Summary

Donald Trump has exempted himself from key ethics guidelines required under the Presidential Transition Act, which he signed into law in 2020.

By rejecting federal funding for his transition team, Trump avoids donor limits and disclosure requirements, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

This move marks a break from precedent and has sparked alarm over potential personal enrichment during his presidency.

300 points

lol. Watchdogs. Hilarious. Let me know when we have a government again.

permalink
report
reply
84 points

Don’t hold your breath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

donvict part 1 will take a generation, at least.

donvict part 2 will take a lot longer and require practically-impossible coordination and commitment to get non-republicants to the levels of representation needed for amendment ratifications and impeachments.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The “United” States of America is over.

We’re gonna end up with the “Blue States of America” and the “Republic of Jesusland”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

Liberals never actually fix what conservatives screw up. We never closed Gitmo and we still have troops based in Iraq. We never actually ended the War on Drugs (which has left Republicans a loophole to ban contraceptives by listing them as controlled substances). We never truly repealed Jim Crow and much of the country still relies on forced labor even in liberal bastions like California or New York.

Trump’s just pulling back the curtain on how much has rotted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“Hey! You’re not supposed to do that!”

“Is there a specific law being broken?”

“Well…no, not exactly. But it breaks with tradition!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It does seem a bit silly to focus on this, but you know how the news is. Let’s not forget about Obama in that tan suit sending republicans off the deep end.

From a republican, about a tan suit:

“There’s no way, I don’t think, any of us can excuse what the president did yesterday. I mean, you have the world watching”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Even if there was a law being broken, time has shown that Trump is pretty much above the law at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Dont enforce democratic norms with tradition” should be in the historical rulebook. Right next to not printing money to pay bills, not invading Russia in winter, and not touching Americas boats

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’re gonna be barking a whole lot more the next four years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wonder if falling out of windows will be a common thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe someone should pair the watchdogs with guard dogs to do the biting when the former bark

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If we allow the government to have control of either group, the guard dogs will just kill the watch dogs.

Maybe the people should start biting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That is a very good point. The people should be controlling the government, after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Those poor dogs. Someone should call the SPCA and repo… Defunded you say?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe a network of volunteers can foster care for some, a few have sweet temperaments ?

I can volunteer some pet food

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

And what are they going to do about it? If breaking the oath bears no teeth, the oath is pointless.

I face more punishment breaking my Paladin oath in Baldurs Gate 3…

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Just like all checks and balances in government, it assumes the branches are somewhat independent and ethical, at least claim to serve their constituents, and protect their own power. It’s up to the legislative branch or the judicial branch

permalink
report
parent
reply

One Final Check

State Vs Federal.

Grab your popcorns, because you wont be able to afford it in the future!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Turns out the concept of “checks and balances” was always a stupid lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If it’s a law then he broke the law which means no other politician should be involved in the process as it’s a matter for the police, he should be prevented from taking power by those who enforce the law, aka the police.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Nullification Crisis v2.0: Blue States Boogaloo

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I still never finished act 2… patches and mod updates sent me back to RTS and 4x. My last run was a dope oath breaking paladin

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m trying to keep my ancients oath but every dialogue option seems like a trap to make you lose it. I fucking lost it talking to a bird for fucks sake. I’ve lost so many hours of progress resetting because I don’t want to pay 1000 gold, it’s literally 1/10th that cost to change your class.

I wish paladins had a morality slider instead, like KOTOR

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you play with any mods? UI?

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points
*

I’d be happy that Trump voters finally got what they deserve, but unfortunately, the rest of us have to suffer the consequences alongside them. As well as the rest of the world.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

I don’t know why, but most of the world voting their political parties into power is trending to the conservative right not towards the progressive left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Because things are getting more worrying on a global scale (economical slow down, ecological crisis and wars) and the usual human reflexes are conservatism and blaming the people who are different. I think progressive ideas rather spread in times of peace and prosperity, or after catastrophic events like WW2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

the usual human reflexes are conservatism

Like voting in to power the people causing the economic and environmental issues. It’s absolutely mind-boggling how easy humans can be convinced to vote against their own interests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I think the billionaire class has decided it’s better to be in control of government right now so they can use the power of state violence to keep their material wealth. There is an ongoing refugee crisis that is going to affect every single country as climate change makes certain places uninhabitable.

The final battle of the class war is upon us.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Historically this does seem to be the trend. However it could be worth pointing out that the original New Deal was enacted during a period of historic economic turmoil and upheaval. Could be worth refreshing ourselves on how that came about to help prepare for what’s coming next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“Most of the world” isn’t voting at all. And that is how the right wing gains power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Turnout in the UK this year was 59.7%. Ireland’s 60%, Japan 54%, France 63%, South Africa 59%, Mexico 61%. Indonesia 82%. India 65%. Sri Lanka 79%. America’s around 65%.

In 2022 Italy had 63%, Brazil 79%, Australia 92%.

In 2021, Germany’s was 76%.

What does “most of the world isn’t voting at all” mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The trend is technically voting out the establishment - trying something new out of desperation. Unfortunately, the extreme right is more than willing to pretend that they have a solution. Usually, it’s to blame the other and promise to get rid of the other. You know, Nazi shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Technology has enabled the centralization of power and wealth in an unprecedented way. Also Russian influence campaigns, for the same reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

It’s funny how Brazil (a country that’s seen the consequences of authoritarianism) is handling their own attempted coup vs the U.S., we are basically welcoming Trump back after everything he’s done.

After the coup attempt he should have been barred from office and arrested. This is such a ridiculous timeline.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Societies get the leaders they deserve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I hate that sentiment and especially wording, but there is sadly truth behind it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I guess… he barely won the popular vote, and didn’t pick up any significant amount of new voters. I wouldn’t say the basically half of voters who voted against this deserve it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is the part that hurts the most.

I canvassed, I rallied, I pushed people to vote. I did what I could to ensure the fascist didn’t win again, but he still did. Enough of my country either didn’t care, found some excuse to not vote for her, or wanted him to to be president.

I was denied a chance at a primary, but I was excited for Kamala. There is no person who can sit and represent 300 million people and make them all happy, but she was more on my side than not, and I’m willing to push for ‘better right now’ and then push for ‘better later’ too as distinct events.

As part of the now vocal minority, I don’t relish what is to come. I didn’t ask for it and I don’t want it; but lumped in with ‘Americans’, we sure seem to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The 80 million people who didn’t vote deserve it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Him not signing an ethics pledge is probably the most honest move he did in his lifetime.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 486K

    Comments