72 points

My first impression was the lead developer calling a PR for gender neutral pronouns in the documentation “personal politics”. Pardon me if I’m still underwhelmed, no matter the state of the project.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Ohhh,
The name of this browser, and this commit, that’s definitely a no go concerning me.

There is enough as**oles like this,

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

With you in that the sexist comment means avoid, but am I missing something about the browser name? Aren’t ladybirds just what ladybugs are called in the UK?

https://www.natgeokids.com/uk/discover/animals/insects/ladybird-facts/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Honestly the name was enough for me but seeing the commit discussion certainly makes me feel justified for judging a book by its cover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s disappointing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Guess they have more important matter to attend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Some made a pull request with all the changes made already. The issue that the PR addressed was the excessive use of he/him in the docs when referring to developers (aka the person reading the docs). Contributors expressed that they didnt think using male only pronouns in the docs made much sense when referring to any developer reading the docs. This wasn’t some entitled person trying to force the ladybird dev to rewrite the docs, all they needed to do was merge the changes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think a bit more context could help here. What if those devs are male and prefer he/him? Should those pronouns be changed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

based

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

bAsEd 🤡

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

“first alpha release is expected ~16 months from now”

“First Impression: I was not impressed”

You don’t say

permalink
report
reply
14 points

This feels like a filler post. What can we usefully learn about a browser that’s over a year away from an alpha release?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The article sucks, but not because it’s about early stage software. I’d love to get a deep dive on its architecture and how it would differ from the other browsers

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

I tried two months ago when people were talking about it, and I learned the reason why they said it’s going to take years for the first release. Honestly I am pessimistic about the browser situation these days, but best of luck

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Might come along just in time for when Mozilla pulls the plug of Firefox and ends up just using a rebrand of Chrome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think trying to do a “modern web browser” which is almost like a whole OS, is the wrong path to take. To retake the internet, we need to return to the basics. A simple web browser that does, at best, HTML and CSS. Heck, maybe even Gopher / Gemini support. No javascript, no worry about code execution, no “dynamics”. Much easier to develop and maintain, and promotes a leaner and safer internet.

Now, be it a hobby project or some sort of, by miraculous intervention, cleaned-up Mozilla, that I leave to the peoples.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you’re a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we’re excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let’s dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 667

    Posts

  • 4.9K

    Comments

Community moderators