly what is the reason this hasn’t been done? Or if it is being done why isn’t there more of a push to get it seen?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

That would require ongoing funding outside of election years. These are paid for by Mercers and Kochs or the Kremlin on the right, and i don’t think Gates or Cuban is too eager to fund left-wing propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There is Holywood money in the world of progressive actors that could put something together but I don’t know that world and how it works so I have no idea if it’s something that is actually feasible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You will be surprised to learn how little money the most famous actors in Hollywood actually have, that’s why they’re all trying to sell vagina candles and tequila.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The Hollywood elites are full of conservatives and libertarians. The elites are the suits who finance those movies like Steven Mnuchin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Algorithms ensure that the only content that ends up getting to your eyes is content that you already agree with for the most part. Or content that you hate so much that you have an incurable urge to respond to it with swearing and vitriol. (or at least that’s why I think TikTok keeps giving me Maple Maga bullshit)

In other words, you can put up whatever you want but thanks to modern social media, the only people who will ever see it are the people who already agree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

why I think TikTok keeps giving me Maple Maga bullshit

I mean… it shows the garbage to you, and you keep coming back… maybe it’s time to ditch tictack

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If you don’t control the platform, it might just be wasted efforts, although I guess they could try. But it might be that those pulling the strings can be sure that virtually no one is reached.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s a frustratingly true response… sigh

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The establishment wants to stay established, so they only use their established channels, not realizing how disconnected they became.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Why hasn’t there been a push to counter the propaganda on social media with social media?

Because the dems are also right-wing and have no credibility.

The actual left-wing is constantly pushing counter-narratives but without the massive funding of capital (eg. koch bros). No billionaire is going to fund a left-wing Prager U that talks about how billionaires are trash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Because a lie will circle the earth a dozen times before the truth gets a foot (or whatever tf the saying is).

It is so much easier, and takes so much less time and energy to make up disinformation, than to fight it. And people on the left tend to actually care about the truth, and we also want others to understand the truth (and to gain the means for them to independently arrive at the truth), and spouting disinformation goes directly against that.

It’s amazing what people are willing to do to win when you not only make it acceptable, but encourage complete disregard for ethics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Its never been up to a single generation anyway

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*

When the link snaps open the entire chain is broken.

It is up to every generation.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 462K

    Comments