137 points

lost the ones more easily duped by soundbites of lies.

“I love the poorly educated!” -Trump, 2/2016

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It’s too bad she didn’t offer any soundbites of truth. Her entire campaign was built around being inoffensive to everyone which meant saying nothing that might evoke meaning. Lies thrive in that environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

She did, you just weren’t listening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I’m easily the most politically engaged person I know. If I wasn’t listening (though I was) then that’s a really bad sign. We need candidates that drive engagement.

Kamala had a lot going in terms of technocratic improvements that actually would provide some value for voters, but there was nothing transformative, and there was no interesting narrative.

The most interesting thing she did was campaign with Liz Cheney, so that’s what got the attention. She wanted to convince right leaning voters that she understood them, but instead communicated that she is just another neoliberal warmonger. It doesn’t matter that she might have threaded the needle perfectly in her rhetoric because she stepped into a narrative that said otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can’t win without getting the easily duped vote. Dems will always lose if they ignore that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Once again, they are only looking at the people who DID vote… Those people always vote, and clearly the proportion of blue “always voters” is dwindling compared to red “always voters”. Yes ignorant voters lean red, but it doesn’t matter. Stop pretending like there’s a huge swath of “swing” voters. There’s not. Trump got basically the same votes this time. This election came down to the 10 million Biden voters who stayed home for Kamala. That’s it. All the rest of this is nonsense bullshit propaganda to obscure the truth. Why didn’t they come out for Kamala??

permalink
report
reply
4 points

They only “came out” for Biden because of covid and because trump was in power during covid and people were angry about how he handled it and there were a lot of mail in ballots.

Without the covid effect I really doubt Biden woulda won in 2020

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Because she’s a genocidal cop prosecutor. Who could be less inspiring?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And the other guy is a genocidal sexual predator felon. Who could more inspiring?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To be fair, they didn’t show up for him either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Who knows who would have run for office if third parties had equal access to the electoral process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

More inspiring to Republicans? Probably no one. Do you know we’re talking about Democrats, workers and progressives?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The convicted felon who is friends with Putin, Epstein, and Diddy

That’s pretty uninspiring IMO

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They didn’t show up for him either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

Says a guy who wholehearted supports genocidal Islamist terrorists. October 7th massacre? Now that’s inspiring!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
  1. Because she’s a woman
  2. The DNC failed to remind people what happened under Trump (Which is how Trump got away with “Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?”
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
  1. Less vocal on support for trans rights than Biden in his campaign and first days of presidency despite literal millions being poured into anti trans ads.
  2. Yes, the whole genocide thing, like talking about it or not, Michigan for example certainly lost a huge blue voting block just by the more predominantly Arab districts alone. Michigan, red. And nobody was thinking trump was the better option there, they just did not feel the need to participate
  3. They only mentioned how grave a threat a fascist who has openly talked about subverting democracy, and then were more than cordial when it came to a loss. The DNC didnt fail to mention, its that its not worth shit because trump is still a free man and our laws should have upheld those principles. You can remind people how presumeably bad it was, but it doesnt mean anything if youre not offering a clear better alternative while our system of laws is literally failing us.

God forbid Biden were to have run again, it would’ve still been a landslide, and he aint a woman. Maybe old as shit, but there is still a lot more common issues people grew to not like so much about Biden, then Kamala said she wouldnt be any different from.

I dump this comment because I personally believe reductive narrative will hurt our ability to effectively work together, and probably the biggest part the dems failed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

the whole genocide thing

No informed voter thought Trump would be better for Palestine than Kamala. Remember, people say one thing publicly when their private reasons are actually less popular.

The conservative Muslims who claimed they loved Palestine voted for Republicans because they are conservative. They are using the Palestinian people as political pawns, just like Hamas. They share conservative values with Republicans based on cultural issues. They differ on the justification for it, but they are all supporters of hierarchy. Same with conservative Latinos.

It’s not popular to say “I like hierarchy and I want to be on top”. Many supporters of hierarchy claim they love “individual rights” when they really want privileges for themselves. That’s the reason why some people love the “Bill of Rights” but hate equality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

It’s not reductive to acknowledge that we have a sexism problem.

When mostly white and hispanic men voted for Biden but not Harris then it’s hard to pretend like that has to do with the economy or some other shit.

Biden and Harris have the exact same policies, white and hispanic men voted for Biden but stayed home for Harris, logically you have to accept it was about being a woman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Sorry buddy, you don’t get to hand waive away yet another failure. This is on the democratic party.

Time to make that change obama promised a reality. Can they rip their lips off their donors butthole? Doubtful

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

To add to that, in 2020 we had almost universal mail voting that had been rolled back in most swing states by 2024. In addition, there were a lot of scary stories floating around about Trump supporters at the polls. Lastly, voter suppression efforts do suppress votes (e.g. removing people from voter rolls, closing polling places in blue districts, making voting worse).

