Financial experts predicted Jeff Bezos’s move to Florida would pay off handsomely—and they were right. So far, the Amazon founder’s tax savings have been astronomical, worth an estimated $1 billion this year alone.

140 points

permalink
report
reply
84 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I have so many hours in smash and totally forgot about this. I’m honestly shocked it hasn’t been clipped and posted more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Stop glorifying terrorists. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What terrorist? It’s just Luigi

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

“Moving,” as though billionaires live in “one place.”

All he did was change his primary address, and maybe buy property in Florida.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Bought, and then immediately mortgaged the entire value at 0% interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Easy! All you have to do is buy a mortgage company!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah I was going to say he didn’t move anywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m wondering how that private island community will fare in a few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s scuba tours all the way down

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

In other words: tax evasion. Eat the rich.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

It’s called “tax avoidance” when you’re a billionaire and it’s legal

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s called that if you’re not a billionaire and it’s legal, too. Taking your personal deduction is tax avoidance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

From what I understand - avoidance is using legal means to avoid paying tax, while evasion is using all the other means to evade getting taxed altogether.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

You know what else is legal? Denying healthcare claims automatically. When the laws stop serving the people, don’t expect people to follow them out of the goodness of their hearts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s called optimal accounting in my classes. It’s not only legal but also annoying as shit when having to audit a company as a project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Washington … recently enacted a 7% levy on long-term capital gains of more than $250,000

I wonder how many people are actually going to stay in Washington state and pay this. I would definitely move if I were Bezos, and probably even if I had the $250,000 minimum (with the assumption that I was cashing out since I was retiring and so there wasn’t a job tying me to any particular location).

permalink
report
reply
1 point

…you don’t cash out your entire retirement accounts but when you retire.

250k in capital gains, and instead of the usual 10%, you’re paying 17% on it. Because that’s a shit ton of stock to sell in one year

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

…you don’t cash out your entire retirement accounts but when you retire.

No but you might move your money to a different, lower-risk investment. With that said, my post was poorly-written and the part about retirement was extraneous. I should have just said

with the assumption that there wasn’t a job tying me to any particular location

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Moving money within a retirement account, or even between retirement accounts does not incur capital gains, either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Canada enacted a capital gains tax and nobody moved (though obviously it’s harder to move countries)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would stay. I have no issue paying taxes as I believe it is for the betterment of society.

My issue is others not paying their fair share and that doesn’t mean I would join them if I couldn’t beat them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m proud in a way of how much I pay in taxes. It makes me feel like more of a productive member of society. However, if there was something completely legal and relatively easy which I could do to reduce the amount of taxes I paid, I don’t think doing it would be contrary to the notion of paying my fair share. Washington gets to set its tax policy, and I get to choose where I live. IMO, leaving Washington because of its tax policy has no moral implications. It’s no different than leaving because I don’t like the weather.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
20 points

Switzerland has a wealth tax as one of the few countries in the world, and wealthy people are flocking there. I can be done when you do it right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I thought we might have some cantons without it, but PwC says you’re right it’s all of Switzerland (the rates vary)

https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/switzerland/individual/other-taxes

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Everyone else has to start there due to Amazons RTO policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Washington … recently enacted a 7% levy on long-term capital gains of more than $250,000

To complete the picture on that, those that earn more than $533,400/year are subject to long term capital gains rate of 20%.

Example: If you held stock of $30m for more than one year’s time, and it increased in value to $50m when you sold it a year later, the capital gain from that sale would be $20m. Because your annual income is almost certainly more than $533,400/year, you’d have to pay 20% tax, on the gain. That tax would be $4m to the federal government and in Washington state, you’d pay a 7% tax on the $20m capital gain of an additional $1.4m to the state of Washington. So a grand total of $5.4m in capital gains if you lived in Washington or $4m if you lived in Florida.

Since his move in early 2024, Bezos has sold an estimated $13.6 billion worth of Amazon stock, according to Forbes.

To those that say that rich people only get loans on assets instead of selling assets and getting capital gains this article disagrees with you. So much so that Bezos tried to escape them. So an increase in capital gains at a federal level would tax these billionaires.

edit: removed one incorrect sentence when I switched my example numbers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Meaning to have a long term capital gain of $250,000 you would have had to sell long term assets that gained more than $12.5m

That is not how this works, any capital gains (which IS the asset values increase) above $250,000 would be subject to the levy regardless of the individuals federal capital gains tax rate.

Your example mostly holds up so I’m not sure if you simply made an error here as you do seem to have a grasp of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re right. I changed my example numbers halfway through writing the post to make it more clear. I thought I got all the old references. I missed that one. I’ve removed that line now to make a fully accurate post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Quite a few. That still works out to being cheaper than having to pay states income tax on most states and Washington is a hell of a lot nicer than the states that don’t tax income. Also, this affects very few people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Fair. Although you aren’t really struggling at that amount of wealth, and washington is very very nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Couldn’t pay me to live in Florida. Hope it falls into the sea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I moved from Florida to Washington (then later the Midwest). I’ll never return to Florida, but am constantly dreaming I’ll earn enough to be able to afford Washington again

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which part, exactly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If you sell your house for $250K more than you bought it you may well be struggling. For example, if you bought it 30 years ago for $20K and have to sell it for $300K because you have no income

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This does not affect returns from a primary residence sale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I left California because it charged the same rate on capital gains. Like you could owe nothing federally, but have to pay state income tax. It was also more annoying because I had to mail it! 12 pages don’t fit into an envelope so I didn’t even send them my full return

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Oh no. A rich person had to pay taxes on their gambling and it was annoying. The horror.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The point isn’t that you should feel sorry for him. It’s that he didn’t pay the tax but did take his money elsewhere. I don’t think California benefits when that happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 547K

    Comments