Cw: discussion of common cw tags and subjects, including violence, sexual violence, animal products, and others.

Bluesky’s trust and safety (betrayal and bullshit) team is engaged in high fuckery and we’re likely going to get some new folks coming in from bksy.

Now’s probably a good time to revisit content warnings and when and how to use them.

Content warnings are just that; a warning about the content of a post or submission. They grew out of the older notion of “trigger warnings” as an acknowledgement that no one could reasonably guess what might be triggering to other people. Instead content warnings are a more general heads up that a discussion contains material that may be upsetting or unwanted by some people.

It’s a friendly warning so folks can decide whether or not they’d like to engage with the discussion.

Note on “nsfw”. When assessing if something is not safe for work ask yourself if a corporate HR rep who hated you would use it as evidence to get you fired.

Animal products - posts discussion animal products like meat or leather should have cw: animal products or cw: meat in the post title or header. Posts should usually be labelled nsfw and it’s courteous to put discussions inside a spoiler tag so people can choose if they want to open it or not.

Sexual violence or sexual assault - posts discussion sexual violence, sexual assault, intimate partner violencen, or sexual violence against kids, all need to be labelled with a cw. Sv is commomly used for sexual violence, sa for sexual assault, csa or csam for violence against children. Posts should always have a nsfw tag or be placed in a spoiler tag.

Violence - posts discussing violence, torture, and related topics should have a cw as such and use spoiler tags and nsfw tags as appropriate.

Graphic images - graphic images of violence, combat footage, severe injusry or death, should be labelled as such and should always have an appropriate cw and be placed in spoiler tags and marked with the nsfw.

Bigotry - sexism, racism, tranphobia, misogyny, ethnic bigotry, ableism, and really any structural violence generally merits a cw. If it’s graphic or upsetting putting the material in a spoiler tag is polite.

Some other things that may merit a cw

  • common phobias liek spiders and clowns

  • particularly awful politics

  • notorious or hated political figures

  • Hexbear pop culture enemies - for instance superhero movies are often semi-seriously marked with a “capeshit” warning

  • topics discussing religious trauma

  • sexual topics and general horniness as a courtesy to our ace and otherwise not-interested comrades

  • medical trauma and topics that are frequent sites of medical violence.

If there was a “rule” it’d be; if you think someoen might find your post upsetting it’s usually wroth writing a one or two word cw and sticking it at the top of the post. It’s a courteous way to give people a heads up on what the discussion is about so if it’s content they don’t want to engage with they can skip it and keep browsing.

57 points

Not disagreeing with this but I find it funny:

Note on “nsfw”. When assessing if something is not safe for work ask yourself if a corporate HR rep who hated you would use it as evidence to get you fired.

Most corporate HR reps would use literally any posting whatsoever in Hexbear as a reason to get you fired.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

this is gonna sound gross for a second, but imagine hexbear was Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

You have to yourself now

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Ban yourself and ban everyone around you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

PLEASE DON’T! Last time they did that it ended in an absolute shitshow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

NSFW:

spoiler

Unionize

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

ngl, kinda weird to see the newbies with their actual faces for their pfp. I’m not sure if we ever had an explicit rule against that, but it’s something that I’ve noticed.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Twitter and its descendants are much more about building a personal brand. This place is more like the old internet where no one felt comfortable doxing themselves. Hopefully, our ways rub off on the newbies a bit. Opsec is going to be especially important in the coming fash wave.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I kinda think it should be an explicit rule against having your actual face, but that’s just me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

What if you use your actual face, but you’re famous, so no one would think it’s actually Jerma?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think that’s a great idea. I don’t particularly like the idea of the culture here becoming more like twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I posted my face but I was in full halloween makeup

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I have posted a few pics of myself but that is only cuz all the cops/fash in my area already know who I am.

If you aren’t a known entity already I get the anonymity but at the same time if you aren’t going that hard IRL then how can you even call yourself a revolutionary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Hexbear pop culture enemies - for instance superhero movies are often semi-seriously marked with a “capeshit” warning

We should actually stop doing this. The function of Content Warnings is to help people avoid upsetting material, not to signal that something is disapproved of. Using them ironically or “semi-seriously” makes them less effective in their actual function.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

I agree, ironic CWs are kind of a slap in the face to people who need to avoid certain things for whatever reason.

I think we should start tagging drug use as well, my own trigger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We ahould actually not stop doing this; superhero films are copaganda-lite at best. That can be a serious trigger for someone, especially racialised comrades who bear the deadly brunt of hero culture

permalink
report
parent
reply

Good stuff, thank you. I’m a BlueSky user, I’m gonna stay there for now but I’ll be active here as well. Glad to have found the place!

For those that asked, Bluesky mods let a certain well known “polite transphobe” “journalist” stay on the platform who is already getting around blocks to harass ppl

permalink
report
reply
13 points

We are sooooo much cooler and more fun than a Twitter clone. There is genuine community to be found here that kinda give the old web 1.0 bulletin board forum feel. There’s a lot of posters but not so many you won’t start to get to know recurring names and kinda some of who they are through their posts over time. It’s less of a reddit or Twitter kinda scroll madness algorithmically designed to keep you there with millions of random posters you’ll never see or hear from again. We have really got something special going on here compared to the rest of the post social media internet. If I found out a poster here lived near me irl I’d help them move if they were moving. It’s really nice here and I hope you think so too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m excited to be here! I was just talking with someone irl about how we need to go back to the old forums type social media stuff and Hexbear drops into my life. I’m pretty isolated irl so it’ll be great to meet some new comrades and community

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Posting everywhere else is a frustrating ordeal of lib and chud debate nerds, civility perverts and just annoying people. Not having to restate tired arguments over and over and occasionally productive conversation going that isn’t derailed by interlopers is just really nice. And that’s the baseline. We got movie nights, more emoji than words in every language combined, the news mega is genuinely the best news source you’ll find. Hexbear has it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Which Journo?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Jesse Singal

permalink
report
parent
reply

Although calling him a journalist is a gigantic stretch. The man is just three bigots and a PR rep in a trench coat going “just say you’re just asking questions about tricky science!”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lmfao how the hell did Jesse Singal break Bluesky. Of all the people I expected to sink that Habakkuk of a ship, he was not on my list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Culturally, we’re irony and sarcasm-heavy, but often do not label it with tags like /s or /j. If you’re not sure, look for context. I think this aspect of the banter here can really throw people for a loop

permalink
report
reply
21 points

this is something about site culture that might end up changing in the future in an effort to be more accommodating to ND users tbh. For now, new users should know that if you ask “is this a bit?” it is generally honored here that you’ll be answered truthfully first (and maybe jokingly after someone clears it up).

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I thrive in the land of ‘is this a bit?’ And I feel like needing to tell the truth when asked is a fair compromise. Being confusing can often be a valuable part of a joke, it’s how you get someone to accidentally tee up your punchline

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s very context dependent. If it’s a long timer user and they are saying something absurdly reactionary, it’s probably them doing a bit. Check with them if you aren’t sure lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

especially if it’s coming from an account who posts alot about dedollarization (you know who you are)

permalink
report
parent
reply

mfw the rest of Hexbear didn’t recognize “Biden is the lesser evil when it comes to queer rights” as an elaborate bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

True dat. If you’re not sure what someone means you can usually ask them to clarify. There are layers and layers and layers of in-jokes and weird site culture things.

permalink
report
parent
reply