196 points

I refuse to pay for ads to be delivered to me. Seeing them unpaid is bad enough and I avoid it at all costs. But I will not pay for ads.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

I’ve returned to the high seas, eye patch and all.

I found a seedbox provider that is fairly cheap and works well. I have a long standing rss feed for new shows so next step is going to be getting it setup to auto download for me. I can do it locally but spectrum is hard core with the dmca notices and I don’t want to risk losing my account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Have a look at the **arr range of apps

Sonarr and Radarr with NZBGet, usenet indexer and a cheap unlimited news server provider, and you’re laughing. I have everything downloading automagically as soon as its release, loads right into Jellyfin - all on a copyright notice keen ISP and never have any issues because im not sharing anything up, its all down with usenet

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or classic torrents combined with a VPN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have been looking into this solution, I am concerned on whether it will need a VPN or not. I have one already, but it does not play nice with my current solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I have Spectrum as well, but using a VPN w/ dead switch turned on has worked thus far. They really are ruthless with dmca though. Hate Spectrum with a deep, deep passion, and not just because of that, but everything else. There’s a competitor rolling out fiber everywhere in my city though, so I will soon be ditching them, thankfully.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There are 2 companies running fiber in my city but I live in the outskirts in what I call country’ish, no clue if/when they make it to my street, there are only like 20 houses if that on my road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If I’m not mistaken, Spectrum has no data cap, right?

Asking because I actually miss Spectrum relative to other major cable providers. And I’ve not had the opportunity to get on the fiber train yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just use a vpn, always, and spectrum has no idea what you’re doing

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or, I could pay the $9/month for a server that has a 10gig connection to the rest of the world and do my part by leaving them seeding for longer than I would otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I pay about $300 per year for an IPTV service that provides over 3000 channels which means all the news and sports I can think of. Also on demand TV and movies, and recordings of popular live sports. It allows 2 public IPs so I share this service with my brother. It’s amazing. I’ve used a few different IPTV services that got shutdown and this one is the best. It’s been about 2 years now which is about as long as I’ve seen these services last so I hope it doesn’t get shut down anytime soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d rather just run my own service for my own use. I have a nas and I use vlc on my TV to watch anything I want. I’m currently working on grabbing all of the shows that I want to re-watch and are available in their entirety, homeland, the wire, Dr who, Archer, etc. I’ll also be keeping an eye on the paramount and others for shows that look interesting and add them to my rss feed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Even as a child, when we had cable, I would ask my dad why we still had to watch commercials even though we pay for the service. I understood why stations like CBS, NBC, or ABC may have needed ads as they were free over-the-air, but surely paying for cable should mean no ads, right?

Never had a good answer. It’s pretty fucked up that we collectively allowed them to pull that shit on us and put up with it for like 3 decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

There was a brief and glorious time when Pay Cable was billed as being ad-free. You would still see promos for other shows and channels between shows, but there were no commercial breaks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Same as BBC in the UK.

Maybe a 5-10 sec “And next on BBC 1 is blah blah and on BBC 2 we have blah blah starting at 7 o’clock”

Of course you “have” to pay for it, though (if you don’t pay nobody would know).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh shit, I forgot about that being a thing. Wow, how the fuck did society get so accustomed to dealing with that BS? Granted, we almost broke out of it when streaming became mainstream, but it looks like we’re about to get a screwed right back into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points
*

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

yo ho, a pirates life for me

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Would help if they still made content worth pirating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I liked The Boys and Tales From The Loop. Couldn’t tell you anything else they made though

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Invincible is pretty good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

fair point.

The Boys was good, but the Lord of the Rings series was horrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Invincibles was good too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Meh. I found it enjoyable overall, despite some annoyances.

And I’ve read the books a fair bit. Even The Silmarillion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kind of glad Marvelous Mrs. Maisel ended when it did, so I don’t need to see ads!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

This is where I’m stuck honestly. I don’t think this news will affect my life at all 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

How do people think paying for a service and still being served ads is acceptable?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Hulu has a lower price tear that includes ads. It makes it more affordable for some people. If they had started out with ads I would be less upset, but for a big company like Amazon it just seems like they’re trying to make even more money off of the consumer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Hulu DID start out with ads. When they launched it was an entirely ad supported service. Hulu+ didn’t come until years later. After several years of running two tiers of service, free ad supported and paid ad free, they dropped the free tier. Now, years later, we’re back to ads with Hulu, but this time you pay for the privilege.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

People lived with it for years with cable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Cable started out without ads too. That was why you paid for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Right, but the business model is totally different. You’re paying your cable provider for access, you’re not paying to watch the TV shows. The TV shows were financed by broadcaster advertising revenues among other streams of income. With Amazon, you’re paying for access and to fund their programs. Ads are just greedy and anti-consumer for a vertically integrated platform like Amazon Video.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Cable wasn’t really a thing here in the UK, we’re not primed for their bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sky has a shit ton of ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i see what you did there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair, Prime Video has always just been a free perk attached to prime (and with all the other ‘perks’ combined you could basically consider it free). For example I get an extra 3% back on all my Amazon orders by being a prime member. At the current cost of prime and just with the home supplies I order w/ subscribe and save, it pays for itself. That’s not to say I’m happy with this, but in actuality they’re fairly well positioned with the product to make this move and have most of the user base be merely disgruntled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

It’s literally a race to the bottom on streaming services before we eventually end up with cable in an app. Or rather multiple apps.

Fuck I hate this timeline.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

My ISP already offers a streaming package, you pay monthly for a package of streaming apps. It’s literally cable with extra steps

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

cable […] in multiple apps

These ppl really reinvented cable, but worse

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Seriously, everything that was once good is now either fucked or planning to be fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Finally, that’s what everyone has been eagerly waiting for …

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Yeah, what we were always missing after fleeing cable, was the ads that really made each show worth it.

Why can’t we just have nice things?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Because of Capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well tell it to stop breaking all my stuff. This is bullying 😭

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments