-68 points

Why all these stale claims of sexual assault? Did she press charges at any point in the last 3 years? Why is it in a book and not a court filing?

permalink
report
reply
-29 points

Because it’s Me2

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

With the Danny Masterson trial still fresh, I can’t believe men still use this excuse. The women who accused Danny did come forward, and authorities did nothing. Many times for victims, nothing happens unless you make a public stink about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-50 points

My apologies for expecting some kind of rule of law and oversight when it comes to serious allegations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Come on, man, it’s Rudy. When he’s not drinking, he’s preparing to rape young girls on screen in a Borat movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And who do you think is to blame for this lack of accountability? Who do you think are the people that foster (or often even codify) this type of atmosphere?

If you actually gave a shit, you’d answer that question honestly, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

And now add Trump and MAGA craziness into the mix. Suppose someone who was a hero to the MAGA folks sexually assaulted you. Not only would you have the normal issues with the authorities, but you’d have MAGA crazies threatening you for “besmirching their hero’s reputation.” You could face death threats and have people track you down all because you dared to demand justice for being sexually assaulted.

Under all that pressure, I can’t blame women for staying silent. I wish that this wasn’t the case and that they could bring these allegations up without fear of reprisal. Sadly, though, that wasn’t the environment they faced.

Edit just to say: This makes me respect E Jean Carroll even more. I can’t imagine the amount of threats she’s gotten for daring to hold Trump accountable. It would have been extremely easy to just keep quiet to try to avoid the threats. Instead, she’s gone after Trump - multiple times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sadly you’re fucked either way. If you don’t tell anyone but the police, it’ll just be swept under the rug. Or they’ll interview the rapist and tell you it’s his word against yours and encourage you to drop it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nearly a third of sexual assault victims never share their assault with anyone.

And you’re surprised someone didn’t press charges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hate how often I see that shit as a “gotcha.” They set society up in a way that makes it an absolute nightmare to go through the process of even just reporting the assault. Good luck getting a conviction, unless you have a fucking video (and even then, toss-up). And then regardless of which way the trial ends up going, people never look at you or treat you the same ever again. It’s really no fucking wonder…

And conservatives use this shit as a “well, it must not have happened because she never reported it.” Yeah no shit. You know why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
150 points

I mean you are with a crowd that thinks “grabs them by the pussy” is A okay.

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

Interesting choice, using the image of kurtwood Smith, a guy who just got called out for sending a letter of support on behalf of a convicted rapist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Not condoning rape here but given that the courts have done their job and the rapist is seeing justice, can we leave it at that?

The need to cancel by further and and further levels of abstraction is toxic to society. Justice (such as it is) is served. We should move on. If you feel a call to activism then seek out help and care for survivors. Seeking to further punish is going to rot you up inside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What a horrible take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He point of giving letters to the court of character is to try to reduce the sentence. If people are able to give statements with no cost, irrespective of truth or repurcuasions, then they become pointless as all would be glowing and positive. Anyone giving such a letter should be able to stand by it. If they can’t they shouldn’t give one.

I haven’t read his letter, but I assume it talks about his time with him filming when he was younger. It doesn’t seem relevant of it’s about his character, aside from rapes. So, what’s the point of providing it? If it is relevant, then we should question the relevance and motive and veracity of the whole purpose is to reduce the sentence of a convicted rapist.

People will all move on. However, moving on does not mean ignore and forget.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

While I get your point, it didn’t read as supportive to me. To me it read as a statement of “this is what I observed” not “this is my judgement of the kind of person he is.”

Like if someone asked me what kind of person a coworker was. If my answer was “I saw them do their job” it can be a factual statement of my experience and really, isn’t necessarily helpful. It just means I didn’t witness them doing anything bad.

Edit - rereading as someone just posted a copy of the letter. While I can see some focus on positive interactions with his daughter, it still strikes me as a factual “this is what I observed” and far less the emotional supportive standpoint that bled through from some of the other letters that were submitted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Then insulting part in the Ashton letter was his defense of Danny as an anti drug warrior, after Danny was convicted of drugging and raping people. Also his saying that Danny poses no threat to society. I believe those were the main complaints about it by one of the victims

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Kurtwood Smith’s letter to the judge:

Dear Judge Olmedo:

My name is Kurtwood Smith. I have been a professional actor for 57 years, the last 43 years working primarily in film and television. It is as an actor that I came to know Danny Masterson.

I should mention that I am aware that Danny has been convicted of two counts of forcible rape and is awaiting sentencing.

I have known Danny since the spring of 1998, when we began filming the television show That 70s Show. We worked on the show for eight years and I consider Danny to be a good friend. Our friendship revolved around work. Primarily because of our age difference we didn’t socialize much outside of work but I saw hi every day on the job whether we had scenes together or not.

I believe Danny to be a wonderful actor. When working together I always found him to be prepared, inventive, and responsive to suggestions from the director, myself, and other actors. Danny was also very enjoyable to be around. He has a quick wit and a good sense of humor. I always looked forward to working on scenes with Danny. I should mention that he was extremely popular with the crew. He was usually the first actor to learn every crew member’s name, what their job was, and how it related to his job. Danny was the leader among his contemporaries in the cast. He was a tad older and much more experienced and he took that position seriously.

During the eight years we did the show. we never had the problems some other shows had with their younger cast members. After the show ended in 2006 I didn’t see much of Danny, except for occasional events, until almost 10 years later, when I began playing a recurring character on The Ranch. Danny was one of the stars of the show. I was happy to be working with him again. It was also great to see his family. If you know Danny, you know his family.

I have known his parents and younger brothers and sister since we started work on That 70s Show. They are a very close knit family; they seem to care very much for each other and work to help one another succeed.

Danny was now married and the father of a beautiful little girl. It was a treat to spend some time with him at work and to be around him and his family. I had met his wife while we were still shooting That 70s Show, although they were not married at the time.

I found that Danny treated all women on the show with respect, not only the women in the cast, but women on the crew as well. It was my observation that he treated the woman he married in a respectful and loving way. Later, when we were working on The Ranch. I was aware that, not only were they a happy couple, but he was a wonderful father to his daughter.

I had the opportunity to watch Danny with his daughter. At the time she was maybe two or three years old. It was so clear how much he loved her and how delighted he was with her. He was so patient and easygoing with her. At one point, when she became fussy, he joked with her and made faces and she calmed down and was laughing. She clearly loved her daddy.

I consider Danny a talented, hardworking, giving actor. I have viewed him being respectful and considerate to those he has worked with. He has been a leader and positive force among his peers. He has seemed loving and caring, not only towards his wife and daughter, but his family at large.

For all the reasons I have mentioned I consider myself fortunate to have had Danny Masterson in my life.

Sincerely yours,

Kurtwood Smith

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I do have to wonder if the scientologists made any threats to these people to persuade them to make statements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I can totally believe the crazy conflict this must cause for someone. Read this letter, imagine someone you feel this way about was convicted of two rapes and accused of three. It would do your head in.

Piling on Mastersons friends and colleagues isn’t going to help the victims.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
128 points

Oh, no! Really? The guy who was caught on camera trying to fuck Borat’s daughter groped you!?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Wat.gif

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It’s in the newest Borat movie. It’s real and it def happened

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Holy shit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

It’s always the ones you most suspect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Insurrection always gets him a little frisky.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 453K

    Comments