I like to ask anybody in a tirade against “wokeness” or “DEI” what their definitions of those words are and what they find objectionable about it.
If they can define it correctly (most can’t), they usually can’t put into words what they don’t like about it other than that the idea of other people being treated equitably and respectfully makes them feel threatened , vulnerable, or marginalized. Which is absurd, but expecting these people to think beyond themselves is asking too much.
Note, not against it.
I think a huge part of it comes from the usage of “wokeness” as a political tool and the fact that companies made it a marketing strategy. What I hear mostly by people opposed to inclusion is that it is in everything, even if it’s not relevant (in movies for example, there is a heavy emphasis on the fact that someone is gay even though it is supposed to be a John wick ish movie where no one should care about which hole except the bullet hole).
I think that it should be included in everything whenever it fits, que the “there is a time and place for everything” pokemon meme. I think we have that more and more these days too :)
I still find it insane how racism has become political now.
WhY iS eVeRyThInG pOlItIcAl NoW
The difference is it didn’t feel forced, you can only make people behave with law enforcement or having them see it your way when they reach that conclusion themselves.
This sadly reminds me of when an Official Star Wars Youtube channel did animations to introduce the main characters to a younger generation. There’s one of Leia where they re-enact her shooting the group’s way into the garbage area.
And literally there were dozens of Far Right Star Wars “Fan” channels screaming about it, claiming that no scene like that existed in the actual movie and that they were “re-writing history to make Leia look more important than she really is”
They really are just massive sexists who pretend Rey’s a Mary Sue and that Leia never did anything but wear the slave outfit.
