77 points

If you have millions of people on a social network, and you go looking for toxic shit there, you will find it.

Well, on Mastodon, you might not because by default it doesn’t have a useful text search feature. If you’re on a server running a modified version, or something else with decent text search, you might. My self-hosted server was on a relay that briefly pulled in content from a famously toxic server. At first, I didn’t see it because I didn’t follow those accounts, but later, I added an improved search feature and tried searching for some terms of abuse. I did find a few absolutely vile posts.

Bluesky has had a working search from early on. Turning off some of the default moderation filters and searching for terms of abuse does, in fact find people using terms of abuse.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

This person is a liar and just wants the Mastodon pat on the back. For some reason people on the fediverse can’t just enjoy their platforms and work to make them better. They have to lie about Bluesky and Nostr. I’ve been on Bluesky since the beginning. I’ve seen significantly more toxic people and content on fedi than I’ve ever have on Bluesky. People are happy to be away from X, they’re trying to promote a positive and supportive culture. There’s tonnes of minorities on Bluesky

permalink
report
reply
67 points
*

Two thoughts come to mind:

  1. If it’s there and you aren’t having it shoved down your throat, then that’s still a VAST improvement over Twitter, which has gone from shitty social media to blatant hate indoctrination platform.

and

  1. Did you just now discover that most people are shitty? I always assumed most people figured that out at 13 or 14.
permalink
report
reply
5 points

Did you just now discover that most people are shitty? I always assumed most people figured that out at 13 or 14.

Still haven’t, screw misanthropy

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Does the post strike anyone else as “off”?

Like why is this person giving a full elevator pitch of who they are before they drop the bomb of “bluesky is toxic”?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

You only need to look at the many BlueSky posts here to see that many people view BlueSky as an attack on federation. It’s only natural to see people on Mastodon shitting on BlueSky for taking what they see as their success away from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think he is saying nobody is sending him threats and calling him slurs because he isn’t a minority, but still acknowledges the problem of others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

because bluesky has had a collective struggle session recently with the twitter posters migrating over and realising they’re not actually being welcomed in open arms, usually when they out themselves with shit like genocide denial and transphobia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

Haven’t seen a single bit of toxic stuff yet, my feed is all cute art and photography.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

I read that at first as “cute art and pornography”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There’s definitely some of that in there too haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it’s related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

  • Posts must be on topic.
  • Be respectful of others.
  • Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
  • Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 63K

    Comments