79 points

Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

This is one of the rare occasions I’m siding with Google. The news outlets are claiming that they should be paid money for those result snippets. It’s not because I’m caring for Google so much but because that stance hurts small search engines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

EU: You have to pay to show our news.

Google: Ok. We won’t show your news.

EU: Pikachu face

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

That’s what basically happened in Germany like 10, 15 years ago when the first publisher had that idea. Its news stories would still show up in search results but only the headline, not that text snippet and no thumbnail image. These results were less attractive to users, so traffic from Google to those web sites crashed down by like 80, 90 percent.

In the end the publishers gave Google a free license to reproduce text snippets and thumbnails. The tightened copyright law provision wasn’t repealed. Small search engines without leverage still (AFAIK to this day) have to pay.

So Google pays nothing, publishers earn nothing, upstart search engines can’t afford the fees, and so Google leaves even more in power because of a law not even they wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

But, is this bad? Google makes a crap-ton of revenue compared to publishers who are now struggling with AI content competition. They need revenue to pay journalists.

Hard to define the good guys on this one.

Note: It’s also a misrepresentation. The EU asked Google to do this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not wanting to appear on Google is how we’re going to get EVEN more dailymail type shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Laws need to be different for monopolies and large player. Stop the rich from using the small as human shield for their grotesqie practice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unless I’ve misunderstood the law, it doesn’t hurt small engines, because small search engines don’t have to pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://lemmy.world/comment/13446861

It’s also worth noting that if Google has to pay, they may very well just not bother to show that information in search results which also hurts small search engines who rely on Google for part of their search Indexing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I mean, they’ve done this when places charge them money to index the news articles there.

It hardly seems reasonable to both mandate that they index a given piece of news media and that they pay a fee to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Europe asked Google to do this so they can monitor what kind of influence Google has.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My brother in Lemmy, this is what stopping Big Tech looks like.

Europe made laws that say that Google and others need to pay if they want to link to EU publishers. Well, maybe the price they are asking is not worth it.

You’re right about the firewall energy, but that’s simply how these laws work. The point of copyright, as well as age verification and other such laws, is to control who may access certain information.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is the opposite of what you think it is.

Google says it’s running the “time-limited” test because EU regulators and publishers “have asked for additional data about the effect of news content in Search.” The company says it will continue to show results from websites and news publishers located outside the EU, and it will resume showing results from EU news publishers once the test ends.

This is the EU testing what it would be like if they ditched Google, not Google testing what it would be like without the EU. The test also doesn’t impact the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which ironically makes me think banning Google outright in the EU over this would be the right call to make.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

A US news echo chamber at the whims of whatever they think will appease trump is going to be horrifying…

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

If they could at the same time make one without usa news that would be great

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Users are testing the impact of not using Google.

Spoiler: non-LLM enshittified search engines return reliable results and usually are not censored.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I’ve been testing this for years now and the transition has been seamless

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which do you recommend?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve been using DuckDuckGo a lot more recently and it’s been pretty good. I’ve tried a few others but not really found one I love yet

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

DuckDuckGo is still the main one but the Bing results annoy me (MSN news proxied articles from other news sites)

Up and comers that are promising:

Ecosia: https://www.ecosia.org/

Startpage: https://www.startpage.com/

Stumbled on this today, worth a look: https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes/

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The EU already doesn’t like what google and the like are doing, maybe this gives them proper ammo

permalink
report
reply
14 points

What a good timing, honestly. In recent news of Nov 11th, Ecosia and Qwant, two European search engines, join forces on an index to shrink reliance on Big Tech (TechCrunch news article):

Qwant, France’s privacy-focused search engine, and Ecosia, a Berlin-based not-for-profit search engine that uses ad revenue to fund tree planting and other climate-focused initiatives, are joining forces on a joint venture to develop their own European search index.

The pair hopes this move will help drive innovation in their respective search engines — including and especially around generative AI — as well as reducing dependence on search indexes provided by tech giants Microsoft (Bing) and Google. Both currently rely on Bing’s search APIs while Ecosia also uses Google’s search results.

Maybe it’s time for Europeans to support more European tech companies and leave USA-based tech companies behind, here is a good start: https://european-alternatives.eu/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

thats neat, wish them luck, ill be sure to switch to one of em

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s awesome!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Removing outside sources of information? There are a few countries that already do this, and they’re not great places to live.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 550K

    Comments