1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

You can help by asking ChatGPT to produce the most processor intensive prompt it can come up with and then having it execute it repeatedly. With the free version this will burn through your allotment pretty quickly, but if thousands of people start doing it on a regular basis? It’ll cost OpenAI a lot of money.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

To what benefit?

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’ll cost OpenAI a lot of money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sooooo, wanna tell us how much the cost really is per prompt?

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Why would anyone believe this? It’s a private company. They don’t have to be truthful talking about their finances.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Why would they lie about losing money? Companies lie for the opposite all the time, but none of them boasts of losing money, as that causes FUD, which exactly what a hypelord like Altman doesn’t want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Tax writroffs on the “losses”

“Nonprofit” image.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

$200 a month for a user is losing money? There’s no way he’s just including model queries. An entire a6000 server is around $800 / month and you can fit a hell of lot more than 4 peoples worth of queries. He has to include training and or R&D.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Surely this includes staff, real estate, and other operating costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

It includes anything that will keep them from having to pay investors back. Classic tech start up bullshit.

Silicon valley brain rot formula:

Losing money, get billions every month

Making money pay billions back

Which one do you think they pick

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m honestly fairly surprised as well, but at the same time, they’re not serving a model that can run on an A6000, and the people paying for unlimited, would probably be the ones who setup bots and apps doing thousands of requests per hour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

And honestly? Those people are 100% right.
If they can’t deliver true “unlimited” for 200 bucks a month, they shouldn’t market it as such.

grumble grumble unlimited mobile data grumble grumble

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

To be fair, unlimited is supposed to mean unlimited for a reasonable person. Like someone going to an “all you can eat buffet”. However those purchasing these would immediately set up proxy accounts and use them to serve all their communities, so that one unlimited account, becomes 100 or a 1000 actual users. So like someone going to an “all you can eat” and then sneaking in 5 other people under their trenchcoat.

If they actually do block this sort of account sharing, and it’s costing them money on just prolific single users, then I don’t know, their scaling is just shite. Like “unlimited” can’t ever be truly unlimited, as there should be a rate limit to prevent these sort of shenanigans. But if the account can’t make money with a reasonable rate limit (like 17280/day which would translate to 1 request per 5 sec) they are fuuuuuucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 548

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments

Community moderators