I hate how “anti-war” has been hijacked by these people to mean, let imperialist countries invade whoever they want with no consequences. (in the case of tankies, any imperialist country that isn’t in NATO).

128 points

If Russia stops fighting there would be no war. If Ukraine stops fighting there would be no Ukraine.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Well said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

At this stage, since they have fought so well, I’d guess there would just be a much smaller, much weaker Ukraine.

We will likely see this happen now Trump is president. He is too egotistical to not take revenge on them for not playing along with his quid pro quo back in 2019.

The Ukrainian flags in republican yards never meant a thing… They sold Ukraine out at the polls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That includes only battlefield context. Truth is Russia will at the very best economically and politically fall into a 3rd world country level the moment it loses the war. More probably dissolve into smaller states = there would be no Russia as we know it today anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good. After what they’ve done, they don’t deserve to exist as a nation anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Yeah. Let US the saint be world’s boss. Never killed a fly anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Literally repeating US State Dept. talking points.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This guy floating up to the sky when US State Department says that gravity is real

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

… and the WMD’s will be found any day now in Iraq General Powell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And? The saying was popular before Blinken’s speech btw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I can’t find an earlier source. And it’s not accurate:

Boris Johnson Pressured Zelenskyy to Ditch Peace Talks With Russia: Ukrainian Paper

In the weeks ahead of Johnson’s April 9 visit, high-level diplomatic talks held in Belarus and Turkey had failed to yield a diplomatic breakthrough, though reports in mid-March indicated that Russian and Ukrainian delegations “made significant progress” toward a 15-point peace deal that would involve Ukraine renouncing its NATO ambitions in exchange for the withdrawal of Moscow’s troops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Remember that the original Canadian intent of the UN Peacekeepers was that they would forcibly create and enforce peace.

It was the USSR and the USA that objected to the concept.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Similarly if most countries have a mutual defence pact, no one country will be able to invade another without being at war with literally the whole world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I’m afraid that mutual defense isn’t as iron clad as you think. If Article 5 of NATO ever gets triggered you’ll get a masterclass on weaseling out of obligations. It’s ironic because Ukraine may already be receiving the kind of support a full NATO member is entitled to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Unfortunately with Trump the US will try to weasel their way out. Europe knows too well what happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It only works if you actually commit to it.

But imagine the implications if a country did not commit to it (bar an obvious one like Hungary or Turkey). They’ll likely get sanctioned, probably will have trouble entering any useful alliances for the next decade or so because no one trusts them anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Article 5 was triggered by 9/11 and is the reason everyone followed America into Afghanistan

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ww1

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ireland has peacekeepers between Israel and Lebanon right now. They wouldn’t be there if “create peace” was one of the missions.

Peace must exist, however briefly, and then the peacekeepers place themselves in harm’s way to keep the peace.

Extend the mission to militarily “create peace” and suddenly you are just NATO/USA. How can either side trust a peace that was enforced upon them and not call it a defeat, whose borders are disputed for eternity? Every nationalist who wants to stir sentiment can just say “look what the British/Americans/UN imposed on us”. Outside forces drawing borders is pretty much the cause of 90% of warfare, civil and otherwise, for the last 80 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

A Canadian was also the principal author of the UN declaration on human rights, and another was the reason NATO is a political as well as military alliance. We just keep winning!

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

I don’t understand how other communists can defend Russia at this point. It feels to me like most of them forget that Russia is no longer a communist country.

They’re capitalists. Putin is often using christo-fascist tactics. He’s also pushing for Russian imperialism in very capitalistic ways. Also, Russia was 100 percent the agitators here.

Just because it challenges US worldwide hegemony doesn’t automatically make it good, boys.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Tankies might as well be called CINOs — communists in name only. Their defining feature is reverence towards authoritarian leaders. They revere Putin and Xi as “strong” leaders and completely ignore how little their regimes have in common with the socialist workers paradise Marx envisioned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

My favorite is when they argue that China has billionaires and private property and a stock market because Marx said you have to go through capitalism to get to communism. Which… doesn’t somehow also apply to the West?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Gee I wonder who you could be referring to mmmmhhh gee I really wonder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

What makes you say they don’t think it applies to the West? I don’t follow your logic there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’ll stick with “Cosplay Commies”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I especially despise how Putin and Xi were seen as ‘strong’ leaders, but when shit hit the fan in the last 5 years, they just hid away from repercussions

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Do you know what you’ve done!? You’ve summoned him! He’s like Beetlejuice, say three Marxist terms and he appears. Combie will be here soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Seriously. Those dumb Iraqis who fought back deserved to die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I’m really curious how or why it works. Do they hate US so much that anyone against the US seems a hero to them, despite being off the same kind but pretending to be a communist/socialist?

