A Black Texas high school student who was suspended because his loc hairstyle violated the district’s dress code was suspended again upon his return to school Monday, an attorney for the family told CNN.

Darryl George has been suspended for more than two weeks because his loc hairstyle violates the Barbers Hill Independent School District dress and grooming code, according to his family.

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

251 points

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes” CNN previously reported.

Is this school stuck in 1959?

permalink
report
reply
84 points
*

What do you want to bet that the code for “female students” is at least three times as long and contains the words “leg skin”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

More like 1859

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
14 points

Pure poppycock!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Ruby Bridges is still alive. MLK Jr would be 70 94 if he weren’t assassinated. This isn’t something that’s a relic of the ancient past. It’s something we’re barely starting to address in the current day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Small correction - MLK Jr would be 94 today. He was born in 1929.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You’re right, of course, but I was referring to the times when such attitudes were considered somewhat acceptable in some places, not the unfortunate fact that they’ve endured.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Jesus would get suspended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

I mean… he kind of did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Nailed it

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah, Texas isn’t kind to those of us with unique hairstyles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It is Texas so yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

What is this? The tiny town from Footloose?

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s a small town in Chambers County, Texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They want that All American Good Ol’ Boy Johnny Unitas, not that scandalous hippie ne’er-do-well Joe Namath

permalink
report
parent
reply
200 points

… Darryl was suspended the same week the state’s CROWN Act, a law prohibiting discrimination based on one’s hair texture or protective hairstyle such as locs and braids, went into effect.

This is what systemic racism looks like in real life.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I’m surprised Texas would even pass such a law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d expect Texas to pass the opposite, tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d expect Texas to pass such law but twist it somehow and oppress minorities using some loophole in that law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
163 points

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

Why do male and female students have different dress codes? WTF does the school system care if boys have longer hair? Apart from safety issues like being in a workshop class, why does anyone in the school system think they have the right to control who can and can’t have certain hair lengths?

Yo, is anyone else getting really sick of this overreach of power and authority? I’m not referring to the economic and political relations. Those aside, I’m talking about this crap where people are starting to get involved in personal matters of appearance, medicine, gender, and even straight bs crap like a high school band finishing a song. This is getting way out of hand. Our culture is rotting with power and control issues at the expense of individual liberties.

permalink
report
reply
87 points
*

I’m talking about this crap where people are starting to get involved in personal matters of appearance

I’m sorry to inform you, it used to be worse. Women rape victims used to not come forward because one of the main things that would be shoved in their faces was “how they dressed” and “were they asking for it.”

That bullshit has been a throughline in US culture for fucking decades. I’m in my forties and when I was in high school, girls had ridiculous dress codes that were clearly sexist and clearly icky as fuck. Why would male authority figures be so obsessed with young women not being “too revealing” unless they’re the creepy fucks who are staring?

Not to mention all the rules about men’s pants sagging in the 90’s. A rule that seemed aimed at young black and latino men in particular.

Believe it or not, it’s better than it was in the 90’s. It’s still bad, it’s still bullshit, but it’s not new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I’m sorry to inform you, it used to be worse. Women rape victims used to not come forward because one of the main things that would be shoved in their faces was “how they dressed” and “were they asking for it.”

It still happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And that’s why it’s the job of people like you and me to raise a hellish stink about it whenever it happens so that one day, maybe it will finally stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The dress codes even in the district my kid is in (and we’re definitely bright blue territory) is still sexist af. It’s absolutely insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Racial targeting aside, I think there’s a big difference between visible underwear and a hairstyle. It’s not the same conversation

permalink
report
parent
reply

yes it is. Both categories are arbitrary, enforced selectively and originate on discrimination

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Why do male and female students have different dress codes?

Sexism.

And yes I’m fucking up to here with this authoritarian bullshit not to mention the bigotry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s completely illegal per Bostock too. If it’s sex discrimination to fire a man for having a husband but not for a woman for having a husband, it’s sure as hell discrimination to tell a man that he can’t wear his hair a way a woman can.

I think this has been established for school sports even – if the school doesn’t offer a gender equivalent team, someone of the opposite gender must be allowed to apply for the only team. It basically makes teams unisex unless there’s distinct teams.

This school district must be the absolute dregs of Texas for even the legislature and Abbott to say “okay you guys need to stop doing this”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The only thing that’s really distinct from Bostock is the fact that this person is a minor. I can imagine an outcome where they conclude it’s not illegal because only adults possess the right not to be discriminated against.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Constitutional protections such as the first amendment apply to minors as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
149 points
*

This particular School District has pulled this stunt so many times that the State of Texas passed a damn law, called the CROWN Act, to make them stop! They’re back it claiming that the CROWN Act doesn’t regulate length or color.

The CROWN Act sailed through the Texas Legislature with strong bi-partisan support and Gov Abbott even held a formal signing ceremony for it. How god damned racist do you have to be that even those people think you’ve gone too far?

permalink
report
reply
28 points

When the Texas legislature and Abbott both think you’ve gone too far right, you’ve catastrophically fucked up on an inhumane level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At what point do they start firing the people in charge of the school district?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If it’s anything like my state, the board members make that decision and they are elected by the community. So that point is probably far, far away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Only if they’ve got blue tinges to their politics, otherwise, nah, yer good. Do what you like.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m amazed at the lengths some people will go to for such trivial things. I’m not surprised at all that a school had an old rule, or that they’ve been called out on it. But to try to bypass laws to enforce such a, let’s be real, silly rule of no real consequence, is just amazing.

I just can’t put myself in the head of some principal wo believes dress codes are the most important thing in the world. Just fucking back down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The principal doesn’t give a shit about the dress code beyond how it can provide a way to hurt black students. In that context it becomes obvious that they’re going to extreme lengths because they consider inflicting harm to be important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

At this point I think that they’re doing this knowing it’ll result in a lawsuit.

I wonder if they’re just fanning the flames to make it look like the government is le 1984 for not letting them have racist policy in their schools.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Well it is considered poor form to just put ‘NO BLACKS’ in the prospectus.

They had to get creative.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 511K

    Comments