President Joe Biden will announce the creation of the first-ever federal office of gun violence prevention on Friday, fulfilling a key demand of gun safety activists as legislation remains stalled in Congress, according to two people with direct knowledge of the White House’s plans.

Stefanie Feldman, a longtime Biden aide who previously worked on the Domestic Policy Council, will play a leading role, the people said.

Greg Jackson, executive director of the Community Justice Action Fund, and Rob Wilcox, the senior director for federal government affairs at Everytown for Gun Safety, are expected to hold key roles in the office alongside Feldman, who has worked on gun policy for more than a decade and still oversees the policy portfolio at the White House. The creation of the office was first reported by The Washington Post.

-6 points

about time

permalink
report
reply
46 points

What are they going to do that the ATF and FBI don’t already do?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Maybe not encourage guns to be sold to cartels, unlike the ATF Fast and Furious program. It was supposed to track firearms going south, but just lost them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Operation Wide Receiver under GWB did the same thing and had the exact same issues. The thought behind the programs is not bad. Implementation was fucking terrible though.

I do love how Republicans flipped shit about Fast and Furious but none of them had any qualms with GWB’s operation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Shoot your cat and goldfish instead of just your spouse and your dog

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re thinking of the police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, that’s what this is in addition to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

Prevention of gun violence isn’t exactly the remit of either of those agencies. The ATF focuses on the tracking of and illegal sales of guns while the FBI focuses on crimes committed with them (and other crimes, of course). Neither of those are about prevention of gun violence.

A separate agency that can focus more on the social issues that are behind gun violence could act in many ways that neither of the other two agencies could while not having to worry about drawing focus or manpower, from how those two agencies operate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

They could provide free firearm training courses and encourage young people to take them. Which would help with accidents.

A separate agency that can focus more on the social issues that are behind gun violence

I doubt they are going to give this agency the necessary tools to lower poverty and the wealth gap, lower the rate of single parents, increase healthcare affordability, increase housing production, and destroy the culture of degrading those who try to better themselves. These are the issues that cause people to be unhappy enough with life they chose to murder. Happy individuals with productive lives don’t generally decide murder is the correct course of action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points
*

It hardly seems sensible for a government agency designed to prevent gun violence to then go and train people to use them.

All gun use is inherently violent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

People said the same thing about DHS when it was spawned forth into being. Maybe not a great comparison, but I feel like this one has a little more purpose to it other than job creation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Now you’re just scaring me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Actually collect data on police shootings?

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

Oh, man. Can you imagine the misery of being appointed to this post? Literally half of the government would hate and despise you and would look for ways to undercut you just to have an extra talking point while they stand in the hall talking to Fox News. And to top it off, what could you actually do to affect change? I sympathize with the poor workers of this office.

permalink
report
reply
103 points

So…department of education?

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points
*

Or the EPA, or the CDC, or the IRS, or…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’d be surprised by how much oil companies hate the DOT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What next, the FAA and FCC?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Half?

How few people do you think work for the government?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

It’s just a job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I don’t think you understand.

People saying Nazis were just doing they’re job are doing that to alleviate them of any responsibility of their work.

I’m saying it’s just a job to highlight how these people probably don’t care about what they’re doing so long as they’re getting paid. As in, who cares if a bunch of strangers hate you so long as you’re getting paid. That’s actually par for the course for a lot of work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wanting to prevent civilian gun violence makes you a Nazi?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Also knowing that you’re guaranteed to be “downsized” on the first day of the next party change in the White House.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And imagine how much security you’ll have to hire to keep yourself from getting shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“After months of research, we have written a 1000 page report proving the solution is fewer guns.”

Republicans: “MORE GUNS! ARM EVERYONE!”

permalink
report
reply
4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Why does America have some of the highest rates of gun violence in any of the developed countries, Blamemeta?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I don’t know SMCF, why specifically ‘gun’? Is the tool more important than the act?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
-9 points
*

If the Dems would drop their anti-gun fight, they would win every election in a landslide and we wouldn’t have the ridiculous government we have now.

EDIT: Lemmy and guns in a nutshell right here.

https://imgur.com/a/pR7CuLA

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

If Americans would stop fetishizing guns to the point of sacrificing children to the altar of their bang-bang toys, we could actually have a respectable society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Nah. I’ve thought about this.

If they couldn’t use guns, they’d use cars. If they can’t use cars, they’d focus on torture. i.e. instead of trying to kill as many people as possible, just try to make whoever you catch suffer as much as possible before pulling the plug.

These are all band-aids to avoid addressing the real problem: those who feel they have nothing to live for so they take their anger out on society.

The solution to the problem is reducing the disparity in wealth. It won’t eliminate all of them, but it will severely reduce them. This is why nobody is talking about it. The ruling class has been successful, again, in getting us to squabble over bullshit to avoid addressing the real issue, which is always the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

CDC counts gun and vehicular deaths at about the same, year in and out. Thing is, I can avoid suicide (43% or so), bad people and places. I cannot avoid random people killing me on a stroll or a drive.

Where’s your passion for dealing with death on the road? Because guns don’t scare me a bit. Driving does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“It’s worth the dead children to get elected” isn’t the best of campaign slogans

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Pedophiles don’t care about the law either it seems, so would you say we should just get rid of all laws pertaining to that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Its already illegal to murder, so adding additional crimes to gun possetion is essentially a proxy for making murder double illegal. If a criminal doesn’t care about murder laws, possession laws aren’t going to bother them.

Your metaphor would be more like saying: pedophilia is already illegal, make giving candy to children who aren’t yours with intent to abduct illegal too. Essentially make pedophilia double illegal (in this instance).

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Its already illegal to murder

Why? Murderers don’t care about the law

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

heres the thing though - criminals arent known for caring about laws or federal offices

Here’s the thing though - putting basic steps in place to make it more difficult for criminals to get a gun isn;t a bad idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s why we already have federal background checks required for all retail purchases of guns. Requiring those for private sales is basically impossible to enforce since anyone can sell anything they want in private as long as they don’t create a record of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

That’s just blatantly false. Actual scientific study on gun violence has found that gun restrictions, such as the assault weapons ban, had meaningful reductions in gun crime in the years following its implementation.

Most guns used in crimes are obtained legally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Exactly. Didn’t that one kid in that one shooting walk into the shop and ask for tons of ammo and nobody asked questions before cashing him out? I forget which shooting that was, but I could almost bet that applies to more than one school shooter at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Please show me examples of criminals following the law… I’ll wait

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 519K

    Comments