Summary
Progressives criticized House Democrats for choosing Rep. Gerry Connolly over Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the top Democratic seat on the House Oversight Committee.
The 131-84 vote, reportedly influenced by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, sparked backlash against the party’s “gerontocracy,” with critics like MSNBC’s Joy Reid and others arguing it prioritizes seniority over fresh ideas.
Connolly defended the decision, citing his experience, but progressives argued it reflects the Democratic Party’s resistance to change, hindering its ability to address future challenges and energize younger voters.
it’s fine I’ve got experience
A fat lot of good your fucking “experience” has done us lately, wouldn’t you say, Connolly, you ossified, cancer-ridden, insider-trading, neoliberal establishment fuck.
I take issue with using cancer-ridden as a derogatory term, but yeah, experience doesn’t mean anything if you’re working towards the wrong goals
It’s not just that he’s 74…
It’s not just that he got diagnosed with terminal throat cancer, and told voters the day after the recent election.
It’s that it hasn’t been two years since he last violated (the already barely existent) rules against Congress doing a little insider trading.
https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/gerry-connolly-stocks/
Like, did anyone think when Pelosi was weighing in on the oversight committee, that the person she was backing wasnt corrupt and would actually hold anyone from either party accountable?
Pelosi didn’t care just because she hates everyone under retirement age. It’s because she needed to know the person in charge of the oversight committee had no reason to hold anyone accountable.
Probably more about her suspiciously making 66% returns on her stock investments than anything
That’s what I mean, she’s corrupt as fuck.
Everyone got hung up on Pelosi just “disliking” AOC, but this would have allowed AOC to investigate Pelosi and other corrupt Dems.
So Pelosi made sure a corrupt Dem got it. That way the status quo is maintained: Dems only go after R, and R only goes after Dems. But neither ever make anything stick.
AOC would try to go after everyone corrupt, and the Republicans would go with it if the target was a Dem.
We’d weed out corruption from the Dem party which would increase turnout, and likely retain the seats.
But it would be bad for Pelosi, and she’ll always put herself over party or country
Just want to point out that most of the top traders are always Republicans but they’re never talked about in this context and Pelosi sometimes doesn’t even beat the S&P500.
She seems to beat it for the most part. There’s a simulator that has a Pelosi ETF trading as “NANC”:
https://simulator.tryshare.app/?tickers=NANC
Over the past 5 years, NANC has an annualized return of 15.2%, compared to 8.1% for SPY. I don’t know if the simulator takes transaction costs into account or not, but I’d guess she still beats it on average. I would hope she does, given the legalized insider trading involved.
rich old white guy: i have an idea - lets have a rich old white guy do it instead
[all vote yea]
:/
Jesus Christ, these people don’t learn.
Exactly. This isn’t a mistake or incompetence, it’s the point.
It’s what they’re paid to do. War over social issue symptoms with their “opposition” to present a false choice to the rubes who believe they’re “free,” while protecting the completely captured economy exactly as it is… From the people suffering it.
Well… how about a third Party of Sanity?
Sorry. No. I did the math on this and I’ve determined that a vote for Sanity is just a vote for Trump.
You need to end FPTP voting first. So please call the republican congressperson in your gerrymandered district currently authoring the “Ban Liberals From Voting Act of 2025” and let them know you’d like to make it easier for him to lose. If we all work together, we can make it possible for a Libertarian to win a House Seat in 2036.
we can make it possible for a Libertarian to win a House Seat in 2036.
