Just look at that. This truck is taller than a used kid (10 years old). I assume the truck can run over pretty much any other age but probably the driver might be able to see older kid’s heads. Or we could teach our kids to jump to school rather than walk. If you see a truck, jump and make eye contact before jumping while crossing the street. Or we could tell our kids to never go outside until they are 21.

93 points

NHTSA recently published a proposed rule taking on pedestrian safety, specifically calling out this problem. Expect it to be killed early next year.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Oh you mean the new kid regulations requiring stilts and helmets to bring your kids outside? We probably also need new construction regulations to required bollards along the side of the property facing the street so as to prevent damage to trucks if the house happens to get too close.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

This one.

There’s a link to the proposed rule in the first paragraph. Note the diagrams on page 35, page 51, then page 84. They’re working on it. NHTSA is slow, and they won’t be allowed to finish.

You can comment here if you’d like to actually do something besides be snarky on a website nobody reads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In other news, NHTSA with the help of major manufacturers has determined the typical height of a ten year old is eight feet tall. Personal vehicles will be mandated to be able to see people of this height over the hood

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No stilts and helmets, that would be silly. The regulations require jumping up and down like a frog to stay visible, but also you’re entirely responsible to crossy the road while cars and trucks continue at speed

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So, no change?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Probably going to require front-facing camera. Similar to how they dealt with the rear visibility issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

IE one more screen based thing to distract from the fact that other humans exist.

Rear cameras make sense and help people who might no be tall enough or flexible enough to twist and look out the rear window.

But the front camera will be a distraction from lying proper attention while driving forward.

We need more vans really, but consumers (who can afford the fucking things) are too insecure to drive anything that might make their wieners look small.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yep sounds like “burdensome regulation” to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Just gonna keep on posting this

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I’m surprised a school bus isn’t on this list

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Looking at normal buses, the driver is sat high up, right at the front and with a clear view in front of them. And it’s so weird the US school buses just ignore that design and are shaped like an old truck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

shaped like an old truck.

Up until recently, a good chunk of school buses were trucks, mainly based on the E/F350 - F650 platforms (or 3500 - 6500 if using GMC). Recently though, bus manufacturers are switching to internally designed platforms and the result is more cab-over buses and the ones that aren’t have a more swept hood (look at the Blue Bird Vision for an example). However, small buses are still based on truck platforms (E/F350, or GMC 3500)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A lot of those have been replaced with modern designs. Just like most things, the farther you are from a city the shittier things get.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

School busses have barriers to force children to walk far enough away. When you don’t care about smooth lines, practical solutions are possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I swear GM and Ford are competing with each other on blind spot length

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They sort of are. Long hoods and large grills look powerful (like there’s a huge motor in there) so they compete to look tougher and more powerful

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I like how they put a golf cart in there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s a tuktuk

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t disagree with the general premise.

But saying “this quarry hauler is only barely worse than pickup trucks” when it takes double the distance to see one…feels disingenuous. Same with the “this tractor cab has better visibility but requires a special license”, yeah cause a heavy laden trailer massively increases the stopping distance and requires a more advanced skill set.

I also feel like the kinda situations where “a three year was suddenly less than 1m from my bumper with zero warning” is more of a walkability/road design/driver awareness issue than one specifically solvable by increased visibility. I’m also aware I’m no traffic safety scientist; also more visibility is of course better.

I feel like this focuses on something that’s rooted more in emotion than logic or data, but there is a link between hood height and pedestrian injury severity iirc, and lowering that does increase visibility as a result.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Used kid?

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Not everyone can afford a new one bro. Don’t sound so put off about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Once they’ve been run over a few times, they tend to be longer for some reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I believe the proper nomenclature is “adopted kid”, not used. They don’t like either term however.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

From the legendary Used Kids Records store, maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This truck is taller than a used kid (10 years old).

Well there’s your problem: you’ve got a used kid. New kids are, on average, about 5’9" - plenty tall to compete with today’s civilian tanks.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Donnie Wahlberg was a New kid on the block??? Wow. I had no idea!

I’m used to the normal transition between toddler pupae to child-like human. That’s when I though children were brand spanking new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You know Mark Walberg was in a funky bunch right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not just any funky bunch, THE Funky Bunch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We’re gonna need their average size at 10yos.

If we need a bigger sample size, I’m open to pulling in Backstreet Boys, and Nsync

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I recall about 10 years ago, a guy at a shop i used to work at bought a GMC6500. I’m 6’2" and could easily walk under the side mirrors.

I noticed the truck was parked in the same spor for about a month. I asked some of the guys I worked with why it hadn’t moved. Apparently, the owner was getting into it when he fell out backward, injuring himself.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m 5’3 and had to do an oil change one one when I worked at wal-mart. I was in the pit so I had to stand on the top rung of the step ladder we had down there just to reach the suspension so I could hang off it to get at the oil filter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s nice when stupid vehicles attack their owners rather than pedestrians and cyclists

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 997

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments