Great job there Americans and a special shout out to White gen-X’ers for cutting your own soon to be retirement.

39 points

“We’re going to have to have some hard decisions. We got to bring the Democrats in to talk about Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare. There’s hundreds of billions of dollars to be saved, and we know how to do it, we just have to have the stomach to actually take those challenges on,”

Or, hear me out… stop letting private healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry charge insane prices?

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Billions of DOLLARS to be saved, millions of LIVES to be sacrificed.

Mammon is hungry

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Those are like three of our nations most successful programs.

Also, hundreds of billions is like a couple of aircraft carriers and a stealth bomber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not even that.

If you buy any of those you buy the upkeep and maintenance costs as well and for even a single last Gen plane that can cost well into a the hundreds of millions and potentially billions if it has the service life of something like a b52 or the speciality of a stealth craft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What about the poor shareholders? Are you not thinking of them? Or how about the executives and their yachts? How are they going to afford all their hookers and blow?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

There should be no tough choices here, it should only be about removing that stupid cap.

Notwithstanding but it’s really damn stupid that my middle class ass stops paying into social security before the end of the year while the working class subsidizes me.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I had no idea there was even a cap, that’s ridiculous. I don’t know a single middle class person IRL that earns enough individually to hit that cap though, so it is probably a bit regional since that cap feels like it would be awfully low in SV or a high COL city.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Keep in mind that Social Security retirement benefits depend on your contributions. So by capping the amount you contribute, Social Security also caps the amount you will receive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

While I agree the cap needs to be removed. The cap is only stopping you from subsidizing more of the working class. They are not subsidizing you. The payout is also capped. You’re effectively paying a portion of your contribution to boost the payout of multiple other people who contributed less during their careers

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The way I see it, sure it’s called but I work a pretty good, white collar job, I’m going to statistically live longer than my blue collar peers drawing more over time and end of the day. I’m going to get a whole lot more out than the average blue collar worker and end result is that the working class is going and are subsidizing those rich people who are living longer putting that drain on resources.

That’s just the way i see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That’s not the way the math works, regardless of how you “see it”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Shit guys, no one tell Bronzebeard the concept of insurance!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why did you feel the need to say this twice?

You’re now wing both times. Funding is very different from insurance, which was the entire point of this discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“We’re going to have to have some hard decisions.

Really? For a Repub these are easy choices, boot straps plebs, boot straps

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Yeah, they are rubbing their hands together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Really love how it’s the cash strapped programs that gotta face the tough times while the richest CEOs and businesses are finally getting “relief” from their burdensome taxes.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

This is that “tough love” that Chomsky always talked about: for most everyone, it’s “tough”, meaning lots of austerity and telling people to keep their chin up and work three jobs or whatever. For the elites, it’s “love”, and lots of it. In the form of huge handouts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Look on the bright side, some CEOs are getting relief from this mortal coil!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I bet the really juicy healthcare package that members of Congress have isn’t on the table for review.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 479K

    Comments