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

I am curious about this as well. At least in some cases, it seems to be due to “alternate facts”, e.g., https://lemmy.ca/comment/13198294

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Are they saying that the U.S. was preparing Ukraine for war in 2014… Which Russia had started moving their forces in 2013 and started the invasion in February of 2014. It’s like how people try to say “well Russia wouldn’t have invaded Ukraine if Trump had still been president”… When Russia mobilized their troops and equipment and marched them there for the invasion while Trump was still President.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That was an… interesting read 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Damn, that’s alternate as fuck 🤢

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

That’s exactly the reason (even if they don’t 100% admit it) for the communist parties in my country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There is rarely, if ever, support for Putin. What is more typical is a recognition the USSR was a better entity than both what it replaced and what replaced it. So there is usually the connection that the US is the reason Russia is the way it is, which is usually lauded as ‘USA bad’.

So even though America was the global superpower after the fall of the USSR: Putin, (or at least someone like him), was wanted in power. ‘Keep rootin for Putin’ wasn’t just a pundit book 20 years ago.

All in all when the goal is eradicating communism at all costs, you wind up with war mongering right wingers in their stead: and that’s the perspective every communist I have interacted with has come from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A surprising portion of people in the northern hemisphere think that a person having lots of money is literally exactly the same thing as a person having lots of blessings from [deity]. They see that Russia is run by oligarchs, and that since those oligarchs command lots of currency, they are inherently chosen by [diety] to always be correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Who thinks that? Are we talking about the old Pharaoh’s of Egypt?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperity_theology

I notice this to be most prevalent amongst the Russian Orthodox people I know as well as Evangelical Christians, but it’s not limited to those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d say these two probably think something along those lines…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

It’s like their version of STOP RESISTING.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

My Mom said Russia had to attack Ukraine, because they were trying to join NATO. I asked why she thinks Ukraine was trying to join NATO. I’m still digging for a bedrock of logic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Part of the problem with game theory and finding a “bedrock of logic” is that game theoretical analysis is often recursive. It’s not a stack of prepositions and conclusions; it’s often a loop. Sort of like a resonance structure. I’ve got my gun aimed at you because your gun is aimed at me because my gun is aimed at you … recursively forever.

My understanding is that the US/NATO and the USSR/Russia, ie the two sides of the Cold War, have maintained a sense of peace and security by maintaining a buffer between the two sides. A buffer of distance, which is relevant because it relates to the time it takes nuclear weapons to travel from one adversarial territory to the other.

The Cuban Missile Crisis was basically caused because Cuba was too close to the USA for nuclear missiles to be stored in a way that the balance of MAD could be maintained.

The public declaration (by Kamala Harris, incidentally) that Ukraine would join NATO is a violation of a promise made by Reagan that NATO would not extend to the border of Russia.

It’s similar to the USSR’s attempt to install nuclear missiles in Cuba, in the sense that it’s simply too close.

That’s my understanding of the motivation behind Russia’s invasion. I’m quite new to all this though.

So it’s less like “Stop resisting!” and more like “Drop the gun!”

My suspicion is that MAD overall is diminishing in its power to stabilize the world militarily, as a result of new military technologies coming into play (space-based weapons, drones, AI, hypersonic missiles, iron dome scenarios) as well as more and more nuclear powers coming online, and the increasing probability of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of non-state actors.

And finally there’s China’s overall rise toward the role of hegemonic power.

The Cold War basically organized itself (and hence organized the influences that minimized military action) around two major powers. Now there’s a third major power that’s rapidly accelerating toward becoming the major power. It’s changing all the equations that balanced out in the 1970s, 80s, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

The reason Ukraine wanted to join NATO is that Russia already had occupied Crimea and part of Georgia before. All that after Ukraine gave up all the nukes they still had from USSR times. Ukraine was not a threat to Russia before the occupation of Crimea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Distance is really not much of a factor any more, and hasn’t been for a long time. Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg can already be reached by submarine launched cruise missiles in less than 15 minutes (conservative estimate). And let’s face it, with MAD being a thing, any kind of nuclear strike is likely to escalate into all-out nuclear annihilation, anyway. This makes any attempt at overwhelming the opponent a losing proposition. So in that sense nothing has changed since, oh, the mid-1970s?

Then there is the argument that Russia doesn’t want a long shared border with NATO. Guess what, their aggression has caused Finland and Sweden to join NATO, which has only added to their shared border with NATO. That they already had with Poland and the Baltic states (there is no treaty nor official document prohibiting NATO expansion).

And finally, how hard is it to understand that NATO is a defensive alliance? It is neither politically geared to nor militarily capable of mounting a conquest of Russia. The fact that so many of Russia’s neighbors are eager to join the alliance should be a pretty strong hint as to why it needs to exist in the first place. It is Russia that cannot be trusted, not NATO. And you can’t make your neighbor “drop the gun” in their own house. The Ukrainians were stupid enough already to return their nuclear arsenal to Russia in return for explicit security guarantees. What a mistake that was.

Don’t even get me started on how China is criminally underrated as a manifest threat to world peace…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The Cuban Missile Crisis was basically caused because Cuba was too close to the USA for nuclear missiles to be stored in a way that the balance of MAD could be maintained.

The so-called Cuban Missile Crisis was caused by Kennedy moving nuclear missiles into Turkey, within striking range of the USSR. It never would have happened if Kennedy hadn’t decided to start swinging his dick around.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.

Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 180K

    Comments