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Fun fact, the DNC started all of these things in 2016 when they did them all to Bernie and his supporters. The RNC simply learned from their playbook.

But I can agree, some of the people who didn’t vote may have been influenced by it being harder to vote this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m sorry, but the idea that 10 million people on the left chose not to vote for someone just because she’s a woman is ridiculous. People who think like that are Republicans and would never have voted blue no matter what.

I’m pretty sure the DNCs entire strategy was making sure people knew they were better than Trump. But okay, I’ll give you that one of their failings was not leaning into all the horrible things Trump did or allowed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The because she’s a woman is major league copium, and if you choose to believe this then you got serious issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Everybody who was voting age was old enough to remember the trauma of 2016-2020 without reminders. Yes the dems should leverage everything anyway, but even the non-politically-aware have it in working recent memory. We can take that out of the list of causes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They should remember without reminders, but do they? The number of people who only seem to remember cheap gas is appalling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

The missing 10 million Biden voters is a silly talking point, leads to entitled questions, and reaching infantile and politically impotent conclusions. Are you so dense that you don’t know how electoral college works?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lmao you win the most pretentious comment in the thread award

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I’m honored. There was stiff competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m sure we could break it down by state… But the missing voters is THE thing that swung this election. Figuring out the true reason those people sat this one out should be everyone’s top priority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Seven states mattered. Look at those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

I have spoken to two kinds of voters.

First off, was my dad. He never ever voted in his life. This was his first year of voting and he went Harris. Simply because he knew enough of what she was about and liked her character.

Meanwhile, the other party was my formerly adoptive mother. She voted Trump because “I just don’t like the other party”. That was her only reason. And that was just simply dishonest and uneducated.

So, it is possible that someone is capable of just even doing the tiniest research can give you an idea of who to vote for.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Wait, what do you mean by formerly adoptive mother?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mom, I’m disowning you. It’s not me, it’s you. Now pack your shit and think about what you’ve done.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The artist known as my formerly adoptive mother

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

No, SHE didn’t.

Corporate News Fucked Up Again.

For some reason all the headlines about this seem to be about what the DNC or the Harris campaign should have done.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I don’t think it’s fair to just dump all the blame on corporate media. The news media landscape hasn’t meaningfully changed since Trump was first elected, but despite having 8 years to formulate a sound media strategy the DNC is still campaigning like it’s 2015.

Like, sure, the Democrats are running with a handicap in the current media landscape, but that isn’t new, and it’s the responsibility of the DNC to figure out how to overcome that disadvantage — a task that the current leadership has proven itself woefully incompetent at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yeah but like, it’s a bit crazy that the right has: Fox News, OAN, NewsMax (or whatever it’s called), Joe Rogan Experience (gateway drug/sanewashing), Benny Shaps network, X, Truth Social, Prager U, Tim’s Pool, right wing radio, and lots of other smaller shops and they all seem to claim corporate media is the worst and they’re all here to tell you the truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What’s crazier is when WB bought CNN and literally said Faux News was the plan for what they wanted to do, and loads of journalists resigned from CNN over the changes…

People still think any media organization owned by billionaires has a chance to be “on the left”.

If a billionaire (or group of billionaires) own a media company, it’s only to manipulate people into blaming anyone except billionaires for the current state of affairs.

Like, it’s great you’re realizing it now…

But the merger was two years ago…

https://www.vox.com/2022/8/26/23322761/cnn-john-malone-david-zaslav-chris-licht-brian-stelter-fox-peter-kafka-column

None of this was done in the shadows, they came right out and said it. Publicly and repeatedly.

What you want to happen is happening. The Dems are getting their own versions of that shit.

The problem is they’re getting it for the same reason: to trick us into voting against our own interests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Don’t forget Sinclair Broadcasting. They’re the local branch of the right wing propaganda machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yes. Add to that that they have no ethics, and will say and do anything.

People on the left tend to actually adhere to their moral and ethical framework, which immediately puts us at a massive disadvantage against the dirty cheaters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

They could start by shedding any hope of capturing those voters. I can tell you with 100% certainty, based on trump being a convicted felon, there is no attack that will flip them. You have to reach outside current demos and bring your message to them. If they can’t learn this obvious fact thats been lingering for 8 years (shoot someone on mainstreet) they are useless as a political power.

Next is the message. Obviously it has to be about change. Where Harris again failed by clinging to bidens record. The DNC needed to drop current dogmas and level. They would have started by talking like a normal fucking human who doesnt have a scripted line and strategy for everything. Then they would lay out the facts. This is what ‘government can do’ and this is what ‘government can’t do’. This is what YOU the voters need to do to get governement to do what YOU want. Then address what they want! FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE. THEN LAY THEM WITH THE FUCKING PEOPLES ELBOW. “THE PEOPLE HAVE TO BLOW UP THE POLLS TO GET THE FREEDOM OF FINCIAL INDEPENDENCE, IF THERE ISNT COMPLETE HEDGEMONY IN ALL BRANCHES OF GOVERNEMNT THERE WILL NEVER BE MEANINGUFL CHANGE.”

