8 points
2 points

thank you at the time I posted the link to invidious was not working and I didn’t think to check peertube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yw

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What about forks like Thorium ?.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Zero loyalties.

If Firefox did something similar, they’d be off my drive before I finished the article.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Chrome is a web browser created and maintained by an advertising company. This whole situation was never going to go any other way.

Firefox is equally doomed since so much of their current revenue comes from Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The DOJ is trying to make Google sell off Chrome (an antitrust case).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We have a foundation dedicated to the development of an entire kernel, but a web browser is a stretch.

(It indeed may be a stretch)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Who’s “we”, though? Here’s the list of Linux Foundation members: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/members It’s a foundation by, and for, commercial interests; not the users. If the same interests made up a foundation to develop a browser, it wouldn’t be different from Chrome; because in the realm where browsers are supposed to work, those ‘commercial interests’ would demand doing what Chrome does.

It’s a ‘happy accident’ that with respect to a unix-like OS kernel, the interests of the industry ended up being compatible with the interests of the user.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Stupid question, but do they prevent google from recreating their own browser? Chromium is mostly open source. They could just fork the project, rename it and support it much better than the open source community. This would place them again as the most used browser due to conveniences of ecosystem integration etc.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

No, part of the antitrust requirements would likely be them having to stay out of the browser market for a set number of years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I mean the title should be “… time to move to the other browser”.

Safari is the new IE with extra iCrap on top.

Random browsers usually use one of the 3 web engines, but without browser polish, or functionalities like a working adblock. Those that don’t are just someone’s toys.

So the only real option is Firefox, and the Mozilla foundation lost 80+% of their funding because they can’t get the Google money anymore. Maybe they’ll start actually funding FF instead of some BS humanitarian work that I can bet was primarily lining their pockets…

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Really looking forward to this new browser tbh.

As comfortable as I am on Firefox, I kinda just want something totally new to enter the space at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I wish Apple would open source Safari, or at least make some “Safarium” others can build on. Would be an instant third player without all the growing pains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I said they’re the new IE for a reason.

The w3c standard: ok so we all agreed that this feature will be placed in the body tag

Blink: ofc, that’s what I’ve been telling you

Gecko: sure, idc

WebKit: yeah nah, put it in the html

So many little senseless gotchas like that that exist for no reason that to be iSpecial

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The core of Safari (WebKit) is open source. If it weren’t they’d be violating the GPL license of KHTML.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah, admittedly I don’t know much. Could another browser build on it like Chromium or Firefox?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.6K

    Posts

  • 179K

    Comments