Summary
White supremacist Avi Rachlin used racist slurs during a Michigan Senate committee hearing, claiming proposed gun legislation unfairly targets white people while suggesting lawmakers focus on Black communities in Detroit.
Representing the extremist group “Groypers for America,” Rachlin falsely argued the bill was retaliation against white Trump supporters.
His comments, including the use of the N-word, were condemned by lawmakers, with Sen. Jim Runestad calling the remarks inappropriate.
The committee ultimately advanced the bill, which would expand the ban on firearms in Michigan’s Capitol, initially requested after armed protests in 2020.
This scum doesn’t deserve to exist anymore.
“It is racial because the people who carry in the Capitol are primarily white people“
Because the black ones are accosted and harassed if they’re armed? Something I heard a long time ago was that whites fear becoming a minority because they know how minorities are treated. I just find it odd that they use that as a reason to obsessively cling to power instead of trying to make everyone’s lives better.
Back in 2020, Democratic lawmakers requested a change to firearm regulations in the Capitol when armed demonstrators and militia members went into the building demanding an end to COVID-19.
Funny how gun laws and gun restrictions are okay when it comes to protecting lawmakers, but not okay when it comes to protecting schoolchildren.
Weird, because historically gun control happens when white people get scared a black man has the same rights as them.
Just ask Dredd Scott v Sanford , or Ronald Reagan.
White supremacist Avi Rachlin
Avi?
It’s just a name. Maybe a fake name… But zionism is a white supremacist ideology.
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/1/9/the-zionist-fallacy-of-jewish-supremacy
White person from MI here. I don’t want anyone to have easy access to guns, especially white people. And I don’t want them to be allowed where peaceful protests happen. Armed protestors are not protesting they are intimidating.
I do wonder if there is some value in like a “protestor defense volunteer”. Like a group that their job is just to protect the people in protesting areas, regardless of affiliation or reason. Can’t call it a problem if everyone gets defended while exercising their rights, and then protestors don’t have a reason to bring guns.
Edit: I guess that would normally just be the police?
Yeah, most of the time the protesting groups bring their own armed people. They don’t take part in the protests generally though. They stand to the side and watch (at least for leftists, I think the right they’re more directly part of it).
Ideally the police is what you’re asking for, but I wouldn’t put much faith in them.