Promise fincaial independence, promise people will never get it if they don’t show. Then we either got as far as the line, “I own a gun” or the people show up. Either way, you ran an honest, noble campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The news media landscape hasn’t meaningfully changed since Trump was first elected

I think that’s the heart of the issue. Yes, DNC should have figured out away around all corporate media outlets but that’s an enormous, unbelievable ask.

Yes, the DNC should be mobile, and memeable, and . . . fuck, I dunno - on 3.14chan or whatever, but at the end of the day they still have to rely on the fucking Today Show and NBC Nightly News and the motherfucking New York Times to carry their message without shitting on it - which they absolutely will. never. do.

The right has poured hundreds of billions into this since the mid-90s. The left has no fucking clue. Despite having all the academics and content creators telling them what to do. It’s time to put a fist in the face of corporate news. Sweet talking has gotten us a fascist dictator.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I mean… bernies doing it. Dude is like 80 and is absolutely idolised by the younger generation and regular middle and lower class people because he seems to actually practice what he preaches and is genuinely interested in what’s good for people. Most politicians to me just give the impression of seeking politics to enrich themselves and clasping onto power to avoid losing that even when their senile and completely incapable of fulfilling their role.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Democrats ran another perfect losing campaign. Some people might say that losing makes a campaign definitionally imperfect, but that’s only sane people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

She lost to a carnival barker. Other than that, the campaign was perfect! Great news for the Democrats because they have the perfect formulae. (/s in case you missed it.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

For some reason all the headlines about this seem to be about what the DNC or the Harris campaign should have done.

Wait…

You’re surprised people are blaming the candidate that lost and her campaign team that was paid millions of dollars and spent over a billion and still couldn’t beat trump?

Why?

What is the logic where the people whose literal job was to win the election, aren’t at fault for losing the election?

And I’m scared to even ask, but:

Since you think they’re blameless, does that mean you really want us to do the same shit in four years again and hope this time screaming at people will be effective?

Cuz buddy, it’s never been effective at anything besides letting some shitty republican into the Oval

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

This is what happens when you sell all of the major news outlets to billionaires - they publish pro billionaire propaganda

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m doing my part by getting more news than I probably should from Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Fucking up implies they didn’t get exactly what they wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s no way in hell either Kamala or Biden’s egos left any room for them to want to lose. They tried to win and to please their patrons at the same time and found out the hard way that it’s not always possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sure they wanted to win but losing doesnt change Kamala’s or bidens lives at all. They dont have to bear the burden of the trump nonsense like average people might.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is the real answer

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fair. “Fucked Us Up Again”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Poor soul thinks said corporate media somehow exists completely outside of the scope of the DNC as if the DNC itself isn’t just a convention for corporate donors to show up and throw in their demands in exchange for campaign funds and lobbying money.

I mean I’m sure the headline NYT article about Clinton having a 91% chance of winning was totally some next level corporate funded psyop and not a one of the many thousands of advertisements paid for by the DNC. /s

No, it’s totally the corporate media that’s after her and has absolutely nothing to do with the candidate that dropped the entire uncommitted movement worth of constituents for $100 mil in corporate AIPAC money. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Harris was running the campaign and funding the advertisements. Not the DNC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In presidential elections, it supervises the national convention and, both independently and in coordination with the presidential candidate, raises funds, commissions polls, and coordinates campaign strategy.

Again there is just no possible way the DNC is financially related to the very candidate it is promoting. Obviously, the Wikipedia editors are wrong /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Is the DNC in the room with us?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

WTF is with people on this site and the DNC?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Corporate news is not the guardrails of democracy. Ultimately, the people are responsible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Will we be nominating better voters next election, or should we try to nominate a better candidate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Who’s “we”? Democrats? Leftists? I voted against Biden in both primaries (because this outcome from a shitlib was inevitable) but there were not a lot of good alternatives in 2024.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

State level electoral reform replacing First-past-the-post voting so third parties can have equal access to run for public office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There will never be another fair and free presidential election in this country if Trump and his clownshow are allowed to take power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ok, what does that actually mean when you apply the sound bite to reality? What are your specific expectations for “the people” as individuals?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You want the democrats to be the one and only bulwark against the republican party? To bad. In a democracy, everyone deserves to be at the table.

It wasn’t right before the democrats repeated failures, and it sure as hell ain’t right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Can’t forget when I overheard someone say, “when was Biden is not running for president” as Trumps was announced he was president elect…

Democracy dies in ignorance

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 540K

    Comments