80 points
*

“Since our priority is to build consumer value first and foremost, there are no ads or monetization features currently on Threads,” a Meta spokesperson said in an emailed response.

The spokesperson then continued, “But only until early 2025. Then we’ll be throwing consumer value in the trash and lighting it on fire. It will be very exciting.”

permalink
report
reply
39 points

They’re not even hiding the enshittification strategy. They’re practically teaching you the principles up front.

“First we trap you, then we exploit you. Duh.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Is it enshittification if it’s shit from the start?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I guess you can always make it shittier?

I never understood the appeal of Threads anyway. Like, who leaves Xitter because it’s toxic garbage and goes to something owned by Meta, who practically invented this particular flavor of toxic garbage?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, this was the Facebook origin story, so anyone on Threads deserves it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Consumer value as in number of valuable consumers we can grift later

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You deserve a raise. Someone get this deadwalker a corner office!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Step 2 of the enshittification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

TIL Threads didn’t have ads

permalink
report
reply
50 points

permalink
report
reply
20 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Dear Pikachu, of course you are surprised. Learn how to expect and evade Team Rocket first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How could those two suspiciously familiar faces with light violet and wine colored hairs possibly be Jessie and James from Team Rocket???

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I’m more surprised to discover now that it launched without ads

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The goal was to attract Twitter refugees. No ads helps sell the “greener pastures” the users were looking for.

Once those users are comfortable, Threads can do whatever it wants. They know how much it took to get Twitter users to leave Twitter.

People acting like Meta launched Threads out of the kindness of Zuck’s heart are dumb as fuck. Threads has the same goal as Facebook: to make money selling your eyeballs to advertisers and your metadata to data brokers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yet, some people seem to be harsher towards BlueSky than Threads. It’s just pure hate being focused for so many migrating there instead of Fediverse (which I agree would be better, but these people are not joining a social media to have to learn new tech terms so they can create an account and having to decide which instance after understanding federalization if they even do).

These people are happy when people migrate to Threads though, because better Zuckerberg than Musk, right? For some people it is always about hate and they avoid/are unable to make constructive criticism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So did Facebook. It’s the old drug dealer gambit: first hit is on the house, after that, you gotta pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

There aren’t any ads on Mastodon. :)

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments